Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(j-s): Indictment decision tag on summary page #15378

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jul 1, 2024
Merged

Conversation

unakb
Copy link
Member

@unakb unakb commented Jun 27, 2024

Sýna niðurstöðu máls á staðfestingarskjá þegar verið er að ljúka máli

What

Display indictment ruling decision tag on the courts Summary page

Screenshots / Gifs

image image image image

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced color-coded tags to visually represent different ruling decisions for indictments.
  • Enhancements

    • Conditional rendering of tags based on the ruling decision of a case to improve clarity and user experience.

@unakb unakb requested a review from a team as a code owner June 27, 2024 14:31
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 27, 2024

Walkthrough

The updates focus on enhancing the indictment ruling summary within the judicial system's web application. A new message definition, indictmentRulingDecisionTagText, has been introduced along with a function, getRulingDecisionTagColor, to set tag colors based on decisions. A conditional Tag component displays indictment rulings.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Summary/Summary.strings.ts Added indictmentRulingDecisionTagText for different ruling decisions in indictments.
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Summary/Summary.tsx Introduced getRulingDecisionTagColor function, modified imports, and conditionally rendered Tag based on ruling.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant WebApp
    participant Summarizer

    User->>WebApp: Opens Indictment Summary
    WebApp->>Summarizer: Request indictment ruling decision
    Summarizer-->>WebApp: Provide indictment ruling decision
    WebApp->>WebApp: Invoke getRulingDecisionTagColor()
    WebApp->>WebApp: Render Tag component with appropriate color
    WebApp->>User: Display updated Summary with tag
Loading

Tip

Early access features: enabled

We are currently testing the following features in early access:

  • OpenAI gpt-4o model for code reviews and chat: OpenAI claims that this model is better at understanding and generating code than the previous models. We seek your feedback over the next few weeks before making it generally available.

Note:

  • You can enable or disable early access features from the CodeRabbit UI or by updating the CodeRabbit configuration file.
  • Please join our Discord Community to provide feedback and report issues.
  • OSS projects are currently opted into early access features by default.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@unakb unakb changed the title J s/tag indictment feat(j-s): Indictment decision tag on summary page Jun 27, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3e5dda8 and ea79fe4.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Summary/Summary.strings.ts (1 hunks)
  • apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Summary/Summary.tsx (3 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (2)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Summary/Summary.strings.ts (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Summary/Summary.tsx (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
Learnings (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Summary/Summary.tsx (1)
User: oddsson
PR: island-is/island.is#14673
File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/PublicProsecutor/Tables/CasesForReview.tsx:79-79
Timestamp: 2024-05-06T23:16:04.892Z
Learning: The implementation of `mapIndictmentCaseStateToTagVariant` in `TagCaseState.tsx`, which maps only `CaseState.ACCEPTED` to a specific tag and defaults others to an "unknown" status, is intentional as per the application's requirements.
Biome
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Summary/Summary.tsx

[error] 96-96: Useless case clause.

because the default clause is present:

Unsafe fix: Remove the useless case.

(lint/complexity/noUselessSwitchCase)

Additional comments not posted (3)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Summary/Summary.strings.ts (1)

41-46: Well-defined internationalization string for indictmentRulingDecisionTagText.

The addition of indictmentRulingDecisionTagText is correctly implemented with a comprehensive selection mechanism for different ruling decisions. This follows the established pattern of using react-intl for internationalization, ensuring consistency across the application.

apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Summary/Summary.tsx (2)

5-5: Updated import statement to include necessary components.

The import statement now correctly includes Tag and TagVariant from @island.is/island-ui/core, which are necessary for the new functionality related to displaying the indictment ruling decision tag.


115-128: Correct implementation of conditional rendering for the Tag component.

The Tag component is conditionally rendered based on workingCase.indictmentRulingDecision. This is a good use of conditional rendering to ensure that the UI elements are only shown when relevant data is available, adhering to best practices in React and NextJS for efficient rendering.

@datadog-island-is
Copy link

datadog-island-is bot commented Jun 27, 2024

Datadog Report

Branch report: j-s/tag-indictment
Commit report: 5772969
Test service: judicial-system-web

✅ 0 Failed, 317 Passed, 0 Skipped, 1m 4.81s Total Time
🔻 Test Sessions change in coverage: 1 decreased (-0.03%)

🔻 Code Coverage Decreases vs Default Branch (1)

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 27, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 14 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 37.05%. Comparing base (0c63fcf) to head (6653899).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Current head 6653899 differs from pull request most recent head 7002687

Please upload reports for the commit 7002687 to get more accurate results.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #15378      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   37.05%   37.05%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        6539     6539              
  Lines      133181   133174       -7     
  Branches    38165    38165              
==========================================
- Hits        49349    49345       -4     
+ Misses      83832    83829       -3     
Flag Coverage Δ
api 3.44% <ø> (ø)
application-system-api 42.07% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
application-template-api-modules 24.06% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
application-templates-financial-aid 12.14% <ø> (ø)
application-ui-shell 21.62% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-web 28.28% <0.00%> (-0.03%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Coverage Δ
...outes/Court/Indictments/Summary/Summary.strings.ts 0.00% <ø> (ø)
...b/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Summary/Summary.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

... and 6 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 11ff333...7002687. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Member

@oddsson oddsson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it looks a bit cleaner to have the tag bottom aligned with the title, like so

Screenshot 2024-06-27 at 22 34 24

What do you think? Consider changing this, just give me a heads up if you do so I can update Figma :)

@unakb unakb added the deprecated:automerge (Disabled) Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass label Jul 1, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ea79fe4 and 7002687.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Summary/Summary.tsx (3 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Summary/Summary.tsx (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
Learnings (2)
Common learnings
Learnt from: unakb
PR: island-is/island.is#15378
File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Summary/Summary.tsx:86-100
Timestamp: 2024-06-27T14:37:07.823Z
Learning: User unakb prefers explicit case handling in switch statements for key functionalities like `getRulingDecisionTagColor` to ensure clarity and avoid assumptions that a case was overlooked.
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Summary/Summary.tsx (2)
Learnt from: unakb
PR: island-is/island.is#15378
File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Summary/Summary.tsx:86-100
Timestamp: 2024-06-27T14:37:07.823Z
Learning: User unakb prefers explicit case handling in switch statements for key functionalities like `getRulingDecisionTagColor` to ensure clarity and avoid assumptions that a case was overlooked.
Learnt from: oddsson
PR: island-is/island.is#14673
File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/PublicProsecutor/Tables/CasesForReview.tsx:79-79
Timestamp: 2024-05-06T23:16:04.892Z
Learning: The implementation of `mapIndictmentCaseStateToTagVariant` in `TagCaseState.tsx`, which maps only `CaseState.ACCEPTED` to a specific tag and defaults others to an "unknown" status, is intentional as per the application's requirements.
Biome
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Summary/Summary.tsx

[error] 96-96: Useless case clause.

because the default clause is present:

Unsafe fix: Remove the useless case.

(lint/complexity/noUselessSwitchCase)

Additional comments not posted (3)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Summary/Summary.tsx (3)

5-5: LGTM!

The import statement changes are approved.


86-100: Retain the explicit case for clarity.

While the static analysis tool suggests removing the redundant case, retaining the explicit case for CaseIndictmentRulingDecision.RULING ensures clarity that this decision is intentionally handled.

Tools
Biome

[error] 96-96: Useless case clause.

because the default clause is present:

Unsafe fix: Remove the useless case.

(lint/complexity/noUselessSwitchCase)


115-131: LGTM!

The JSX structure changes to conditionally render the Tag component are approved.

@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit e251d82 into main Jul 1, 2024
24 checks passed
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the j-s/tag-indictment branch July 1, 2024 14:00
snaerseljan pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 2, 2024
* feat(j-s): Indictment ruling decision tag on Summary page

* Update Summary.tsx

* Move ruling decision down

---------

Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 7, 2024
6 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
deprecated:automerge (Disabled) Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants