-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 174
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bind interface fix #310
Bind interface fix #310
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #310 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 73.12% 73.26% +0.13%
==========================================
Files 75 76 +1
Lines 3725 3725
==========================================
+ Hits 2724 2729 +5
+ Misses 867 857 -10
- Partials 134 139 +5
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Thanks for the PR @borna-blazevic! |
|
From where should I pass the interface in client_test.go? |
Which interface are you referring to? In From:
To:
|
For reference, this PR comes from coredhcp/coredhcp#40 |
Signed-off-by: borna_blazevic <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: borna-blazevic <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: borna_blazevic <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: borna-blazevic <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: borna_blazevic <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: borna-blazevic <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: borna-blazevic <[email protected]>
…some code. Signed-off-by: borna-blazevic <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: borna-blazevic <[email protected]>
@pmazzini made the changes you asked for. |
Thanks for addressing those comments. Travis is now showing a circular dependency:
How about moving I think that should solve the circular dependency problem. We can later see a better organization for it. Maybe creating a |
…er4/conn_linux.go Signed-off-by: borna-blazevic <[email protected]>
|
Signed-off-by: borna-blazevic <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: borna-blazevic <[email protected]>
lgtm after those 2 last comments |
Signed-off-by: borna-blazevic <[email protected]>
Can |
Signed-off-by: borna-blazevic <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for working on this @borna-blazevic! It looks ok to me.
Can you check if the v4 work that you are doing in coredhcp/coredhcp#40 works fine with this change?
I am not merging it yet to let other people have a look as well. |
Yes it works fine |
Created a new bind to interface function for v4 server, and altered v4 server.go to make it more consistent with the v6 server.