Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixing tests for Perceiver #14739
Fixing tests for Perceiver #14739
Changes from all commits
6090db5
7c8b18e
780d8c0
ff7b5c5
55d0061
d56ad2a
e81db3a
d07a4cb
d87f4b5
3d2c3c3
51a102d
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can this be more defined than just
Exception
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well, I have no idea what could crash on arbitrary initialization.
If we want to keep the magic being very tolerant here seems OK to me.
The code could fail because
feature_extractor_class
requires some argument to be defined, but also any exception that could be raised during__init__
so I don't see a way to be exhaustive here.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What's the reason this
feature_extractor_class
argument is added?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Because we need to initialize the feature extractor.
It does not work with
from_pretrained
above because thecheckpoint == "deepmind/language-perceiver"
(it retrieves from_CHECKPOINT_FOR_DOC
.But we do have the class, and feature_extractors usually don't carry a lot of information (like
vocab.txt
with tokenizers I mean) so trying to instantiate with default arguments make sense to me. Otherwise we would need another indirection to makefrom_pretrained
work here.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok I see, makes sense!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There's a third bytes-level tokenizer, which is CANINE. Should this be added here too?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's a comment, I don't mind if it's not exhaustive. I think it clarifies enough the purpose of this line. Fine adding it though.