You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Forwarded comments from Orie Steele, incoming ART Area Director:
"Recommendations for zone operators and DNS server operators"
Define "large / small" better.
"Protocol compliance considerations"
Would be nice to see reporting recommendations, perhaps that make the failure
an internal cost for the failing component?... would not want a repeat of dmarc
though.
--
"Recommendations for zone operators and DNS server operators"
For what it's worth, and warning! this is a small thing, I think "zone operators" is a bit vague.
The presumed intent of the phrase given the recommendations in the document is to identify people responsible for the choice of records in a DNS zone as part of the target audience. However, in my experience
"zone" has many meanings outside of the DNS
"zone" as a concept is poorly understood amongst people who fit the implied target audience but who are not protocol afficionados
"zone operator" is not a term of art and could (I think) mean different things to different people
I think the intended group is "people who publish information in the DNS".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
paulwouters
added a commit
to paulwouters/draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation
that referenced
this issue
Feb 12, 2024
Forwarded comments from Orie Steele, incoming ART Area Director:
"Recommendations for zone operators and DNS server operators"
"Protocol compliance considerations"
an internal cost for the failing component?... would not want a repeat of dmarc
though.
--
For what it's worth, and warning! this is a small thing, I think "zone operators" is a bit vague.
The presumed intent of the phrase given the recommendations in the document is to identify people responsible for the choice of records in a DNS zone as part of the target audience. However, in my experience
I think the intended group is "people who publish information in the DNS".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: