chore(j-s): Send notifications when subpoena changes #16329
Conversation
…cations-defendant-selected-defender
…cations-defendant-selected-defender
…cations-defendant-selected-defender
…cations-defendant-selected-defender
…cations-defendant-selected-defender
…cations-defendant-selected-defender
Datadog ReportAll test runs ❌ 72 Total Test Services: 1 Failed, 68 Passed Test ServicesThis report shows up to 10 services
❌ Failed Tests (3)
🔻 Code Coverage Decreases vs Default Branch (3) |
…cations-defendant-selected-defender
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request introduce the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
oddsson
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (12)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/dto/notificationBody.dto.ts (1)
18-21: LGTM:subpoenaIdproperty is well-defined as an optional UUID.The
subpoenaIdproperty is correctly implemented, mirroring the structure ofprosecutorsOfficeId:
- Appropriate type (optional string)
- Proper validation using
@IsOptional()and@IsUUID()- Swagger documentation using
@ApiPropertyOptional()This ensures consistency in handling optional UUID fields.
Consider creating a custom decorator to encapsulate this common pattern of optional UUID fields, adhering to the DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principle. For example:
function OptionalUUID() { return applyDecorators( IsOptional(), IsUUID(), ApiPropertyOptional({ type: String }) ); } // Usage: @OptionalUUID() readonly subpoenaId?: string;This would make the code more maintainable and reduce the likelihood of inconsistencies in future additions.
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/subpoena.module.ts (2)
21-21: MessageModule added to imports with forwardRefThe MessageModule has been added to the imports array using forwardRef. This approach is correct when dealing with circular dependencies between modules.
While this solves the immediate issue of circular dependencies, it's worth considering if this circular dependency is necessary or if it could be refactored to have a more linear dependency graph. This could improve the overall architecture and make the system easier to maintain and understand in the long run.
Line range hint
1-33: Overall module structure remains consistentThe changes to this module (adding MessageModule) have been implemented without disrupting the existing structure. The module continues to follow NestJS best practices for module definition, including proper use of decorators, imports, controllers, providers, and exports.
Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of the MessageModule in this context, especially if it's not immediately obvious why it's needed in the Subpoena module. This would improve code readability and maintainability.
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/notification.module.ts (1)
36-36: LGTM: Module configuration updated correctly.The addition of
SubpoenaModuleto imports andSubpoenaNotificationServiceto providers is correct and consistent with the new functionality. The use offorwardRefforSubpoenaModuleappropriately handles potential circular dependencies.Consider adding a comment explaining the reason for using
forwardRefwithSubpoenaModuleto improve code maintainability.Also applies to: 49-49
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/limitedAccessSubpoena.controller.ts (2)
51-51: Approved: API tag update improves accuracyThe change from 'limited access defendants' to 'limited access subpoenas' in the
@ApiTagsdecorator accurately reflects the controller's focus on subpoenas. This update enhances the clarity of the API documentation.Consider using a constant for the tag value to ensure consistency across the codebase:
const API_TAGS = { LIMITED_ACCESS_SUBPOENAS: 'limited access subpoenas', // ... other tags }; @ApiTags(API_TAGS.LIMITED_ACCESS_SUBPOENAS)This approach would make it easier to maintain and update API tags consistently throughout the application.
Line range hint
1-89: Overall structure and implementation reviewThe
LimitedAccessSubpoenaControllerdemonstrates good adherence to NestJS and TypeScript best practices:
- Proper use of decorators for routing, guards, and API documentation.
- Effective use of dependency injection for services.
- Strong typing with TypeScript throughout the controller.
- Clear separation of concerns with focused functionality for subpoena retrieval.
Consider the following suggestions to further improve the code:
- Error Handling: Implement global exception filters or add try-catch blocks to handle potential errors gracefully.
- Logging: Enhance logging to cover both successful operations and potential errors for better observability.
- Input Validation: Consider adding DTO (Data Transfer Object) classes with class-validator decorators for robust input validation.
Example of enhanced error handling and logging:
@Get() async getSubpoenaPdf( // ... existing parameters ): Promise<void> { try { this.logger.debug(`Getting subpoena ${subpoenaId} for defendant ${defendantId} of case ${caseId}`) const pdf = await this.pdfService.getSubpoenaPdf(theCase, defendant, subpoena) res.end(pdf) this.logger.info(`Successfully retrieved subpoena ${subpoenaId}`) } catch (error) { this.logger.error(`Error retrieving subpoena ${subpoenaId}: ${error.message}`) throw new InternalServerErrorException('Failed to retrieve subpoena') } }These enhancements would improve the robustness and maintainability of the controller.
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/subpoenaNotification.strings.ts (2)
3-43: Overall structure is good, but some descriptions need updating.The
stringsobject is well-structured, and the use ofdefineMessagefor internationalization is correct. However, some descriptions need to be updated to accurately reflect the content of the messages:
For
serviceFailedSubject,serviceFailedBody,defendantSelectedDefenderSubject, anddefendantSelectedDefenderBody, the descriptions incorrectly state "when the serive status in an indictment has changed". These should be updated to reflect the specific scenarios they represent.There's a typo in the word "serive" in all descriptions. It should be "service".
Consider updating the descriptions to accurately reflect each message's purpose. For example:
defendantSelectedDefenderSubject: defineMessage({ id: 'judicial.system.backend:subpoena_notifications.defendant_selected_defender_subject', defaultMessage: 'Val á verjanda í máli {courtCaseNumber}', description: 'Subject of the notification sent when a defendant has selected a defender', }),
1-43: Internationalization practices are well-implemented.The use of
defineMessageand placeholders is consistent with best practices for internationalization. Theidvalues are descriptive and follow a good hierarchical structure.Note that some messages contain HTML tags (e.g.,
<br />and{linkStart}...{linkEnd}). Ensure that the component rendering these messages can properly handle HTML content. Consider adding a comment in the file to remind developers about this requirement:// Note: Some messages contain HTML tags. Ensure proper rendering in the UI components.apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/institutionNotification.service.ts (1)
49-54: LGTM with a minor suggestion for clarityThe changes to make
prosecutorsOfficeIdoptional and add a conditional check are good improvements. They enhance the flexibility of the method while maintaining type safety.Consider adding a comment explaining why we return early when
prosecutorsOfficeIdis not provided. This would improve code readability. For example:if (!prosecutorsOfficeId) { // Early return if no prosecutorsOfficeId is provided, as it's required for further processing return }apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/subpoena.service.ts (3)
55-68: Add Explicit Return Types to Methods for Better Type SafetyAdding explicit return types to the
isSuccessfulServiceStatusandisFailedServiceStatusmethods enhances readability and type safety.Apply the following changes:
-private isSuccessfulServiceStatus(serviceStatus?: ServiceStatus) { +private isSuccessfulServiceStatus(serviceStatus?: ServiceStatus): boolean { return ( serviceStatus && [ ServiceStatus.ELECTRONICALLY, ServiceStatus.DEFENDER, ServiceStatus.IN_PERSON, ].includes(serviceStatus) ) } -private isFailedServiceStatus(serviceStatus?: ServiceStatus) { +private isFailedServiceStatus(serviceStatus?: ServiceStatus): boolean { return serviceStatus && serviceStatus === ServiceStatus.FAILED }
156-174: Consider Awaiting thesendMessagesToQueueCallSince
sendMessagesToQueuereturns a promise, consider usingawaitto ensure proper error handling and that the message dispatch completes before proceeding.Apply the following change:
- this.messageService + await this.messageService .sendMessagesToQueue([ { type: MessageType.NOTIFICATION, body: { type: notificationType, subpoenaId: subpoena.subpoenaId, }, }, ])If the intention is to fire-and-forget, explicitly indicate this:
- this.messageService + void this.messageService .sendMessagesToQueue([ // ... ])
55-68: Add Unit Tests for New Helper MethodsInclude unit tests for
isSuccessfulServiceStatusandisFailedServiceStatusto ensure they handle allServiceStatuscases correctly.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/dto/institutionNotification.dto.ts (0 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/dto/notificationBody.dto.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/institutionNotification.service.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/internalNotification.controller.ts (4 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/notification.module.ts (4 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/subpoenaNotification.service.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/subpoenaNotification.strings.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/limitedAccessSubpoena.controller.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/subpoena.module.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/subpoena.service.ts (4 hunks)
- libs/judicial-system/types/src/lib/notification.ts (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/dto/institutionNotification.dto.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (10)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/dto/notificationBody.dto.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/institutionNotification.service.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/internalNotification.controller.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/notification.module.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/subpoenaNotification.service.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/subpoenaNotification.strings.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/limitedAccessSubpoena.controller.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/subpoena.module.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/subpoena.service.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
libs/judicial-system/types/src/lib/notification.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🔇 Additional comments (21)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/dto/notificationBody.dto.ts (5)
1-5: LGTM: Imports are well-organized and follow best practices.The imports are correctly structured, importing only the necessary decorators and types. The use of a custom type import (
NotificationType) suggests good modularization of the codebase.
7-7: LGTM: Class declaration follows DTO naming convention.The
NotificationBodyDtoclass is correctly named and exported, following the Data Transfer Object (DTO) pattern and allowing its use throughout the application.
8-11: LGTM:typeproperty is well-defined and properly validated.The
typeproperty is correctly implemented with:
- Appropriate type (
NotificationType)- Proper validation using
@IsNotEmpty()and@IsEnum()- Swagger documentation using
@ApiProperty()This ensures type safety, enforces data integrity, and provides clear API documentation.
13-16: LGTM:prosecutorsOfficeIdproperty is well-defined as an optional UUID.The
prosecutorsOfficeIdproperty is correctly implemented with:
- Appropriate type (optional string)
- Proper validation using
@IsOptional()and@IsUUID()- Swagger documentation using
@ApiPropertyOptional()This allows for flexibility in the DTO while ensuring that when provided, the value is a valid UUID.
1-22: Overall, excellent implementation of the NotificationBodyDto.This DTO is well-structured and follows TypeScript and NestJS best practices:
- Proper use of decorators for validation and API documentation
- Clear type definitions and appropriate use of optionals
- Adherence to naming conventions and modular design principles
The implementation aligns well with the coding guidelines, particularly in terms of TypeScript usage for type safety and efficient state management. It provides a solid foundation for handling notification-related data in the judicial system application.
libs/judicial-system/types/src/lib/notification.ts (1)
21-23: LGTM! The new enum members are well-defined and consistent.The additions to the
NotificationTypeenum are appropriate and follow the existing naming conventions. They enhance the notification system's functionality and adhere to the coding guidelines for thelibsdirectory:
- The new types improve reusability across different NextJS apps by providing more specific notification scenarios.
- The enum is properly exported, aligning with TypeScript usage for defining and exporting types.
- These additions support effective tree-shaking and bundling practices by keeping related types together in a single enum.
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/subpoena.module.ts (1)
4-5: New import added for MessageModuleThe addition of the MessageModule import from '@island.is/judicial-system/message' suggests that messaging functionality is being integrated into the Subpoena module. This change appears to be in line with modular design principles.
To ensure this import is used correctly throughout the module, let's verify its usage:
✅ Verification successful
MessageModule is properly imported and utilized
MessageModule is correctly imported and used in the SubpoenaModule. The usage in
forwardRefensures proper handling of potential circular dependencies.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of MessageModule in the subpoena module # Test: Search for MessageModule usage in the subpoena module rg --type typescript 'MessageModule' apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoenaLength of output: 125
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of MessageModule in the subpoena module using file extensions # Test: Search for MessageModule usage in TypeScript files within the subpoena module rg 'MessageModule' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoenaLength of output: 351
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/notification.module.ts (3)
16-16: LGTM: Import statement addition is correct.The addition of
SubpoenaModuleto the imports is consistent with the module's new functionality and follows the established naming and import conventions.
26-26: LGTM: SubpoenaNotificationService import added correctly.The import of
SubpoenaNotificationServiceis consistent with the module's new functionality and follows the established naming and import conventions.
Line range hint
1-53: Overall, the changes look good and are well-implemented.The modifications to the
NotificationModuleare consistent with the PR objectives and follow best practices for Nest.js and TypeScript. The integration of the newSubpoenaModuleandSubpoenaNotificationServiceis done correctly, maintaining the module's structure and dependency management.apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/subpoenaNotification.strings.ts (2)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement is correct.The import of
defineMessagefrom '@formatjs/intl' is appropriate for internationalization purposes.
1-43: LGTM: File is well-structured and follows internationalization best practices.Overall, this file is well-implemented and follows good practices for internationalization. The suggested improvements are minor:
- Update some message descriptions for accuracy.
- Add a note about HTML content in messages.
These changes will enhance maintainability but don't affect functionality. The file is approved for merging.
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/institutionNotification.service.ts (2)
94-94: LGTM: Changes are consistent and maintain type safetyThe modification to make
prosecutorsOfficeIdoptional in thesendNotificationmethod signature is consistent with the changes insendIndictmentsWaitingForConfirmationNotification. This change maintains type safety while allowing for more flexible usage of the method.
Line range hint
1-118: Overall assessment: Changes improve flexibility while maintaining best practicesThe modifications to the
InstitutionNotificationServiceclass enhance its flexibility by making theprosecutorsOfficeIdparameter optional in bothsendIndictmentsWaitingForConfirmationNotificationandsendNotificationmethods. These changes:
- Adhere to NextJS best practices and maintain the existing file structure.
- Improve TypeScript type safety by properly handling the optional parameter.
- Don't introduce any issues with state management or server-side rendering.
The code changes are consistent throughout the file and align well with the provided coding guidelines for the
apps/**/*pattern.apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/internalNotification.controller.ts (5)
22-22: ImportingNotificationBodyDtoThe import statement correctly brings in the new
NotificationBodyDtoclass, ensuring that the updated DTO is used in the controller methods.
27-27: ImportingSubpoenaNotificationServiceThe
SubpoenaNotificationServiceis appropriately imported, which is necessary for handling subpoena notifications within the controller.
37-37: InjectingSubpoenaNotificationServiceinto the controllerThe
SubpoenaNotificationServiceis correctly injected into theInternalNotificationControllerconstructor, allowing it to be utilized in thesendNotificationmethod.
69-69: Updating parameter type toNotificationBodyDtoinsendNotificationmethodThe
sendNotificationmethod now correctly usesNotificationBodyDtoas its parameter type, reflecting the updated structure of the notification data.
90-90: Updating parameter type toNotificationBodyDtoindispatchNotificationmethodThe
dispatchNotificationmethod has been updated to acceptNotificationBodyDto, ensuring consistency in the DTOs used across the controller.apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/subpoena.service.ts (2)
47-47: Verify Dependency Injection ofmessageServiceEnsure that the
MessageServiceis properly registered and injected in the module to avoid runtime errors related to NestJS dependency injection.
151-155: Ensure Comprehensive Condition Coverage in Notification LogicVerify that all relevant
serviceStatusvalues and defender choices are accounted for in the conditional statement to prevent missing any notification scenarios.
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/internalNotification.controller.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/subpoenaNotification.service.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/subpoenaNotification.service.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/subpoenaNotification.service.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/subpoenaNotification.service.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/subpoena.service.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/subpoenaNotification.service.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/subpoenaNotification.service.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…cations-defendant-selected-defender
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/subpoena.service.ts (1)
Line range hint
115-185: LGTM with suggestion: Update method enhanced with notification logicThe new logic for determining
notificationTypeand sending notifications is well-implemented. However, consider the following suggestion:The current implementation tolerates failures when sending notifications. While this prevents the update process from failing, it might lead to missed notifications. Consider implementing a retry mechanism or a more robust error handling strategy to ensure important notifications are not lost.
Example:
if (notificationType) { try { await this.messageService.sendMessagesToQueue([ { type: MessageType.SUBPOENA_NOTIFICATION, body: { type: notificationType, subpoena, }, }, ]); } catch (error) { this.logger.error('Failed to dispatch notifications', { error }); // Consider implementing a retry mechanism here // or storing failed notifications for later processing } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/internalNotification.controller.ts (3 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/subpoenaNotification.service.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/limitedAccessSubpoena.controller.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/subpoena.service.ts (5 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/internalNotification.controller.ts
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/subpoenaNotification.service.ts
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/limitedAccessSubpoena.controller.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/subpoena.service.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
📓 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: oddsson PR: island-is/island.is#16329 File: apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/subpoenaNotification.service.ts:0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-15T10:31:27.440Z Learning: In `apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/subpoena.service.ts`, the method `findBySubpoenaId` throws an error if the subpoena is not found. Therefore, downstream code does not need to check if the result is undefined.Learnt from: oddsson PR: island-is/island.is#16329 File: apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/subpoenaNotification.service.ts:143-177 Timestamp: 2024-10-15T21:11:15.520Z Learning: In `apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/subpoenaNotification.service.ts`, the method `sendEmails` currently uses `Promise.all` for multiple recipients, and changing it to `Promise.allSettled` is considered for a future iteration.apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/subpoena.service.ts (1)
Learnt from: unakb PR: island-is/island.is#16393 File: apps/judicial-system/digital-mailbox-api/src/app/modules/cases/models/subpoena.response.ts:164-169 Timestamp: 2024-10-14T21:34:16.234Z Learning: Ensure that suggested code changes in `subpoena.response.ts` are accurate and necessary, avoiding redundant suggestions.
🔇 Additional comments (4)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/subpoena.service.ts (4)
17-25: LGTM: New imports added for notification functionalityThe new imports are correctly added and align with the changes made in the service. The use of
TUseras a type alias forUseris a good TypeScript practice.
62-62: LGTM: MessageService dependency added to constructorThe
MessageServiceis correctly injected as a dependency in the constructor, which is necessary for the new notification functionality.
234-234: LGTM: User type updated in deliverSubpoenaToPolice methodThe change from
UsertoTUserfor theuserparameter type is consistent with the new imports and improves type consistency across the codebase.
Line range hint
1-286: LGTM: Overall changes consistent with coding guidelinesThe modifications to the
SubpoenaServiceadhere to NextJS best practices and make good use of TypeScript for type safety. The new notification functionality is well-integrated into the existing service structure.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
libs/judicial-system/types/src/lib/notification.ts (1)
26-29: LGTM: New type alias enhances type safety for subpoena notifications.The introduction of
subpoenaNotificationTypeis a good practice, grouping related notification types and potentially improving type safety in the codebase. It aligns well with TypeScript best practices.For consistency with TypeScript naming conventions, consider capitalizing the first letter of the type alias:
export type SubpoenaNotificationType = | NotificationType.SERVICE_SUCCESSFUL | NotificationType.SERVICE_FAILED | NotificationType.DEFENDANT_SELECTED_DEFENDERThis change would align the type alias name with the common PascalCase convention for type names in TypeScript.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/dto/subpoenaNotification.dto.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/subpoenaNotification.service.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/judicial-system/types/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/judicial-system/types/src/lib/notification.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/dto/subpoenaNotification.dto.ts
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/subpoenaNotification.service.ts
- libs/judicial-system/types/src/index.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
libs/judicial-system/types/src/lib/notification.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
📓 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: oddsson PR: island-is/island.is#16329 File: apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/subpoenaNotification.service.ts:0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-15T10:31:27.440Z Learning: In `apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/subpoena.service.ts`, the method `findBySubpoenaId` throws an error if the subpoena is not found. Therefore, downstream code does not need to check if the result is undefined.Learnt from: oddsson PR: island-is/island.is#16329 File: apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/subpoenaNotification.service.ts:143-177 Timestamp: 2024-10-15T21:11:15.520Z Learning: In `apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/subpoenaNotification.service.ts`, the method `sendEmails` currently uses `Promise.all` for multiple recipients, and changing it to `Promise.allSettled` is considered for a future iteration.
🔇 Additional comments (2)
libs/judicial-system/types/src/lib/notification.ts (2)
21-23: LGTM: New notification types align with PR objectives.The addition of
SERVICE_SUCCESSFUL,SERVICE_FAILED, andDEFENDANT_SELECTED_DEFENDERto theNotificationTypeenum is consistent with the existing structure and naming conventions. These new types directly support the PR's objective of sending notifications for specific subpoena-related scenarios, enhancing communication for court users.
21-29: Adherence to coding guidelines forlibsdirectory confirmed.The changes in this file comply with the coding guidelines for the
libsdirectory:
- The
NotificationTypeenum andsubpoenaNotificationTypeare reusable across different NextJS apps.- TypeScript is correctly used for defining and exporting types.
- The simple nature of the enum and type alias should not interfere with effective tree-shaking and bundling practices.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/dto/subpoenaNotification.dto.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/subpoenaNotification.service.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/judicial-system/types/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/dto/subpoenaNotification.dto.ts
- libs/judicial-system/types/src/index.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/subpoenaNotification.service.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
📓 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: oddsson PR: island-is/island.is#16329 File: apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/subpoenaNotification.service.ts:0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-15T10:31:27.440Z Learning: In `apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/subpoena.service.ts`, the method `findBySubpoenaId` throws an error if the subpoena is not found. Therefore, downstream code does not need to check if the result is undefined.Learnt from: oddsson PR: island-is/island.is#16329 File: apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/subpoenaNotification.service.ts:143-177 Timestamp: 2024-10-15T21:11:15.520Z Learning: In `apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/subpoenaNotification.service.ts`, the method `sendEmails` currently uses `Promise.all` for multiple recipients, and changing it to `Promise.allSettled` is considered for a future iteration.apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/subpoenaNotification.service.ts (2)
Learnt from: oddsson PR: island-is/island.is#16329 File: apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/subpoenaNotification.service.ts:143-177 Timestamp: 2024-10-15T21:11:15.520Z Learning: In `apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/subpoenaNotification.service.ts`, the method `sendEmails` currently uses `Promise.all` for multiple recipients, and changing it to `Promise.allSettled` is considered for a future iteration.Learnt from: oddsson PR: island-is/island.is#16329 File: apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/subpoenaNotification.service.ts:0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-15T10:31:27.440Z Learning: In `apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/subpoena.service.ts`, the method `findBySubpoenaId` throws an error if the subpoena is not found. Therefore, downstream code does not need to check if the result is undefined.
🔇 Additional comments (4)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/subpoenaNotification.service.ts (4)
31-51: LGTM: Class definition and constructorThe
SubpoenaNotificationServiceclass is well-structured, extendingBaseNotificationServiceand using dependency injection appropriately. This design promotes code reuse and follows good practices for NestJS services.
53-76: LGTM: getEmailContents methodThe
getEmailContentsmethod is well-implemented, providing appropriate email content based on the notification type. The use of a switch statement and error handling for unrecognized types are good practices.
143-177: LGTM: sendEmails methodThe
sendEmailsmethod efficiently sends emails concurrently and handles cases where recipient information might be missing. The use ofPromise.allis appropriate for the current implementation.
179-195: LGTM: sendNotification methodThe
sendNotificationmethod is well-implemented, with proper error handling and a clear success/failure response. The asynchronous operation is correctly awaited, ensuring proper execution flow.
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/subpoenaNotification.service.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/subpoenaNotification.service.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…cations-defendant-selected-defender
…cations-defendant-selected-defender
oddsson
added
the
deprecated:automerge
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/test/createTestingSubpoenaModule.ts (2)
31-31: LGTM: MessageService correctly mocked.The
MessageServiceis properly mocked for testing purposes. This is consistent with how other services are mocked in this file.Consider grouping related mocks together. You could move this mock statement next to other judicial system related mocks for better organization.
13-13: Summary: MessageService integration enhances the testing module.The changes introduce the
MessageServiceto the testing module, including its import, mock, and addition to the providers array. These modifications are well-implemented and consistent with the existing code structure. They enhance the testing capabilities by making theMessageServiceavailable for dependency injection in tests.As the project grows, consider creating a separate file for mock declarations to improve maintainability and reduce clutter in the main test module file.
Also applies to: 31-31, 80-80
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/limitedAccessSubpoena.controller.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/test/createTestingSubpoenaModule.ts (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/limitedAccessSubpoena.controller.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/test/createTestingSubpoenaModule.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
📓 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: oddsson PR: island-is/island.is#16329 File: apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/notification/subpoenaNotification.service.ts:0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-15T10:31:27.440Z Learning: In `apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/subpoena.service.ts`, the method `findBySubpoenaId` throws an error if the subpoena is not found. Therefore, downstream code does not need to check if the result is undefined.
🔇 Additional comments (2)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/test/createTestingSubpoenaModule.ts (2)
13-13: LGTM: MessageService import added correctly.The import statement for
MessageServiceis properly placed and follows the correct syntax and naming conventions for TypeScript and the project structure.
80-80: LGTM: MessageService added to providers.The
MessageServiceis correctly added to the providers array, making it available for dependency injection in the test module. This is consistent with how other services are provided in this module.
oddsson
added
deprecated:automerge
kodiakhq
bot
deleted the
j-s/notifications-defendant-selected-defender
branch
Send notifications when subpoena changes
Asana
What
Send email notifications to judges and registrars when
Why
This is useful info for court users.
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
SubpoenaNotificationServicefor managing subpoena notifications.NotificationModuleto include theSubpoenaNotificationService.Bug Fixes
Documentation