feat(old-age-pension): Add e2e tests #16369
Conversation
* feat(oldAgePension): period screen * added unitest for oldAgePensionUtils * added validator and snemmtöku additional documents * chore: Gitbook update dirty files --------- Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* add validators * validator text message
* added fisherman and additional files screen * change id name * format * add to Review page
* feat(old-age-pension): added homeAllowence * feat(old-age-pension): move to Section
* fix(old-age-pension): fishermen period * fix(old-age-pension): fix attachments * fix(old-age-pension): corrected homeAllowance objects * fix(old-age-pension): fix homeAllowance screens
…sland.is into feat/old-age-pension
Co-authored-by: Þorkell Máni Þorkelsson <[email protected]>
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several mock files and updates related to the parental leave and social insurance functionalities within the application. New mock responses are created for the parental leave and social insurance administration services, while a new mock file for the National Registry is also added. The Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 12
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (13)
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/parentalLeave.mock.ts (3)
12-40: LGTM with suggestion: Consider parameterizing the kennitalaThe mock setup for fetching personal information from the National Registry is well-structured and comprehensive. However, to improve test flexibility, consider parameterizing the kennitala (currently hardcoded as '0101303019') to allow for different test scenarios.
You could modify the function to accept a parameter:
export const loadParentalLeaveXroadMocks = async (kennitala: string = '0101303019') => { // Use `kennitala` instead of hardcoded value in all mock setups // ... }This change would allow for more diverse test cases without altering the core mock structure.
53-111: LGTM with suggestion: Consider deterministic randomness for reproducibilityThe Labor service mocks are comprehensive, covering various scenarios including parental leave periods, parental leaves list (with both GET and POST methods), and pregnancy status. The use of a random factor for the expected date of birth adds variability to the tests, which is good.
However, for better test reproducibility, consider using a seeded random number generator. This would allow for controlled variability that can be reproduced when needed.
You could implement a seeded random number generator like this:
import seedrandom from 'seedrandom'; // At the beginning of the function const rng = seedrandom('your-seed-here'); // Replace Math.random() with rng() const babyBDayRandomFactor = Math.ceil(rng() * 85);This approach would maintain test variability while allowing for reproducibility when needed.
1-112: Overall: Well-structured and comprehensive mock setup with room for minor improvementsThis file provides a robust set of mocks for testing parental leave functionalities, covering both National Registry and Labor service endpoints. The consistent structure and comprehensive coverage of various scenarios make this an excellent foundation for e2e testing.
To further enhance this implementation, consider the following improvements:
- Parameterize the kennitala to allow for more flexible testing scenarios.
- Implement a seeded random number generator for the pregnancy status mock to balance variability with reproducibility.
These changes would make the tests more flexible and easier to debug while maintaining their thoroughness.
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension/src/forms/Prerequisites.ts (2)
64-64: LGTM! Consider using a constant for the data-test-id.The addition of
dataTestIdimproves the testability of the form. Good job!Consider defining these test IDs as constants in a separate file to ensure consistency across the codebase and ease future updates. For example:
// testIds.ts export const OLD_AGE_PENSION_TEST_ID = 'old-age-pension'; // Usage in this file import { OLD_AGE_PENSION_TEST_ID } from './testIds'; // ... dataTestId: OLD_AGE_PENSION_TEST_ID,
82-82: LGTM! Completes the set of test IDs for radio options.The addition of
dataTestIdfor the sailor pension option completes the set of test IDs for all radio options in this form field. This consistency will greatly improve the testability of the form.Now that all radio options have test IDs, consider updating your end-to-end tests to utilize these IDs for more robust and maintainable tests. This will make your tests less brittle to changes in the UI text or structure.
For example, in your e2e tests:
cy.get('[data-test-id="old-age-pension"]').click(); cy.get('[data-test-id="half-old-age-pension"]').should('be.visible'); cy.get('[data-test-id="sailor-pension"]').should('be.visible');libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension/src/forms/OldAgePensionForm.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-1010: Consider improving modularity and type safetyWhile the current implementation is functional, there are a few suggestions to enhance maintainability and type safety:
Modularity: The form definition is quite large. Consider splitting it into smaller, more manageable pieces. Each section could be defined in a separate file and then composed in this main file.
Reusability: Identify common patterns or field configurations that could be extracted into reusable functions or constants. This could help reduce duplication and make updates easier.
Type safety: Consider using TypeScript enums or const objects for the numerous string literals used as IDs and titles. This would provide better type checking and make refactoring easier.
Example of improving type safety:
enum FormFields { PaymentInfo = 'paymentInfo', PersonalAllowanceUsage = 'personalAllowanceUsage', // ... other fields } // Usage buildTextField({ id: `${FormFields.PaymentInfo}.${FormFields.PersonalAllowanceUsage}`, // ... other properties })These changes could significantly improve the maintainability and robustness of the form definition.
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/old-age-pension.spec.ts (5)
185-185: Translate TODO comment to EnglishThe TODO comment is not in English. For consistency, please translate comments to English to ensure all team members can understand and address them.
90-95: Use consistent heading locatorsThroughout the test, headings are located using
page.getByRole('heading', { name: ... }). Ensure that this pattern is consistently used for readability and maintainability.
20-20: Use realistic test data for phone numberThe phone number
'0103019'may not conform to typical phone number formats. Consider using a realistic test phone number to better simulate real-world scenarios.
151-161: Clarify selection for "One payment per year"The test selects "No" for the "One payment per year" option. Ensure this choice aligns with the test scenario expectations, and consider adding a comment to explain the selection if necessary.
194-194: Remove unnecessary commented-out codeThe code is commented out and may no longer be needed. Consider removing it to keep the codebase clean. If it's needed, resolve the issue and uncomment the code.
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/parental-leave.spec.ts (2)
275-276: Remove redundantselectText()beforefill()The
.fill()method overwrites the content of the input field, makingselectText()unnecessary. Simplify the code by removingselectText().Apply this diff:
- await phoneNumber.selectText() await phoneNumber.fill('6555555')
289-290: Eliminate unnecessaryselectText()beforefill()Since
.fill()replaces the entire input value,selectText()is redundant. Remove it to streamline the code.Apply this diff:
- await paymentBank.selectText() await paymentBank.fill('051226054678')
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/parentalLeave.mock.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/old-age-pension.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/parental-leave.spec.ts (10 hunks)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/setup-xroad.mocks.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension/src/forms/OldAgePensionForm.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension/src/forms/Prerequisites.ts (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (6)
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/parentalLeave.mock.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/old-age-pension.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/parental-leave.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/setup-xroad.mocks.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension/src/forms/OldAgePensionForm.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension/src/forms/Prerequisites.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🔇 Additional comments (11)
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/parentalLeave.mock.ts (2)
1-11: LGTM: Imports and function declaration are well-structuredThe imports are appropriate for the task, including necessary HTTP methods, response handling, and date manipulation functions. The main function
loadParentalLeaveXroadMocksis correctly exported and declared as async, which is suitable for setting up multiple mocks.
41-52: LGTM: Marital status mock is well-structuredThe mock setup for fetching marital status from the National Registry is consistent with the previous mock and provides an appropriate response structure. Remember to apply the suggested parameterization of the kennitala here as well if you implement that change.
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension/src/forms/Prerequisites.ts (1)
72-72: LGTM! Consistent with the previous change.The addition of
dataTestIdfor the half old-age pension option is consistent with the previous change and improves testability.As mentioned in the previous comment, consider using constants for these test IDs.
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension/src/forms/OldAgePensionForm.ts (1)
295-295: Approved: Added data-test-id for improved testabilityThe addition of
dataTestId: 'personal-allowance-usage'to thepaymentInfo.personalAllowanceUsagefield is a good practice. It enhances the testability of the component by providing a reliable selector for end-to-end or integration tests.apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/setup-xroad.mocks.ts (1)
12-12: Integration of parental leave Xroad mocks is correctThe addition of
await loadParentalLeaveXroadMocks()properly incorporates the parental leave mocks into the Xroad setup. This enhances modularity and keeps the setup organized.apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/old-age-pension.spec.ts (1)
185-186:⚠️ Potential issueHandle potential invalid month selection
The TODO comment suggests that the month may not be valid. Please implement a check to ensure that the selected month is valid, or adjust the test to handle cases where the month might not be valid.
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/parental-leave.spec.ts (5)
1-3: Appropriate inclusion of date-fns importsThe addition of
addDaysandaddMonthsimports fromdate-fnsis appropriate for date manipulation in tests.
21-27: Approved: Importing environment variables and URLsImporting
BaseAuthority,TestEnvironment,env,getEnvironmentBaseUrl, andurlssupports environment-specific configurations, enhancing test flexibility.
86-86: Approved: Usingtest.beforeAllfor setupSwitching to
test.beforeAlloptimizes the test suite by initializing the context once before all tests, improving efficiency.
90-90: Approved: Setting test phone numberSetting the test phone number to '0103019' is acceptable for testing purposes.
93-94: Verify shared email accounts do not cause test interferenceInitializing
applicantandemployeremail accounts intest.beforeAllshares them across all tests. Ensure that test cases do not interfere with each other by modifying the shared email accounts, which could lead to flaky tests.
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/setup-xroad.mocks.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/old-age-pension.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/old-age-pension.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/old-age-pension.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/old-age-pension.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/parental-leave.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/parental-leave.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/parental-leave.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/parental-leave.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/parental-leave.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #16369 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 36.74% 36.75%
=======================================
Files 6804 6804
Lines 140882 140902 +20
Branches 40124 40137 +13
=======================================
+ Hits 51765 51786 +21
+ Misses 89117 89116 -1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. see 6 files with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/setup-xroad.mocks.ts (1)
12-15: Approve centralized mock setup and suggest minor improvementThe refactoring to use
loadParentalLeaveXroadMocksandloadSocialInsuranceAdministrationXroadMocksis a significant improvement. It centralizes the mock setup process, enhancing code organization and maintainability.To further improve code clarity, consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of these mock setups:
/* Setup X-Road mocks for different services */ await loadParentalLeaveXroadMocks() await loadSocialInsuranceAdministrationXroadMocks()This change aligns with NextJS best practices by improving the structure and readability of the testing framework.
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/old-age-pension.spec.ts (4)
15-37: LGTM: Test configuration is well-structured, with a suggestion for improvementThe test configuration is well-organized and follows Playwright best practices. It properly sets up the application context, manages resources, and isolates the test environment.
Consider defining an interface for the
sessionfunction parameters to enhance type safety:interface SessionOptions { browser: Browser; homeUrl: string; phoneNumber: string; idsLoginOn: boolean; } const applicationContext = await session({ browser, homeUrl, phoneNumber: '0103019', idsLoginOn: true, } as SessionOptions)
46-66: LGTM: Application type selection and data provider agreement steps are well-implementedThe test steps for selecting the application type and agreeing to data providers are well-structured and follow a logical flow. The use of
expectassertions to verify the visibility of elements is appropriate.Consider adding assertions to verify the state of the selected options after clicking:
await page.getByTestId('old-age-pension').click() await expect(page.getByTestId('old-age-pension')).toBeChecked() await page.getByTestId('agree-to-data-providers').click() await expect(page.getByTestId('agree-to-data-providers')).toBeChecked()This ensures that the options are not only clicked but also properly selected.
68-108: LGTM: Pension fund questions and applicant info steps are well-implementedThe test steps for answering pension fund questions and filling in applicant information are well-structured and follow a logical flow. The use of
expectassertions to verify the visibility of elements is appropriate.Consider adding an assertion to verify the phone number input value after filling:
await phoneNumber.fill('6555555') await expect(phoneNumber).toHaveValue('6555555')This ensures that the phone number is not only entered but also properly set in the input field.
109-261: LGTM: Comprehensive test steps with suggestions for improvementThe test steps comprehensively cover the entire Old Age Pension application process, including payment information, payment frequency, residence history, period selection, attachments, comments, and submission. The consistent use of
expectassertions throughout the process is commendable.There's a TODO comment regarding file upload functionality:
// TODO: Need to look into this, it may happen that a month is not validWould you like assistance in investigating this issue or creating a GitHub issue to track it?
Consider adding an assertion after submitting the application to verify that the submission was successful:
await page .getByRole('button', { name: label( socialInsuranceAdministrationMessage.confirm.submitButton, ), }) .click() // Add this assertion await expect(page.getByText(/Application submitted successfully/)).toBeVisible({ timeout: 10000 })This ensures that the application submission process completes successfully.
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/socialInsuranceAdministration.mock.ts (1)
93-139: Ensure Mock Data Does Not Contain Real Personal InformationThe mock data includes personal identifiers like
kennitala, names, and addresses. While it's acceptable in a testing environment, please verify that this data does not correspond to real individuals to prevent any unintended exposure of personal information.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/parentalLeave.mock.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/socialInsuranceAdministration.mock.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/old-age-pension.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/setup-xroad.mocks.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/parentalLeave.mock.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/socialInsuranceAdministration.mock.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/old-age-pension.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/setup-xroad.mocks.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
🔇 Additional comments (4)
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/setup-xroad.mocks.ts (1)
3-7: Approve new imports and consider using module aliasesThe addition of new import statements for
loadParentalLeaveXroadMocksandloadSocialInsuranceAdministrationXroadMocksis a good step towards centralizing mock setup. This change improves the overall structure of the testing framework.To further improve code readability, consider implementing module aliases as suggested in a previous review. This would simplify the deeply nested relative import paths, making the code easier to maintain.
For example, you could use:
import { Base } from '@infra/dsl/xroad' import { env } from '@support/urls' import { resetMocks, wildcard } from '@support/wire-mocks' import { loadParentalLeaveXroadMocks } from '@mocks/parentalLeave.mock' import { loadSocialInsuranceAdministrationXroadMocks } from '@mocks/socialInsuranceAdministration.mock'This requires configuring path mappings in your
tsconfig.jsonfile.apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/old-age-pension.spec.ts (3)
1-14: LGTM: Imports and initial setup are well-structuredThe import statements and initial setup are well-organized and include all necessary modules for the end-to-end test. The
homeUrlconstant is correctly defined for the Old Age Pension application.
39-45: LGTM: Test description and initial setup are clear and conciseThe test suite description for "Old Age Pension" is well-defined. The use of the
helpersfunction to set up reusable test actions, such asproceed(), is a good practice for maintaining clean and DRY test code.
262-280: LGTM: Conclusion screen verification is well-implementedThe final test step appropriately checks for the visibility of the conclusion screen header, ensuring that the application process has completed successfully. The use of the
expectassertion to verify the presence of the header is correct and follows best practices.
...src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/socialInsuranceAdministration.mock.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/socialInsuranceAdministration.mock.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/socialInsuranceAdministration.mock.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/socialInsuranceAdministration.mock.ts (3)
6-37: LGTM: Currency mock setup is comprehensive.The mock for '/api/protected/v1/General/currencies' is well-configured and returns a substantial list of currency codes.
Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of this mock and whether the currency list is exhaustive or if it should be updated periodically.
53-63: LGTM: Old age pension eligibility mock is well-structured.The mock for '/api/protected/v1/Applicant/oldagepension/eligible' provides a clear structure for eligibility checks.
Consider adding variations of this mock (e.g., not eligible scenarios) to test different use cases. This could be achieved by parameterizing the mock setup or creating separate mock functions for different scenarios.
1-74: Overall, excellent mock setup with room for minor enhancements.The
socialInsuranceAdministration.mock.tsfile is well-structured and provides comprehensive mock setups for various Social Insurance Administration API endpoints. The mocks cover currencies, applicant details, eligibility checks, and application submissions, which should facilitate thorough e2e testing.To further improve the file:
- Consider adding JSDoc comments to the main function and each mock setup to explain their purposes and any assumptions made.
- Explore options to make the mock setups more flexible, such as parameterizing the responses or creating separate functions for different scenarios (e.g., eligible vs. non-eligible applicants).
- If these mocks are part of a larger testing strategy, consider adding a comment at the file level explaining how this file fits into the overall e2e testing approach.
These enhancements would improve maintainability and make the file even more valuable for future development and testing efforts.
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/nationalRegistry.mocks.ts (3)
5-85: Function structure is well-organized, but could benefit from minor readability improvements.The
loadNationalRegistryXroadMocksfunction is well-structured and makes good use of async/await. The mock data is comprehensive and realistic. However, consider adding comments or separating the different mock setups (e.g., personal info, marital status, citizenship) into smaller functions for improved readability.Consider refactoring the function to improve readability:
export const loadNationalRegistryXroadMocks = async () => { await setupPersonalInfoMock('0101303019', 'Gervimaður Afríka'); await setupMaritalStatusMock('0101303019'); await setupCitizenshipMock('0101303019'); await setupResidenceHistoryMock('0101303019'); // ... other mock setups } async function setupPersonalInfoMock(kennitala: string, name: string) { await addXroadMock({ // ... existing configuration }); } // Similar functions for other mock setups
87-149: Consistent structure for mock data, but consider centralizing data management.The mock data for the second individual is well-structured and consistent with the first. It provides a good variety of test scenarios. However, to improve maintainability and reduce duplication, consider centralizing the mock data in a separate file.
Consider creating a separate file for mock data:
// mockData.ts export const individualsMockData = { '0101303019': { personalInfo: { /* ... */ }, maritalStatus: { /* ... */ }, // ... other data }, '0101307789': { personalInfo: { /* ... */ }, maritalStatus: { /* ... */ }, // ... other data }, }; // In nationalRegistry.mocks.ts import { individualsMockData } from './mockData'; // Use the imported data in your mock setupsThis approach would make it easier to manage and update mock data across different test scenarios.
151-162: General data mock is good, but consider improving extensibility.The mock for marital status codes is well-structured and consistent with other mocks. However, to improve extensibility and cover more scenarios, consider setting up mocks for multiple marital status codes.
Enhance the marital status code mocks:
const maritalStatusCodes = [ { kodi: '1', lysing: 'Ógiftur' }, { kodi: '2', lysing: 'Giftur' }, // Add more status codes as needed ]; for (const status of maritalStatusCodes) { await addXroadMock({ config: NationalRegistry, prefix: 'XROAD_NATIONAL_REGISTRY_SERVICE_PATH', apiPath: `/api/v1/lyklar/hjuskaparkodar/1/${status.kodi}`, prefixType: 'only-base-path', response: new Response().withJSONBody(status), }); }This approach allows for easy addition of new marital status codes and ensures comprehensive test coverage.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/nationalRegistry.mocks.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/socialInsuranceAdministration.mock.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/setup-xroad.mocks.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/nationalRegistry.mocks.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/socialInsuranceAdministration.mock.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/setup-xroad.mocks.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
🔇 Additional comments (9)
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/setup-xroad.mocks.ts (3)
6-8: LGTM: New imports are well-structured and consistentThe new imports for mock loading functions are clear, descriptive, and align well with the changes in the
setupXroadMocksfunction. This structure follows good practices for organizing test files in NextJS projects.Regarding the previous suggestion about using module aliases:
The recommendation to use module aliases for cleaner import paths, especially for deeply nested imports (lines 1-5), is still valid and would improve code readability. Consider implementing path mappings in your
tsconfig.jsonas suggested in the previous review.
13-17: Great refactoring: Improved modularity and maintainabilityThe changes to the
setupXroadMocksfunction significantly improve the code structure:
- Enhanced modularity: Mock setups are now separated into individual functions, making the code more organized and easier to maintain.
- Improved readability: The main function is now more concise and easier to understand at a glance.
- Correct use of async/await: The new function calls properly use the async/await pattern.
These changes align well with NextJS best practices for structuring test setups and will make future modifications and additions to the mocks easier to manage.
Line range hint
1-31: Excellent adherence to NextJS best practices and improved test structureThe changes in this file demonstrate a strong commitment to NextJS best practices and improved test structure:
- Modular approach: Breaking down mock setups into separate functions enhances reusability and maintainability.
- TypeScript usage: The code leverages TypeScript for improved type safety and developer experience.
- Async/await patterns: Proper use of async/await ensures efficient handling of asynchronous operations.
- Clear file organization: The file structure follows NextJS conventions for e2e test setups.
These improvements contribute to a more robust and maintainable test suite, which is crucial for ensuring the reliability of the application system.
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/socialInsuranceAdministration.mock.ts (4)
1-3: LGTM: Import statements are appropriate and concise.The import statements are well-organized and relevant to the file's purpose. They include necessary components from external libraries and internal modules required for setting up the mock responses.
5-5: LGTM: Function structure is well-defined and extensible.The
loadSocialInsuranceAdministrationXroadMocksfunction is appropriately exported and async. Its structure allows for easy addition of more mock setups in the future.
38-52: LGTM: Applicant mock setup provides necessary details.The mock for '/api/protected/v1/Applicant' is well-structured and includes essential applicant information.
Is the null phone number intentional? If it's meant to represent a possible real-world scenario where the phone number is not provided, consider adding a comment to clarify this intention.
64-73: LGTM: Old age pension application mock is correctly configured.The mock for '/api/protected/v1/Application/oldagepension' is well-structured and correctly set up for POST requests. It appropriately simulates the application submission process by returning an application line ID.
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/nationalRegistry.mocks.ts (2)
1-3: Imports look good and follow best practices.The imports are appropriate for the file's purpose, using relative paths for project-specific imports and a named import for the external library. This follows NextJS best practices and makes good use of TypeScript.
1-162: Overall, well-structured mock setup with room for minor improvements.This file successfully sets up comprehensive mock data for the National Registry service, adhering to NextJS best practices and making good use of TypeScript. The mock scenarios cover a wide range of data types and situations, which will be valuable for thorough e2e testing.
To further improve the file:
- Consider breaking down the large
loadNationalRegistryXroadMocksfunction into smaller, more focused functions.- Centralize mock data in a separate file for easier management and updates.
- Enhance the extensibility of general data mocks, such as marital status codes.
These improvements will enhance maintainability and scalability as the test suite grows.
...
Attach a link to issue if relevant
What
Specify what you're trying to achieve
Why
Specify why you need to achieve this
Screenshots / Gifs
Attach Screenshots / Gifs to help reviewers understand the scope of the pull request
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes