Now prints the "prompt" that was returned #132
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…t is and more easily compare the final notebook output with the input code in the prompt. Signed-off-by: Dean Wampler <[email protected]>
|
lgtm but first @fayvor shouldn't your cleaner be scrubbing the ids of this? |
rawkintrevo
approved these changes
Oct 8, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I like this recipe a lot.
This change lets the user see what the returned prompt actually is, which also makes it easier to compare the final doc output with the input code in the prompt.
Almost all the line differences are metadata from the notebook. (I cleared the output.) I'm not sure what to do about this, other than just accept it 🤷