Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(web): signature collection link fix #16169

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 26, 2024
Merged

fix(web): signature collection link fix #16169

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 26, 2024

Conversation

albinagu
Copy link
Member

@albinagu albinagu commented Sep 26, 2024

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Dynamic URL generation for links in the Signature Lists component based on the isPresidential property, enhancing user navigation experience.

@albinagu albinagu requested a review from a team as a code owner September 26, 2024 11:43
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 26, 2024

Walkthrough

The change updates the URL construction logic in the onClick handler of a component within the SignatureLists.tsx file. It introduces a conditional check based on the isPresidential property of the collection object, allowing the URL to dynamically point to either maela-med-frambodi or maela-med-althingisframbodi depending on the context.

Changes

File Change Summary
libs/shared/connected/src/lib/SignatureLists/... Modified URL construction logic in onClick handler to use conditional checks.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

automerge

Suggested reviewers

  • juni-haukur

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@albinagu albinagu added the deprecated:automerge (Disabled) Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass label Sep 26, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
libs/shared/connected/src/lib/SignatureLists/SignatureLists.tsx (1)

Line range hint 1-153: Enhance documentation for library consumers

The component adheres well to TypeScript best practices and is designed for reusability across different NextJS apps. However, to fully comply with the coding guidelines for shared libraries, consider the following enhancement:

Add documentation and usage examples at the top of the file to assist library consumers. This could include:

  • A brief description of the component's purpose
  • An example of how to use the component
  • Description of the props and their types
  • Any important notes about the component's behavior, especially regarding the new URL generation logic

For example:

/**
 * SignatureLists Component
 * 
 * This component displays a list of signature collections for presidential or parliamentary candidates.
 * It dynamically generates URLs based on the type of collection (presidential or parliamentary).
 * 
 * @example
 * <SignatureLists slice={connectedComponentData} />
 * 
 * @prop {ConnectedComponent} slice - The data for the connected component
 * 
 * @note The URL generation for each candidate's signature collection link depends on the `isPresidential`
 * property of the collection. This determines whether to use 'maela-med-frambodi' or 'maela-med-althingisframbodi'
 * in the URL path.
 */

This documentation will help other developers understand and correctly use the component in different parts of the application.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b78609d and 7b29f06.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • libs/shared/connected/src/lib/SignatureLists/SignatureLists.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
libs/shared/connected/src/lib/SignatureLists/SignatureLists.tsx (2)

Pattern libs/shared/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Cross-application utility functions, types, and constants.
  • TypeScript best practices to ensure type safety and reusability.
  • Documentation and examples for library consumers."

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🔇 Additional comments (1)
libs/shared/connected/src/lib/SignatureLists/SignatureLists.tsx (1)

118-122: Approved: Improved URL generation logic

The changes improve the flexibility of the component by dynamically generating the URL based on the isPresidential property. This aligns well with the PR objective of fixing the signature collection link.

Consider adding a comment or updating the documentation to explain the significance of the isPresidential property and its impact on the URL generation. This will help future developers understand the logic behind this conditional statement.

Let's verify if this change impacts other parts of the application:

This will help ensure that the change is consistent across the application and identify any other places that might need similar updates.

✅ Verification successful

Next Step: Re-verify URL Generation across the Codebase

The previous search command failed due to an unrecognized file type. Let's use the correct file type to ensure .tsx files are included in the search.


Next Step: Re-verify URL Generation Across .tsx Files

The previous search command failed due to an unrecognized file type. Let's target .tsx files specifically using a glob pattern to ensure all relevant files are searched.


Verification Complete: No Additional Impact Found

The search confirmed that 'maela-med-frambodi' and 'maela-med-althingisframbodi' are only used within SignatureLists.tsx. This ensures that the URL generation logic change is localized and does not affect other parts of the application.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for other occurrences of 'maela-med-frambodi' or 'maela-med-althingisframbodi'
rg --type typescript -e 'maela-med-frambodi' -e 'maela-med-althingisframbodi'

Length of output: 110


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for other occurrences of 'maela-med-frambodi' or 'maela-med-althingisframbodi' in TypeScript React files
rg --type typescriptreact -e 'maela-med-frambodi' -e 'maela-med-althingisframbodi'

Length of output: 120


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for other occurrences of 'maela-med-frambodi' or 'maela-med-althingisframbodi' in .tsx files
rg 'maela-med-frambodi|maela-med-althingisframbodi' --glob '*.tsx'

Length of output: 319

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 26, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 36.69%. Comparing base (b78609d) to head (e9885e5).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #16169   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   36.69%   36.69%           
=======================================
  Files        6776     6776           
  Lines      139578   139578           
  Branches    39678    39678           
=======================================
  Hits        51222    51222           
  Misses      88356    88356           
Flag Coverage Δ
web 1.83% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b78609d...e9885e5. Read the comment docs.

@datadog-island-is
Copy link

datadog-island-is bot commented Sep 26, 2024

Datadog Report

All test runs 582572c 🔗

3 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 2 Passed
➡️ Test Sessions change in coverage: 23 no change

Test Services
Service Name Failed Known Flaky New Flaky Passed Skipped Total Time Code Coverage Change Test Service View
service-portal-core 0 0 0 5 0 1.84s N/A Link
service-portal-health 0 0 0 0 0 517.58ms 1 no change Link
web 0 0 0 84 0 28.53s 1 no change Link

@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit ef69855 into main Sep 26, 2024
44 checks passed
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the sc_web_linkfix branch September 26, 2024 11:57
thoreyjona pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2024
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
deprecated:automerge (Disabled) Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants