Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ignore missing logpyle imports #1093

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 17, 2024
Merged

Ignore missing logpyle imports #1093

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 17, 2024

Conversation

MTCam
Copy link
Member

@MTCam MTCam commented Dec 17, 2024

Questions for the review:

  • Is the scope and purpose of the PR clear?
    • The PR should have a description.
    • The PR should have a guide if needed (e.g., an ordering).
  • Is every top-level method and class documented? Are things that should be documented actually so?
  • Is the interface understandable? (I.e. can someone figure out what stuff does?) Is it well-defined?
  • Does the implementation do what the docstring claims?
  • Is everything that is implemented covered by tests?
  • Do you see any immediate risks or performance disadvantages with the design? Example: what do interface normals attach to?

@MTCam MTCam enabled auto-merge (squash) December 17, 2024 19:05
@MTCam MTCam requested review from majosm and anderson2981 December 17, 2024 19:06
@MTCam MTCam merged commit e281803 into main Dec 17, 2024
13 checks passed
@MTCam MTCam deleted the ingore-missing-imports branch December 17, 2024 21:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants