fix(web): Fallback to empty array in richText call

[RunarVestmann]

Fallback to empty array in richText call

Checklist:

• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• My changes generate no new warnings
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• Formatting passes locally with my changes
• I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes

  • Improved error handling in the rich text rendering function to prevent runtime errors from null or undefined values.

• New Features

  • Enhanced the robustness of the webRichText function by ensuring it always receives a valid array for the slices parameter.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request focus on the webRichText function within the apps/web/utils/richText.tsx file. The primary modification involves the handling of the slices parameter, which now includes a check for null or undefined values, defaulting to an empty array if necessary. This adjustment aims to enhance the function's robustness by ensuring it always receives a valid array. The webRenderConnectedComponent function remains unchanged, preserving its existing logic and control flow.

Changes

File	Change Summary
apps/web/utils/richText.tsx	Modified webRichText function to check for null/undefined slices, defaulting to an empty array. Function signature updated to include default value for slices.

Possibly related PRs

• fix(web): Load image with 800px width when embedded in rich text #16355: This PR modifies the richText.tsx file, specifically enhancing the rendering capabilities for images, which is closely related to the changes made in the webRichText function in the main PR that also resides in the same file.

Suggested labels

automerge

Suggested reviewers

• mannipje

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4f5bc17 and d4ba025.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• apps/web/utils/richText.tsx (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

📓 Path-based instructions (1)

apps/web/utils/richText.tsx (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

• NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
• Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
• Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."

🔇 Additional comments (1)

apps/web/utils/richText.tsx (1)

301-301: LGTM! Null check implementation is correct.

The null coalescing operator provides a clean fallback to empty array, preventing potential runtime errors.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 36.80%. Comparing base (61582f9) to head (838eb57).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
apps/web/utils/richText.tsx	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #16564   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   36.80%   36.80%           
=======================================
  Files        6854     6854           
  Lines      142227   142201   -26     
  Branches    40558    40545   -13     
=======================================
- Hits        52342    52333    -9     
+ Misses      89885    89868   -17     

Flag	Coverage Δ
web	1.80% <0.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
apps/web/utils/richText.tsx	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

... and 7 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 61582f9...838eb57. Read the comment docs.

[datadog-island-is]

Datadog Report

Branch report: fix/web-prevent-500-errors-in-case-of-undefined-array-for-rich-text
Commit report: 01942cc
Test service: web

✅ 0 Failed, 84 Passed, 0 Skipped, 29.84s Total Time
➡️ Test Sessions change in coverage: 1 no change