feat(signature-collection): Signature lookup for admin #16232
Conversation
WalkthroughA new input type class named Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
juni-haukur
added
the
deprecated:automerge
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
libs/api/domains/signature-collection/src/lib/dto/signatureLookup.input.ts (1)
6-11: LGTM: Property definitions are well-structured. Consider adding comments for clarity.The
collectionIdandnationalIdproperties are correctly defined with appropriate decorators:
@Field()exposes them in the GraphQL schema.@IsString()ensures proper validation.- The use of the definite assignment assertion (
!) correctly indicates these fields are required.This structure adheres to TypeScript best practices and supports effective GraphQL schema generation.
Consider adding brief comments to describe the purpose of each field, which could enhance code readability and maintainability. For example:
@Field() @IsString() collectionId!: string; // Unique identifier for the signature collection @Field() @IsString() nationalId!: string; // National ID of the individual whose signature is being looked uplibs/api/domains/signature-collection/src/lib/signatureCollectionAdmin.service.ts (1)
201-210: LGTM: NewsignatureLookupmethod implemented correctly.The new
signatureLookupmethod is well-implemented and consistent with the existing code style and patterns in the class. It correctly uses async/await, maintains proper authentication by including theUserparameter, and adheres to TypeScript usage for defining props and types.Consider adding error handling to catch and properly handle any potential errors from the client service call. For example:
async signatureLookup( user: User, input: SignatureCollectionSignatureLookupInput, ): Promise<SignatureCollectionSignature[]> { try { return await this.signatureCollectionClientService.signatureLookup( user, input.collectionId, input.nationalId, ); } catch (error) { // Log the error or handle it appropriately console.error('Error in signatureLookup:', error); throw error; // or return an empty array, depending on your error handling strategy } }This will improve the robustness of the method and make debugging easier in case of errors.
libs/clients/signature-collection/src/lib/signature-collection-admin.service.ts (1)
331-353: Good implementation with room for improvementThe
signatureLookupmethod is well-implemented, adhering to TypeScript usage and promoting code reuse. It effectively utilizes existing methods and APIs, contributing to the overall reusability of the codebase.However, there are a few areas that could be improved:
Error handling could be more specific. Currently, it catches all errors and returns an empty array, which might hide important issues.
Input parameter validation is missing, which could lead to runtime errors if invalid inputs are provided.
Consider the following improvements:
- Implement more specific error handling:
try { // ... existing code ... } catch (error) { console.error('Error in signatureLookup:', error); if (error instanceof ApiError) { // Handle API-specific errors return []; } throw error; // Re-throw unexpected errors }
- Add input parameter validation:
if (!auth || !collectionId || !nationalId) { throw new Error('Missing required parameters'); } if (typeof collectionId !== 'string' || typeof nationalId !== 'string') { throw new Error('Invalid parameter types'); }These changes will improve the robustness and maintainability of the method.
libs/api/domains/signature-collection/src/lib/signatureCollectionAdmin.resolver.ts (1)
268-279: LGTM: New query method is well-structured and follows existing patterns.The
signatureCollectionSignatureLookupmethod is correctly implemented with appropriate decorators and TypeScript usage. It adheres to the coding guidelines for reusability and type safety.For consistency with other methods in this class, consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of this new query method.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- libs/api/domains/signature-collection/src/lib/dto/signatureLookup.input.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/api/domains/signature-collection/src/lib/signatureCollectionAdmin.resolver.ts (2 hunks)
- libs/api/domains/signature-collection/src/lib/signatureCollectionAdmin.service.ts (2 hunks)
- libs/clients/signature-collection/src/lib/signature-collection-admin.service.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (4)
libs/api/domains/signature-collection/src/lib/dto/signatureLookup.input.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/api/domains/signature-collection/src/lib/signatureCollectionAdmin.resolver.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/api/domains/signature-collection/src/lib/signatureCollectionAdmin.service.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/clients/signature-collection/src/lib/signature-collection-admin.service.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🔇 Additional comments (6)
libs/api/domains/signature-collection/src/lib/dto/signatureLookup.input.ts (3)
1-2: LGTM: Import statements are concise and follow best practices.The import statements are correctly importing only the necessary items from 'class-validator' and '@nestjs/graphql'. This approach supports effective tree-shaking and bundling practices.
4-5: LGTM: Class definition adheres to GraphQL and TypeScript best practices.The
SignatureCollectionSignatureLookupInputclass is correctly defined as an exported GraphQL input type. The naming convention and use of the@InputType()decorator are appropriate. This structure supports reusability across different NextJS apps and proper TypeScript usage for GraphQL schemas.
1-12: Overall assessment: Well-structured and adheres to best practices.This new file,
signatureLookup.input.ts, successfully implements a GraphQL input type for signature lookup. It demonstrates:
- Proper use of TypeScript and GraphQL decorators.
- Adherence to coding guidelines for reusability across NextJS apps.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices through specific imports.
- Clear and type-safe property definitions.
The implementation is correct, maintainable, and aligns well with the project's coding standards. The minor suggestion to add comments for each property is the only recommended improvement.
libs/api/domains/signature-collection/src/lib/signatureCollectionAdmin.service.ts (2)
25-26: LGTM: New imports added correctly.The new imports for
SignatureCollectionNationalIdInputandSignatureCollectionSignatureLookupInputare correctly added and follow the existing import style in the file. These imports suggest that new DTOs have been created for the signature lookup functionality, which is good for type safety and code organization.
Line range hint
1-210: Summary: Changes align well with PR objectives and coding guidelines.The modifications to
SignatureCollectionAdminServicesuccessfully enhance the signature lookup functionality for admin use, aligning with the PR objectives. The newsignatureLookupmethod and its associated imports are well-implemented and consistent with the existing code style.The changes adhere to the coding guidelines for
libs/**/*:
- The code maintains reusability across different NextJS apps as it's part of a shared library.
- TypeScript is effectively used for defining props and types, enhancing type safety.
- The new method follows the existing patterns, which likely supports effective tree-shaking and bundling practices.
Overall, this is a well-implemented feature addition that maintains the quality and consistency of the codebase.
libs/api/domains/signature-collection/src/lib/signatureCollectionAdmin.resolver.ts (1)
38-38: LGTM: Import statement is correctly placed and follows the existing pattern.The new import for
SignatureCollectionSignatureLookupInputis appropriately added and aligns with the file's import structure.
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #16232 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 36.93% 36.88% -0.05%
==========================================
Files 6781 6787 +6
Lines 140002 139907 -95
Branches 39809 39789 -20
==========================================
- Hits 51703 51602 -101
- Misses 88299 88305 +6
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
... and 48 files with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
Datadog ReportAll test runs ✅ 4 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 4 Passed Test Services
🔻 Code Coverage Decreases vs Default Branch (2) |
kodiakhq
bot
removed
the
deprecated:automerge
|
This PR currently has a merge conflict. Please resolve this and then re-add the |
juni-haukur
added
the
deprecated:automerge
kodiakhq
bot
removed
the
deprecated:automerge
|
This PR currently has a merge conflict. Please resolve this and then re-add the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- libs/api/domains/signature-collection/src/lib/signatureCollectionAdmin.resolver.ts (2 hunks)
- libs/api/domains/signature-collection/src/lib/signatureCollectionAdmin.service.ts (2 hunks)
- libs/clients/signature-collection/src/lib/signature-collection-admin.service.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- libs/api/domains/signature-collection/src/lib/signatureCollectionAdmin.resolver.ts
- libs/api/domains/signature-collection/src/lib/signatureCollectionAdmin.service.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
libs/clients/signature-collection/src/lib/signature-collection-admin.service.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/clients/signature-collection/src/lib/signature-collection-admin.service.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
juni-haukur
added
the
deprecated:automerge
...
Attach a link to issue if relevant
What
Specify what you're trying to achieve
Why
Specify why you need to achieve this
Screenshots / Gifs
Attach Screenshots / Gifs to help reviewers understand the scope of the pull request
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes