fix: increase timeout

[lodmfjord]

...

Attach a link to issue if relevant

What

Specify what you're trying to achieve

Why

Specify why you need to achieve this

Screenshots / Gifs

Attach Screenshots / Gifs to help reviewers understand the scope of the pull request

Checklist:

• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• My changes generate no new warnings
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• Formatting passes locally with my changes
• I have rebased against main before asking for a review

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate Limit Exceeded

@lodmfjord has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 30 minutes and 48 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.
Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.
Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d97292b and b65325c.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[saevarma]

🙈

[datadog-island-is]

Datadog Report

All test runs 984a9b3 🔗

✅ 24 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 23 Passed
➡️ Test Sessions change in coverage: 7 no change

Test Services

This report shows up to 10 services

Service Name	Failed	Known Flaky	New Flaky	Passed	Skipped	Total Time	Code Coverage Change	Test Service View
air-discount-scheme-backend	0	0	0	81	0	35.01s	N/A	Link
api	0	0	0	4	0	4.97s	1 no change	Link
api-domains-air-discount-scheme	0	0	0	6	0	44.28s	N/A	Link
api-domains-auth-admin	0	0	0	18	0	28.5s	N/A	Link
api-domains-driving-license	0	0	0	23	0	33.3s	N/A	Link
api-domains-license-service	0	0	0	0	0	1.07s	N/A	Link
application-api-files	0	0	0	12	0	17.41s	N/A	Link
application-system-api	0	0	0	111	2	2m 59.78s	1 no change	Link
application-template-api-modules	0	0	0	109	0	2m 31.1s	1 no change	Link
application-templates-public-debt-payment-plan	0	0	0	3	0	30.01s	N/A	Link

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 37.04%. Comparing base (d97292b) to head (b65325c).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #14885      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   37.04%   37.04%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        6331     6331              
  Lines      129125   129125              
  Branches    36858    36858              
==========================================
- Hits        47835    47833       -2     
- Misses      81290    81292       +2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
air-discount-scheme-backend	53.91% <ø> (ø)
api	3.48% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-air-discount-scheme	36.15% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-auth-admin	57.91% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-driving-license	44.57% <ø> (ø)
application-api-files	56.51% <ø> (ø)
application-system-api	41.95% <ø> (ø)
application-template-api-modules	24.37% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
application-ui-shell	21.72% <ø> (ø)
auth-api-lib	9.83% <ø> (ø)
clients-rsk-company-registry	29.24% <ø> (ø)
download-service	44.37% <ø> (ø)
license-api	43.20% <ø> (ø)
services-auth-admin-api	51.21% <ø> (ø)
services-auth-delegation-api	61.96% <ø> (ø)
services-auth-ids-api	54.36% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
services-auth-personal-representative	49.70% <ø> (ø)
services-auth-personal-representative-public	45.29% <ø> (ø)
services-auth-public-api	49.93% <ø> (ø)
services-sessions	65.37% <ø> (-0.05%)	⬇️
services-user-notification	47.79% <ø> (ø)
services-user-profile	62.85% <ø> (+0.07%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files	Coverage Δ
libs/cache/src/lib/cache.ts	47.29% <ø> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update d97292b...b65325c. Read the comment docs.