Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(roadmap.md): add roadmap with epics for next release #550 #716

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 15, 2021

Conversation

petermetz
Copy link
Contributor

@petermetz petermetz commented Mar 24, 2021

Dependencies

Depends on #656 (only so that the CI actually passes, not a code dependency since this is only a documentation change)

Commit to review

Author: Peter Somogyvari [email protected]
Committer: Peter Somogyvari [email protected]
Date: Tue Mar 23 2021 20:41:04 GMT-0700 (Pacific Daylight Time)

docs(roadmap.md): add roadmap with epics for next release #550

WORK IN PROGRESS

  • Epics need to be created in ZenHub still

Fixes #550

Signed-off-by: Peter Somogyvari [email protected]

@petermetz petermetz added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation Significant_Change Applying this label triggers the more stringent review of the maintainers and the 2+1 PR rule. labels Mar 24, 2021
@petermetz petermetz force-pushed the docs-550 branch 3 times, most recently from 7690ffa to 666e2c2 Compare March 24, 2021 03:48
@github-actions
Copy link

🎉 Great news! Looks like all the dependencies have been resolved:

💡 To add or remove a dependency please update this issue/PR description.

Brought to you by Dependent Issues (:robot: ). Happy coding!

@petermetz
Copy link
Contributor Author

@sfuji822 @takeutak Kindly requesting that you review or follow-up on the review discussion within this pull request (whichever is applicable). Thank you very much in advance.

@petermetz petermetz marked this pull request as ready for review April 25, 2021 15:24
@takeutak
Copy link
Contributor

@petermetz Thank you for posting. Sorry for my late reply.
As I said at Contributor's meeting, I think we need to consider the item list for V1.
I am very sorry, but I will have a holiday until next week and it is difficult for me to respond, but I plan to prepare a countermeasure plan as soon as possible after that. Could you wait for a moment, please?

@petermetz
Copy link
Contributor Author

@takeutak

@petermetz Thank you for posting. Sorry for my late reply.

It's okay.

As I said at Contributor's meeting, I think we need to consider the item list for V1.

Great. I said the same thing months ago and opened pull requests to try and move the discussion along.
Could you please include your proposed items here in the road map and then list the ones you deem necessary for V1?

I am very sorry, but I will have a holiday until next week and it is difficult for me to respond, but I plan to prepare a countermeasure plan as soon as possible after that. Could you wait for a moment, please?

No worries, enjoy your holiday, we can resume the conversation when you are back.

@petermetz
Copy link
Contributor Author

@takeutak +1

@takeutak
Copy link
Contributor

@petermetz Sorry for late reviewing this PR. I added checkpoints for V1-RC on Q3 and some task items as the commit aa61ee9 . Would you review it again?

ROADMAP.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@takeutak
Copy link
Contributor

@petermetz I added a plan of checkpoints for releasing V1-RC on the roadmap. But in order to ensure the quality of the code V1-RC, I'm sure that we need to arrange the task list for error handling and test cases before fixing the roadmap.
Could I discuss with you about this topic in the next week on some meeting?

ROADMAP.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@petermetz
Copy link
Contributor Author

petermetz commented Jun 26, 2021

@petermetz I added a plan of checkpoints for releasing V1-RC on the roadmap. But in order to ensure the quality of the code V1-RC, I'm sure that we need to arrange the task list for error handling and test cases before fixing the roadmap.
Could I discuss with you about this topic in the next week on some meeting?

@takeutak Agreed, automated tests with sufficient coverage are very important to me as well, happy to talk about it. In the meantime, could you please add these items to the roadmap so that we can have the the PR in a state where you are happy with it?

@petermetz
Copy link
Contributor Author

@takeutak Could you please squash your changes into a single commit before I merge?

@takeutak
Copy link
Contributor

takeutak commented Jul 1, 2021

@petermetz Thanks for comment. I will try to fix the typo and squash the commits soon. After doing it, I will contact you again.

@petermetz
Copy link
Contributor Author

@petermetz Thanks for comment. I will try to fix the typo and squash the commits soon. After doing it, I will contact you again.

@takeutak Thank you very much! If you need any help with the git squashing just let me know, happy to assist!

@takeutak
Copy link
Contributor

takeutak commented Jul 15, 2021

Could you please squash your changes into a single commit before I merge?

@petermetz Sorry for my late replying. I tried git squashing on this PR but failed due to the access right to your folk. Would you mind if you try to git squash?

petermetz and others added 2 commits July 15, 2021 10:38
…-cacti#550

WORK IN PROGRESS
- Epics need to be created in ZenHub still

Fixes hyperledger-cacti#550

Signed-off-by: Peter Somogyvari <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Takuma TAKEUCHI <[email protected]>

docs(roadmap): add the task lists for containizing and ensure quality

Signed-off-by: Takuma TAKEUCHI <[email protected]>
@petermetz
Copy link
Contributor Author

Could you please squash your changes into a single commit before I merge?

@petermetz Sorry for my late replying. I tried git squashing on this PR but failed due to the access right to your folk. Would you mind if you try to git squash?

@takeutak No worries, I did the squash just now. Thank you for the contributions to the roadmap!

@petermetz petermetz merged commit 4ef4290 into hyperledger-cacti:main Jul 15, 2021
@petermetz petermetz deleted the docs-550 branch July 15, 2021 21:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation Significant_Change Applying this label triggers the more stringent review of the maintainers and the 2+1 PR rule.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

docs(roadmap.md): Define a roadmap with major epics for next release
3 participants