-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Simplifying analysis output #13
Comments
Also too many digits are being displayed making it overwhelming to view. |
Reduced a number of digits and made columns narrower. No option for hiding columns yet. |
There are many columns so making each one hidable will result in excessive UI. I suggest using some groups and show a checkbox for each like "random effects", "fixed effects" etc. I don't know what would be sensible grouping though. What do you suggest? |
We need like tool tips. And I need to write a key or legend. But we should definitely reorganize the columns. And maybe rename some. |
Just dump all the info here, I'll apply it to page somehow. |
Here is the package docs from R: http://www.inside-r.org/packages/cran/meta/docs/metacont |
I meant anything you want to rename, move, group. I could probaly extract some tooltips from there though. |
Gene, K, and case and control counts are most important. Next is pval and TE. We should rename TE to FC (Fold change) and in the tool tips note its log 2. Everything else can go after.
|
We should add the tool tips to the analysis columns. |
The analysis dataframe has lots of columns. I wonder if more is lost than gained by having so many fields. For example, would the fixed effects model ever be justified compared to the random effects model? Perhaps fixed effects could be removed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: