Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change parallel processing to doFuture throughout #18

Closed
3 tasks done
Martin-Jung opened this issue Oct 26, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed
3 tasks done

Change parallel processing to doFuture throughout #18

Martin-Jung opened this issue Oct 26, 2021 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Martin-Jung
Copy link
Collaborator

Martin-Jung commented Oct 26, 2021

The future package and its accompanying doFuture functionalities seems to be much richer and capable that doParallel.

  • Check where parallel processing is being used and where it could be
  • Change all parallel processing throughout the package and remove doParallel dependency
  • Make Options easier to use handling of cores and threads is more streamlined
@Martin-Jung Martin-Jung added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 26, 2021
@Martin-Jung
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Added ibis_future function and run_parallel in dd90776 and 02f7017

@Martin-Jung
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Martin-Jung commented Feb 20, 2022

  • Bug test this approach and make sure it actually works...

@Martin-Jung Martin-Jung added the bug Something isn't working label Apr 5, 2023
@Martin-Jung Martin-Jung self-assigned this Aug 18, 2024
Martin-Jung added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 22, 2024
* Parallel processing with future fixes

* Breg future done plus minor modal addition

* Part implemented (although sadly not working as planned)

* GDB updated for future

* Addition of future to glmnet

* Small FAQ vignette

* 🐛 fix for breg and added test #18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant