Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CI] Added check for raw MkDocs variables in the generated HTML #2559

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 21, 2025

Conversation

mnocon
Copy link
Contributor

@mnocon mnocon commented Nov 29, 2024

Added a check to make sure that raw variables do not end up in the generated doc.

I'm searching for [[=whatever=]] using regex - I think it's unlikely this will come up in the doc in other context than a variable that was wrongly included.

Passing commit: 51e8c45 (build: https://github.com/ibexa/documentation-developer/actions/runs/12090516880/job/33717609671)
Broken commit: 1b9b643 (build: https://github.com/ibexa/documentation-developer/actions/runs/12090540056/job/33717672329)

@mnocon mnocon marked this pull request as ready for review December 2, 2024 11:05
@mnocon mnocon requested a review from adriendupuis December 2, 2024 11:05
@mnocon mnocon merged commit 518769c into master Jan 21, 2025
6 checks passed
@mnocon mnocon deleted the verify-variables branch January 21, 2025 08:03
mnocon added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2025
* Revert "Revert "variables fix (#2555)""

This reverts commit 1b9b643.

* [CI] Added check for raw MkDocs variables in the generated HTML

* Revert "variables fix (#2555)"

This reverts commit 618066f.
mnocon added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2025
* Revert "Revert "variables fix (#2555)""

This reverts commit 1b9b643.

* [CI] Added check for raw MkDocs variables in the generated HTML

* Revert "variables fix (#2555)"

This reverts commit 618066f.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants