Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

R4R: Add rewards query #1360

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 18, 2019
Merged

Conversation

chengwenxi
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@HaoyangLiu
Copy link

How about add querier interfaces in distribution module? You can refer to F1 distribution implementation.

@chengwenxi
Copy link
Contributor Author

How about add querier interfaces in distribution module? You can refer to F1 distribution implementation.

Will add querier interfaces and refactor all the distribution query API in next version, but the modification is too big for this version.

@chengwenxi chengwenxi changed the title WIP: Add rewards query R4R: Add rewards query Mar 18, 2019
@wukongcheng
Copy link
Contributor

It seems that this query interface will consume more calculation resources then others.

@chengwenxi
Copy link
Contributor Author

It seems that this query interface will consume more calculation resources then others.

Yes, so we'd better to refactor all the query API by adding querier interfaces in modules.

wukongcheng
wukongcheng previously approved these changes Mar 18, 2019
@chengwenxi chengwenxi changed the title R4R: Add rewards query WIP: Add rewards query Mar 18, 2019
@chengwenxi chengwenxi changed the title WIP: Add rewards query R4R: Add rewards query Mar 18, 2019
@chengwenxi chengwenxi requested review from haifengxi and wukongcheng and removed request for wukongcheng March 18, 2019 05:58
@wukongcheng wukongcheng merged commit 438ca5d into irisnet:release0.13 Mar 18, 2019
@chengwenxi chengwenxi deleted the reward-query branch March 21, 2019 07:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants