Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Investigate new event management Admin API #1521

Closed
mkurapov opened this issue Jun 23, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

Investigate new event management Admin API #1521

mkurapov opened this issue Jun 23, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
discussions: ideas Convert to an idea discussion

Comments

@mkurapov
Copy link
Contributor

Instead of using eventId in order to add/withdraw/deposit liquidity, we should consider using outgoingPaymentId and incomingPaymentId to move around liquidity.
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Backlog in Rafiki Jun 23, 2023
@mkurapov mkurapov added discussions: question Convert to a Q&A discussion discussions: ideas Convert to an idea discussion and removed discussions: question Convert to a Q&A discussion labels Jun 23, 2023
@mkurapov
Copy link
Contributor Author

CC @sabineschaller

@mkurapov mkurapov mentioned this issue Jun 23, 2023
Closed
3 tasks
@AlexLakatos AlexLakatos added this to the v1.0.0-alpha.3 milestone Jul 11, 2023
@sabineschaller
Copy link
Member

Yes, I agree. Event based always seemed weird to me. Do we then still need the view of all events?

@raducristianpopa raducristianpopa mentioned this issue Jul 24, 2023
Closed
@mkurapov mkurapov changed the title Scope out new event management Admin API Investigate new event management Admin API Jul 24, 2023
@mkurapov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@sabineschaller reposting my response in #1503:

We still would like the option to be able to view all of the different events that have been sent. The issue #1521 above is more concerned with how and by which parameter we want to track liquidity movement.

@interledger interledger locked and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 2, 2023
@sabineschaller sabineschaller converted this issue into discussion #1692 Aug 2, 2023
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Backlog to Done in Rafiki Aug 2, 2023

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
discussions: ideas Convert to an idea discussion
Projects
Rafiki
Archived in project
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@AlexLakatos @mkurapov @sabineschaller