Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature: README #19

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Dec 17, 2015
Merged

Feature: README #19

merged 10 commits into from
Dec 17, 2015

Conversation

vadymmarkov
Copy link
Contributor

@RamonGilabert
Copy link
Contributor

Looks good to me. @zenangst you want to review it?

URL to your `UIImageView`.
It does nothing but caching, but it does it well, having everything you expect
from this kind of library. It offers a good public API with out-of-box
implementations and great customization possibilities.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would change this paragraph to something like this;

It does nothing but caching, but it does it well. It offers a good public API with out-of-box implementations and great customization possibilities.

```

### Strict cache
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Strict cache sounds so harsh 😿
Should we call it Type safe cache instead? 😁

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@zenangst Type safe cache? Should the other one be unsafe then? 😄

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well, then I guess no one would use it ^^
But I think the other one makes sense, it's hybrid.

@zenangst
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes: #3

zenangst added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2015
@zenangst zenangst merged commit bc72cd4 into master Dec 17, 2015
@zenangst zenangst deleted the feature/readme branch December 17, 2015 12:48
@zenangst
Copy link
Contributor

@vadymmarkov 🎉

@pmiotto pmiotto mentioned this pull request Jul 3, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants