Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(work-accident-notification): alert message #16925

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Nov 18, 2024
Merged

Conversation

sigruntg
Copy link
Member

@sigruntg sigruntg commented Nov 18, 2024

Alert message

Attach a link to issue if relevant

What

Specify what you're trying to achieve

Why

Specify why you need to achieve this

Screenshots / Gifs

image

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new alert message field for employee start times.
    • Added required fields for start of workday date and start time with dynamic constraints.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Simplified existing message definitions for clarity.
  • Documentation

    • Enhanced localization capabilities with new message definitions related to employee start times.

@sigruntg sigruntg added the deprecated:automerge (Disabled) Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass label Nov 18, 2024
@sigruntg sigruntg requested a review from a team as a code owner November 18, 2024 15:26
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 18, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve modifications to the employee.ts file within the work accident notification form. New fields have been added to capture employee start time and workday date, along with an alert message. Additionally, updates to existing message definitions have been made to simplify their content and enhance localization. The overall structure of the form remains unchanged, maintaining the existing control flow while improving the functionality related to employee start times.

Changes

File Change Summary
libs/application/templates/aosh/work-accident-notification/src/forms/WorkAccidentNotificationForm/EmployeeSection/employee.ts - Added employee.startTimeAlert alert message field.
- Introduced required date field employee[${index}].startOfWorkdayDate with dynamic constraints.
- Added required text field employee[${index}].startTime for capturing start time.
libs/application/templates/aosh/work-accident-notification/src/lib/messages/employee.ts - Updated defaultMessage for startOfWorkdayDate from "Dagsetning byrjun starfsdags" to "Dagsetning".
- Updated defaultMessage for time from "Tími byrjun starfsdags" to "Tími".
- Added new message startTimeAlert with ID 'aosh.wan.application:employee.startTimeAlert' and default message "Dagsetning og tími þegar starfsmaður mætti til vinnu á slysadegi".

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • jonnigs
  • HjorturJ

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 18, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 36.46%. Comparing base (6e102a0) to head (019954e).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #16925   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   36.46%   36.46%           
=======================================
  Files        6903     6903           
  Lines      144583   144583           
  Branches    41283    41283           
=======================================
  Hits        52718    52718           
  Misses      91865    91865           
Flag Coverage Δ
api 3.34% <ø> (ø)
application-system-api 41.02% <ø> (ø)
application-template-api-modules 27.71% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
application-ui-shell 20.83% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-backend 55.53% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-web 27.16% <ø> (ø)
web 1.77% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 6e102a0...019954e. Read the comment docs.

---- 🚨 Try these New Features:

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d33043f and 80d01e4.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • libs/application/templates/aosh/work-accident-notification/src/forms/WorkAccidentNotificationForm/EmployeeSection/employee.ts (1 hunks)
  • libs/application/templates/aosh/work-accident-notification/src/lib/messages/employee.ts (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
libs/application/templates/aosh/work-accident-notification/src/forms/WorkAccidentNotificationForm/EmployeeSection/employee.ts (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/aosh/work-accident-notification/src/lib/messages/employee.ts (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🔇 Additional comments (3)
libs/application/templates/aosh/work-accident-notification/src/lib/messages/employee.ts (1)

83-89: Verify the UX impact of simplified field labels

The simplification of field labels ("Dagsetning" and "Tími") removes explicit context about these being workday start fields. While this makes the UI cleaner, ensure that users can still clearly understand these fields' purpose when combined with the new alert message.

Consider implementing this as a reusable pattern across the application where:

  1. Field labels remain concise
  2. Context is provided through helper text or alerts
libs/application/templates/aosh/work-accident-notification/src/forms/WorkAccidentNotificationForm/EmployeeSection/employee.ts (2)

169-175: Well-structured alert message implementation!

The alert message field is properly implemented using the builder pattern and follows good practices for localization and reusability.


Line range hint 176-189: Consider enhancing time validation and time zone handling.

While the implementation is solid, consider these improvements:

  1. The time field format ##:## only validates the pattern but might allow invalid times (e.g., "99:99"). Consider adding explicit time validation.
  2. For accurate incident reporting, it might be important to handle time zones explicitly, especially if the data is used across different regions.

Let's verify if there's any time validation logic elsewhere in the codebase:

@datadog-island-is
Copy link

datadog-island-is bot commented Nov 18, 2024

Datadog Report

All test runs 3c99d6a 🔗

7 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 7 Passed
➡️ Test Sessions change in coverage: 10 no change

Test Services
Service Name Failed Known Flaky New Flaky Passed Skipped Total Time Code Coverage Change Test Service View
api 0 0 0 4 0 3.03s 1 no change Link
application-system-api 0 0 0 112 2 3m 41.42s 1 no change Link
application-template-api-modules 0 0 0 116 0 2m 35.87s 1 no change Link
application-ui-shell 0 0 0 74 0 36.97s 1 no change Link
judicial-system-backend 0 0 0 21088 0 23m 44.98s 1 no change Link
judicial-system-web 0 0 0 333 0 1m 6.2s 1 no change Link
web 0 0 0 84 0 34.79s 1 no change Link

@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit a2b25ec into main Nov 18, 2024
45 checks passed
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the fix/work-accident-alert branch November 18, 2024 17:20
jonnigs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2024
* moving part of companyinfo to basicinfo to stop autofill

* some fixes

* extract strings

* fix inputs being empty on back button click

* adding alert

---------

Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
deprecated:automerge (Disabled) Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants