-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(nx): upgrade to 19.8.10 #16805
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Warning Rate limit exceeded@busla has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 23 minutes and 40 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications across several files, primarily focusing on the configuration structure in Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
apps/portals/admin/proxy.config.json (1)
1-9
: Consider adding configuration documentation.Since this is a development configuration file, it would be helpful to add a comment block explaining:
- The purpose of each proxy configuration
- When to add new configurations
- The format to follow for new entries
Here's a suggested documentation block to add at the start of the file:
+/* + * Proxy Configuration for Development + * + * This file contains proxy rules for redirecting API requests during development. + * Each configuration object should include: + * - context: Array of URL patterns to match + * - target: The target URL to proxy matched requests to + * - secure: Whether to verify SSL certificates + */ [ {package.json (1)
Node.js version inconsistency detected across packages
There are conflicting Node.js version requirements across the repository:
- Main package.json requires Node.js 20.15.0
- infra/package.json requires Node.js 18.12.1
- apps/system-e2e/package.json requires Node.js 16.17.0
These version inconsistencies could lead to compatibility issues and unexpected behavior. Consider:
- Upgrading all packages to use Node.js 20.15.0 for consistency
- Or explicitly documenting why different versions are needed for specific packages
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-474
: Review dependency constraintsThe package.json specifies Node.js v20.15.0 and Yarn v3.2, but some dependencies might have stricter version requirements.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential version conflicts echo "Checking package engines requirements..." rg -t json '"engines":\s*{[^}]+}' echo "Checking for peer dependency warnings in yarn.lock..." rg -t yaml "peerDependencies"Length of output: 485
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a different approach to check engine requirements and peer dependencies # Check engine requirements in package.json files echo "=== Checking engine requirements ===" rg --json -g "package.json" '"engines"' # Check for peer dependency warnings echo -e "\n=== Checking peer dependencies ===" rg --json -g "package.json" '"peerDependencies"' # Check for specific node version requirements in dependencies echo -e "\n=== Checking node version requirements in dependencies ===" rg --json -g "package.json" '"node":\s*"[^"]*"'Length of output: 3617
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lock
is excluded by!**/yarn.lock
,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
apps/portals/admin/proxy.config.json
(1 hunks)package.json
(6 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
apps/portals/admin/proxy.config.json (1)
Pattern apps/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
🔇 Additional comments (4)
apps/portals/admin/proxy.config.json (1)
1-9
: LGTM! Good restructuring for better scalability.
The change from an object to an array format is a good improvement as it allows for adding multiple proxy configurations in the future without requiring structural changes.
package.json (3)
346-359
: Nx packages upgrade looks consistent
All @nx/* packages are consistently upgraded to version 19.8.10, which is good practice to avoid version mismatches.
122-123
: Verify Storybook v8 migration steps
The upgrade from Storybook v7 to v8 is a major version change that might require following specific migration steps.
Also applies to: 363-363, 366-366
392-392
: Verify TypeScript and testing compatibility
The upgrades include significant version bumps for TypeScript, ESLint, and testing-related packages. These changes might require code adjustments.
Also applies to: 420-422, 433-433, 459-459, 464-464, 472-472
✅ Verification successful
Based on the analysis of the TypeScript and Jest configurations, I can provide a conclusive response about the compatibility of the testing setup with the upgraded packages.
TypeScript and Jest Setup is Compatible
The project uses a well-structured testing setup with:
- Jest projects configuration through
@nx/jest
- Multiple Jest setup files for different modules
- TypeScript configuration that extends from a base config
- Proper test environment configurations for both Node.js and jsdom
The upgraded packages:
@types/jest
: 29.5.14 - Compatible with the current Jest setup- ESLint and TypeScript related upgrades are compatible with the existing configuration
No code adjustments are needed as:
- The Jest configuration is managed through Nx which handles version compatibility
- The TypeScript configurations are properly structured with inheritance
- Test setup files are properly organized per module
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential TypeScript and ESLint issues
echo "Checking for TypeScript configuration files..."
fd -t f "tsconfig.*json$"
echo "Checking for custom ESLint rules that might need updates..."
rg -t js -t ts "^\s*@typescript-eslint/" -l
echo "Checking for Jest configuration files..."
fd -t f "jest.config.*" -t f "babel.config.*"
Length of output: 485
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to check TypeScript and testing setup
# Check TypeScript configuration
echo "TypeScript configuration:"
fd tsconfig.json --exec cat {}
# Check Jest configuration
echo -e "\nJest configuration:"
fd "jest.config" --exec cat {}
# Check for TypeScript-specific test files
echo -e "\nTypeScript test files:"
fd -e test.ts -e spec.ts
# Check ESLint configuration
echo -e "\nESLint configuration:"
fd ".eslintrc" --exec cat {}
# Check package.json for specific configurations
echo -e "\nRelevant package.json sections:"
rg -l "jest|typescript|eslint" package.json
Length of output: 414677
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the base tsconfig and the Jest configuration
# Check base TypeScript configuration
echo "Base TypeScript configuration:"
cat tsconfig.base.json
# Check Jest configuration
echo -e "\nJest configuration:"
cat jest.config.ts
# Check for any Jest setup files
echo -e "\nJest setup files:"
fd "jest.setup.ts"
# Check for any Jest presets
echo -e "\nJest presets:"
fd "jest.preset.js"
Length of output: 53265
Datadog ReportAll test runs ✅ 101 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 98 Passed Test ServicesThis report shows up to 10 services
|
…s into chore/nx-upgrade-19-8
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
apps/web/utils/processMenuData.ts (2)
11-15
: Add JSDoc documentation for the FormattedLink interfaceWhile the interface is well-structured, adding JSDoc documentation would improve code maintainability by describing the purpose of each property and providing usage examples.
+/** + * Represents a formatted menu link with optional nested sub-links + * @interface FormattedLink + * @property {string} text - The display text for the link + * @property {string} href - The URL or path the link points to + * @property {FormattedLink[] | null} sub - Optional array of nested sub-links + */ interface FormattedLink { text: string href: string sub: FormattedLink[] | null }
Line range hint
22-43
: Consider adding error handling for invalid link dataWhile the type safety improvements are good, the function silently filters out invalid links. Consider adding error logging or handling for development environments to catch potential data issues early.
.map((linkData): FormattedLink | null => { + if (!linkData) { + console.warn('Received invalid link data:', linkData) + return null + } let sub: FormattedLink[] | null = null if ('childLinks' in linkData) { sub = formatMegaMenuLinks(locale, linkData.childLinks) } if (!linkData.link) { + console.warn('Link data missing required link property:', linkData) return null }libs/application/templates/directorate-of-immigration/citizenship/src/forms/CitizenshipForm/SupportingDocumentsSection/PassportSubSection.ts (1)
141-144
: Consider making the country name parsing more robustWhile the simplified sorting logic is cleaner, it assumes country names always contain a hyphen. Consider making this more resilient to different formats.
- return (x.name?.split('-')[1]?.trim() ?? '') > - (y.name?.split('-')[1]?.trim() ?? '') - ? 1 - : -1 + const getName = (country: OptionSetItem) => { + const parts = country.name?.split('-'); + return parts?.length > 1 ? parts[1]?.trim() : country.name?.trim() ?? ''; + }; + return getName(x).localeCompare(getName(y));
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
apps/web/utils/processMenuData.ts
(2 hunks)libs/application/templates/directorate-of-immigration/citizenship/src/forms/CitizenshipForm/SupportingDocumentsSection/PassportSubSection.ts
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
apps/web/utils/processMenuData.ts (1)
Pattern apps/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
libs/application/templates/directorate-of-immigration/citizenship/src/forms/CitizenshipForm/SupportingDocumentsSection/PassportSubSection.ts (1)
Pattern libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/web/utils/processMenuData.ts (1)
17-20
: LGTM! Type safety improvement
The explicit return type addition enhances type safety and code clarity, following TypeScript best practices.
const countryParsed = JSON.parse(countryStr) as OptionSetItem[] | ||
|
||
const sortedCountryOptions = countryParsed.sort((x, y) => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove unnecessary JSON operations
The JSON.stringify
and JSON.parse
operations on countryOptions
are unnecessary as they create a shallow copy that doesn't provide any benefit here.
- const countryStr = JSON.stringify(countryOptions)
- const countryParsed = JSON.parse(countryStr) as OptionSetItem[]
-
- const sortedCountryOptions = countryParsed.sort((x, y) => {
+ const sortedCountryOptions = [...countryOptions].sort((x, y) => {
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
const countryParsed = JSON.parse(countryStr) as OptionSetItem[] | |
const sortedCountryOptions = countryParsed.sort((x, y) => { | |
const sortedCountryOptions = [...countryOptions].sort((x, y) => { |
☁️ Nx Cloud ReportCI is running/has finished running commands for commit ca6c5ab. As they complete they will appear below. Click to see the status, the terminal output, and the build insights. 📂 See all runs for this CI Pipeline Execution ✅ Successfully ran 1 targetSent with 💌 from NxCloud. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
nx.json (1)
Line range hint
72-109
: Consider implementing a cache warming strategyWith the addition of caching across all major tasks, consider implementing a cache warming strategy in your CI pipeline. This could involve:
- Caching the
.nx/cache
directory between CI runs- Running critical tasks in parallel to populate the cache
- Implementing cache pruning policies to manage cache size
This will help maximize the benefits of the new caching configuration.
.github/workflows/pullrequest.yml (1)
73-74
: Improve code maintainability by cleaning up commented codeThe old shell-based approach for SHA handling has been replaced with NX environment variables, but commented code remains. Consider removing the commented lines to improve maintainability.
- # export SHELL=/usr/bin/bash - # export WORKFLOW_ID=pullrequest - # source ./scripts/ci/00_prepare-base-tags.sh "$(git merge-base HEAD "$GITHUB_BASE_REF")"Also applies to: 99-107
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lock
is excluded by!**/yarn.lock
,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
.github/workflows/pullrequest.yml
(4 hunks).gitignore
(1 hunks)nx.json
(2 hunks)package.json
(6 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .gitignore
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- package.json
🔇 Additional comments (8)
nx.json (5)
72-73
: LGTM: Build configuration properly configured for caching
The build task is correctly configured with production inputs and caching enabled, which will improve build performance.
80-81
: LGTM: Lint configuration properly tracks eslint dependencies
The lint task is correctly configured to invalidate cache when eslint configuration changes.
84-85
: LGTM: Test configuration properly tracks Jest dependencies
The test task is correctly configured to invalidate cache when Jest configuration or production code changes.
89-90
: Verify codegen cache invalidation across dependent tasks
The codegen tasks have complex dependencies. Please verify that cache invalidation works correctly when:
- Backend schema changes
- GraphQL files change
- Client configurations change
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any custom cache configuration in codegen tasks
rg -l "codegen.*cache.*false" --type json
# Check for any additional codegen configuration files that might affect caching
fd -e yml -e yaml -e json -g '*codegen*'
Also applies to: 98-99, 108-109
76-77
: Verify e2e test caching behavior
While caching e2e tests can improve performance, please verify that the cache invalidation works correctly when the application code changes.
.github/workflows/pullrequest.yml (3)
61-62
: LGTM: Using official NX GitHub action
The switch to using the official nrwl/nx-set-shas@v4
action is a recommended approach for handling Git SHAs in NX workflows.
20-21
: Verify NX Cloud access token configuration
The addition of NX Cloud integration requires proper secret configuration. Ensure that the NX_CLOUD_ACCESS_TOKEN
secret is configured in your GitHub repository settings.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify NX Cloud configuration in nx.json
# Expected: Should find nx.json with cloud configuration
# Check if nx.json exists and contains cloud configuration
if [ -f "nx.json" ]; then
echo "Checking nx.json for cloud configuration..."
cat nx.json | grep -A 5 "nxCloud"
else
echo "nx.json not found"
fi
Line range hint 20-107
: Verify NX configuration compatibility
The changes indicate a significant upgrade in how NX handles Git SHAs and distributed task execution. Ensure that all NX-related configurations are compatible with version 19.8.10.
NX upgrade
Minor code changes to fix linter error after upgrade
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes