chore(j-s): Remove feature flag for combo indictments #17231
Conversation
…-indictment-subtype
…island.is into j-s/select-indictment-subtype
…-indictment-subtype
…-indictment-subtype
…-indictment-subtype
…island.is into j-s/select-indictment-subtype
oddsson
dismissed stale reviews from thorhildurt, busla, and coderabbitai[bot]
via
3dc3098
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/file/file.service.ts (1)
160-166: Improve readability of early return condition.The condition could be more readable by extracting the category check into a constant.
+ const isConfirmableCategory = + file.category === CaseFileCategory.RULING || + file.category === CaseFileCategory.COURT_RECORD + if ( !theCase.rulingDate || - (file.category !== CaseFileCategory.RULING && - file.category !== CaseFileCategory.COURT_RECORD) + !isConfirmableCategory ) { return undefined }libs/judicial-system/types/src/lib/case.ts (1)
Line range hint
379-392: LGTM! Consider using Array.prototype.flat() instead of lodash's flatten.The simplified logic looks good. However, since we're targeting modern JavaScript environments, consider using the native
Array.prototype.flat()method instead of lodash'sflattenutility for better bundle size and performance.-import flatten from 'lodash/flatten' - export const isTrafficViolationCase = (theCase: { type?: CaseType | null indictmentSubtypes?: IndictmentSubtypeMap caseFiles?: { category?: CaseFileCategory | null }[] | null }): boolean => { if (theCase.type !== CaseType.INDICTMENT || !theCase.indictmentSubtypes) { return false } - const flatIndictmentSubtypes = flatten( + const flatIndictmentSubtypes = Object.values(theCase.indictmentSubtypes).flat() - Object.values(theCase.indictmentSubtypes), - ) return ( flatIndictmentSubtypes.length > 0 && flatIndictmentSubtypes.every( (val) => val === IndictmentSubtype.TRAFFIC_VIOLATION, ) ) }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/formatters/confirmedPdf.ts(0 hunks)apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/case.service.ts(2 hunks)apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/limitedAccessCase.service.ts(0 hunks)apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/file/file.service.ts(2 hunks)apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/file/guards/caseFileCategory.ts(0 hunks)apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/file/guards/test/limitedAccessViewCaseFileGuard.spec.ts(0 hunks)apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/file/test/fileController/uploadCaseFileToCourt.spec.ts(0 hunks)apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/file/test/internalFileController/deliverCaseFileToCourt.spec.ts(0 hunks)apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/IndictmentCaseFilesList/IndictmentCaseFilesList.tsx(2 hunks)libs/judicial-system/types/src/lib/case.ts(1 hunks)libs/judicial-system/types/src/lib/file.ts(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (7)
- libs/judicial-system/types/src/lib/file.ts
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/file/guards/caseFileCategory.ts
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/file/test/internalFileController/deliverCaseFileToCourt.spec.ts
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/file/guards/test/limitedAccessViewCaseFileGuard.spec.ts
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/file/test/fileController/uploadCaseFileToCourt.spec.ts
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/limitedAccessCase.service.ts
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/formatters/confirmedPdf.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (4)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/IndictmentCaseFilesList/IndictmentCaseFilesList.tsx (1)
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/case.service.ts (1)
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
libs/judicial-system/types/src/lib/case.ts (1)
Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/file/file.service.ts (1)
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
🔇 Additional comments (4)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/IndictmentCaseFilesList/IndictmentCaseFilesList.tsx (2)
Line range hint
176-184: LGTM! Clean implementation of the indictment section.The changes successfully remove the feature flag complexity while maintaining proper TypeScript types and NextJS component patterns.
Also applies to: 186-189
185-185: LGTM! Appropriate generalization of the indictment title.The title change correctly reflects the removal of traffic violation specific logic.
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/file/file.service.ts (1)
176-185: Enhance type safety for confirmation parameters.While the code safely handles undefined values, consider adding runtime validation to ensure required fields are present.
Consider adding runtime validation:
+ const actor = theCase.judge?.name + if (!actor) { + throw new Error('Judge name is required for PDF confirmation') + } + return createConfirmedPdf( { - actor: theCase.judge?.name ?? '', + actor, title: theCase.judge?.title, institution: theCase.judge?.institution?.name ?? '', date: theCase.rulingDate, },apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/case.service.ts (1)
Line range hint
818-850: LGTM! Clean and simplified message handling.The changes effectively streamline the message handling by:
- Using a static list of case file categories
- Simplifying the message pushing logic
- Maintaining consistent behavior across all indictment types
This aligns well with the PR objective of removing feature-specific conditionals.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Shared/Cases/ActiveCases.tsx (1)
Line range hint
29-119: Consider performance optimizations.While the component follows NextJS best practices, consider these optimizations:
- Memoize the table configuration to prevent unnecessary re-renders
- Wrap the component with React.memo since it's likely to receive the same props frequently
Example implementation:
import { FC, useMemo, memo } from 'react' const ActiveCases: FC<Props> = memo((props) => { const { cases, onContextMenuDeleteClick, canDeleteCase } = props const { formatMessage } = useIntl() const { openCaseInNewTabMenuItem } = useContextMenu() const tableConfig = useMemo(() => ({ thead: [ // ... existing thead configuration ], columns: [ // ... existing columns configuration ] }), [formatMessage]) // Only depends on formatMessage return ( <Table {...tableConfig} data={cases} generateContextMenuItems={/* ... */} /> ) }) export default ActiveCasesapps/judicial-system/web/src/utils/hooks/useSections/index.ts (1)
500-524: Good architectural improvement.The removal of feature-specific conditionals and consistent inclusion of the traffic violation section improves the codebase by:
- Reducing complexity by eliminating conditional checks
- Maintaining a consistent navigation structure
- Following the principle of having a single, unified flow
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
apps/judicial-system/backend/migrations/20241211095654-update-defendant.js(1 hunks)apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/test/caseController/createCourtCase.spec.ts(1 hunks)apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/file/limitedAccessFile.controller.ts(1 hunks)apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/test/internalSubpoenaController/deliverSubpoenaToPolice.spec.ts(1 hunks)apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Defendant/PoliceCaseInfo/PoliceCaseInfo.tsx(0 hunks)apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Shared/Cases/ActiveCases.tsx(1 hunks)apps/judicial-system/web/src/utils/hooks/useSections/index.ts(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Defendant/PoliceCaseInfo/PoliceCaseInfo.tsx
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/test/caseController/createCourtCase.spec.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (5)
apps/judicial-system/backend/migrations/20241211095654-update-defendant.js (1)
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Shared/Cases/ActiveCases.tsx (1)
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/test/internalSubpoenaController/deliverSubpoenaToPolice.spec.ts (1)
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/web/src/utils/hooks/useSections/index.ts (1)
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/file/limitedAccessFile.controller.ts (1)
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
📓 Learnings (2)
apps/judicial-system/backend/migrations/20241211095654-update-defendant.js (2)
Learnt from: oddsson
PR: island-is/island.is#16495
File: apps/judicial-system/backend/migrations/20241022142128-update-defendant.js:1-2
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T15:15:20.157Z
Learning: In the 'judicial-system' application, it is a convention to include `'use strict'` directives at the top of migration files in `apps/judicial-system/backend/migrations/*.js`.
Learnt from: oddsson
PR: island-is/island.is#16495
File: apps/judicial-system/backend/migrations/20241022142128-update-defendant.js:18-24
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T15:15:20.157Z
Learning: When rolling back migrations, if the associated code that uses the fields is also rolled back, data preservation concerns may not be an issue.
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Shared/Cases/ActiveCases.tsx (2)
Learnt from: oddsson
PR: island-is/island.is#16939
File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/Table/PastCasesTable/PastCasesTable.tsx:126-131
Timestamp: 2024-11-19T21:47:09.093Z
Learning: The `CaseListEntry` interface in `@island.is/judicial-system-web/src/graphql/schema` includes the properties `isValidToDateInThePast`, `indictmentRulingDecision`, and `indictmentDecision`.
Learnt from: oddsson
PR: island-is/island.is#16939
File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/Table/PastCasesTable/PastCasesTable.tsx:136-139
Timestamp: 2024-11-20T10:15:04.980Z
Learning: The properties `isValidToDateInThePast`, `indictmentRulingDecision`, and `indictmentDecision` are defined in the `CaseListEntry` interface used in the `PastCasesTable` component.
🔇 Additional comments (10)
apps/judicial-system/backend/migrations/20241211095654-update-defendant.js (2)
Line range hint
1-27: LGTM! The migration is well-structured and follows best practices.The implementation correctly:
- Uses transactions for data integrity
- Provides proper rollback functionality
- Follows nullable column best practices
19-19: Good optimization removing the unused Sequelize parameter.The removal of the unused
Sequelizeparameter from thedownmethod signature improves code cleanliness.apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Shared/Cases/ActiveCases.tsx (2)
20-20: LGTM! Clean import optimization.The removal of unused
Defendantimport while retainingCaseListEntryimproves code cleanliness without affecting functionality, asCaseListEntrycontains all required properties.
Line range hint
22-27: Well-structured TypeScript implementation.The component demonstrates excellent TypeScript practices with:
- Clear props interface definition
- Type-safe event handlers
- Proper handling of nullable values
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/file/limitedAccessFile.controller.ts (3)
40-40: LGTM: Import cleanup aligns with PR objectives.The removal of unused civil claimant imports while retaining the guard import maintains code cleanliness.
Line range hint
111-146: Consider removing or implementing the unused civil claimant endpoint.This endpoint is currently unused and contains a TODO comment suggesting architectural changes. Given that this PR removes indictment-related feature flags, we should either:
- Implement the suggested changes and activate the endpoint
- Remove the endpoint entirely to maintain code cleanliness
Let's check if this endpoint is referenced anywhere:
Line range hint
1-190: Verify impact of indictment feature flag removal.The controller still includes indictment cases in several guards (e.g.,
CaseTypeGuard). Given that this PR removes the indictment feature flag, we should verify if these guards need updating.Let's check the usage of indictment cases in guards:
apps/judicial-system/web/src/utils/hooks/useSections/index.ts (1)
500-524: Verify navigation flow after feature flag removal.The traffic violation section is now always included in the navigation, which aligns with removing the feature flag. However, we should ensure that:
- All required validation steps are included in the form stepper.
- The navigation flow remains consistent with other sections.
Run the following script to verify the navigation flow consistency:
✅ Verification successful
Navigation flow is consistent after feature flag removal
The traffic violation section follows the standard navigation pattern with proper validation steps and correct routing sequence:
- Previous step: Processing
- Next step: Case Files
- Required validations: Defendant → Police Case Files → Case File → Processing
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent validation steps across navigation sections # Search for validateFormStepper calls to compare validation steps ast-grep --pattern 'validateFormStepper( $isValid, [ $steps ], $workingCase, )'Length of output: 93
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for validateFormStepper usage with a simpler pattern echo "=== Searching for validateFormStepper usage ===" ast-grep --pattern 'validateFormStepper($_)' echo -e "\n=== Searching for route constants ===" rg "INDICTMENTS.*ROUTE" -A 1 -B 1 echo -e "\n=== Searching for similar navigation patterns ===" rg "onNavigationTo\(" -A 2 -B 2Length of output: 64746
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/test/internalSubpoenaController/deliverSubpoenaToPolice.spec.ts (2)
67-67: LGTM! The test setup looks good.The change to directly await
givenWhenThen()without storing the result is a good simplification since the return value wasn't being used.
Line range hint
71-76: Tests need to be completed for the indictment generation functionality.The TODO comment indicates that tests are incomplete, specifically for the indictment generation functionality. Since this PR removes the feature flag for combo indictments and makes indictment generation automatic, we need comprehensive test coverage for this critical functionality.
Would you like me to help:
- Generate additional test cases to verify the automatic indictment generation?
- Create a GitHub issue to track this testing requirement?
Let me verify the current test coverage:
…subtype-remove-ff
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/utils/formHelper.ts (1)
Remove
isTrafficViolationIndictmentCountfunction and its usagesThe function is exclusively used for traffic violation logic in
IndictmentCount.tsx, always in conjunction withIndictmentSubtype.TRAFFIC_VIOLATION. As part of removing traffic violation-specific logic, this function should be removed along with its usages in:
apps/judicial-system/web/src/utils/formHelper.tsapps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Indictment/IndictmentCount.tsx🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
341-357: Consider removing unused traffic violation specific code.The
isTrafficViolationIndictmentCountfunction appears to be obsolete after removing the traffic violation feature flag. This function specifically checks for traffic violation subtypes, which contradicts the PR's goal of removing traffic violation-specific logic.Let's verify if this function is still in use:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of isTrafficViolationIndictmentCount rg "isTrafficViolationIndictmentCount" --type tsLength of output: 571
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Get the content of IndictmentCount.tsx and surrounding context of the usage rg "isTrafficViolationIndictmentCount" -B 5 -A 5 apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Indictment/IndictmentCount.tsx # Check if this file is being modified in the PR git diff HEAD apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Indictment/IndictmentCount.tsxLength of output: 1048
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/models/case.model.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-1000: Consider breaking down the Case model into smaller, focused entities.The Case model has grown significantly large with numerous properties and relationships. To improve maintainability and reduce complexity, consider:
- Extracting appeal-related fields into a separate
CaseAppealentity- Moving indictment-specific fields to an
Indictmententity- Creating a separate
CourtSessionentity for session-related fieldsThis would:
- Improve code organization and maintainability
- Make the domain model clearer
- Reduce the cognitive load when working with specific aspects of a case
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/CaseFiles/CaseFiles.tsx (2)
111-111: Consider using theme spacing constants.Instead of magic numbers (5, 10), consider using theme spacing constants for better maintainability and consistency with the design system.
-marginBottom={workingCase.hasCivilClaims ? 5 : 10} +marginBottom={workingCase.hasCivilClaims ? theme.spacing[5] : theme.spacing[10]}
158-164: Consider enhancing route type safety.While using constants for routes is good practice, consider implementing type-safe route handling to prevent potential runtime errors.
Consider creating a type-safe router utility:
// routes.ts export const routes = { indictmentsIndictment: (id: string) => `/indictments/indictment/${id}`, indictmentsOverview: (id: string) => `/indictments/overview/${id}`, } as const;Then use it in the component:
-previousUrl={`${constants.INDICTMENTS_INDICTMENT_ROUTE}/${workingCase.id}`} +previousUrl={routes.indictmentsIndictment(workingCase.id)}Also applies to: 169-173
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/case.service.ts(2 hunks)apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/limitedAccessCase.service.ts(0 hunks)apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/models/case.model.ts(1 hunks)apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/CaseFiles/CaseFiles.tsx(4 hunks)apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Processing/Processing.tsx(1 hunks)apps/judicial-system/web/src/utils/formHelper.ts(2 hunks)apps/judicial-system/web/src/utils/hooks/useSections/index.ts(1 hunks)libs/judicial-system/consts/src/lib/consts.ts(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/limitedAccessCase.service.ts
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/utils/hooks/useSections/index.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (6)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/CaseFiles/CaseFiles.tsx (1)
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/case.service.ts (1)
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Processing/Processing.tsx (1)
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/models/case.model.ts (1)
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/web/src/utils/formHelper.ts (1)
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
libs/judicial-system/consts/src/lib/consts.ts (1)
Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
📓 Learnings (2)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/CaseFiles/CaseFiles.tsx (2)
Learnt from: oddsson
PR: island-is/island.is#17192
File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Indictment/IndictmentCount.tsx:579-587
Timestamp: 2024-12-17T20:28:47.549Z
Learning: In the `IndictmentCount.tsx` file of the `apps/judicial-system/web` project, constraints on the vehicle registration number are planned to be removed. Avoid suggesting changes related to vehicle registration number validation for now.
Learnt from: unakb
PR: island-is/island.is#15378
File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Summary/Summary.tsx:86-100
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T15:15:11.835Z
Learning: User unakb prefers explicit case handling in switch statements for key functionalities like `getRulingDecisionTagColor` to ensure clarity and avoid assumptions that a case was overlooked.
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Processing/Processing.tsx (2)
Learnt from: gudjong
PR: island-is/island.is#15421
File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Processing/Processing.tsx:55-61
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T15:15:11.835Z
Learning: The `updateCase` method in the `apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Processing/Processing.tsx` file has its own error handling, and additional error handling in the `initialize` function is not necessary.
Learnt from: oddsson
PR: island-is/island.is#17192
File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Indictment/IndictmentCount.tsx:579-587
Timestamp: 2024-12-17T20:28:47.549Z
Learning: In the `IndictmentCount.tsx` file of the `apps/judicial-system/web` project, constraints on the vehicle registration number are planned to be removed. Avoid suggesting changes related to vehicle registration number validation for now.
🔇 Additional comments (10)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/models/case.model.ts (1)
745-745: LGTM! Comment update aligns with the standardization of indictment cases.The updated comment accurately reflects the property's purpose, removing the specific reference to traffic violations as part of the broader effort to standardize indictment case processing.
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Processing/Processing.tsx (1)
686-686: LGTM! Navigation logic simplified.The direct assignment of
nextUrltoconstants.INDICTMENTS_INDICTMENT_ROUTEaligns with the removal of traffic violation-specific feature flags, making the navigation flow more straightforward.apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/case.service.ts (2)
820-826: LGTM! Simplified case file categories.The static definition of
caseFilesCategoriesremoves complexity by eliminating traffic violation-specific conditional logic. The array now consistently includes essential categories for all cases.
848-852: LGTM! Streamlined message delivery logic.The message delivery logic has been simplified to consistently include indictment information, removing the need for traffic violation-specific checks. This change aligns with the PR's objective of standardizing indictment case processing.
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/CaseFiles/CaseFiles.tsx (2)
43-43: LGTM! Simplified validation logic.The validation has been streamlined by removing feature flag checks, making the code more maintainable.
Line range hint
134-157: LGTM! Well-structured civil claims section.The implementation follows React best practices with proper TypeScript types and consistent file upload handling.
apps/judicial-system/web/src/utils/formHelper.ts (2)
176-176: LGTM! Type definition aligns with the refactoring goal.The addition of
INDICTMENTS_INDICTMENT_ROUTEtostepValidationsTypecorrectly supports the removal of traffic violation-specific logic.
258-260: Verify the impact of simplified validation.While the changes align with the PR objectives:
- The replacement of traffic violation-specific validation with
isIndictmentStepValidis correct- However, simplifying
INDICTMENTS_CASE_FILES_ROUTEvalidation to() => trueremoves all validation checksLet's verify if any critical validations were lost:
✅ Verification successful
Validation simplification is appropriate
The change to simplify the case files route validation to
() => trueis appropriate as:
- No critical validation logic was found in the codebase
- The pattern aligns with other route validations
- The step appears to be informational rather than requiring specific validation
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for previous case files validation logic rg -A 5 "isCaseFilesStepValidIndictments" --type ts # Check for any validation calls in the indictments case files route rg -A 5 "INDICTMENTS_CASE_FILES_ROUTE.*validation" --type tsLength of output: 114
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for case files validation patterns rg "case.?files.*valid" --type ts -i # Look for validation functions in the validation utility fd "validation" -e ts -x cat {} # Search for case files related functions in the constants file fd "constants\.ts" -x cat {}Length of output: 65710
libs/judicial-system/consts/src/lib/consts.ts (2)
191-191: LGTM! Route constant follows established patterns.The new route constant follows the file's naming conventions and path structure patterns.
228-236: LGTM! Simplified route definition improves maintainability.The change from a function to a constant array:
- Removes conditional logic, aligning with the PR objective of removing feature flags
- Improves tree-shaking capabilities by using a constant instead of a function
Let's verify that all references to the old function signature have been updated:
✅ Verification successful
✅ Route changes verified as safe
The conversion from function to constant array is correctly implemented, with all usage points updated. Traffic violation references in the codebase are unrelated to this frontend route change.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining calls to prosecutorIndictmentRoutes as a function rg -l "prosecutorIndictmentRoutes\s*\(" # Search for any remaining references to traffic violation routes rg -l "INDICTMENTS_TRAFFIC_VIOLATION_ROUTE"Length of output: 85
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any usage of prosecutorIndictmentRoutes rg -l "prosecutorIndictmentRoutes" # Search for imports of prosecutorIndictmentRoutes ast-grep --pattern 'import { $$$prosecutorIndictmentRoutes$$$ } from' # Search for traffic violation related code with variations rg -l -i "traffic.?violation"Length of output: 1786
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check how prosecutorIndictmentRoutes is used in useCaseList rg -A 5 -B 5 "prosecutorIndictmentRoutes" "apps/judicial-system/web/src/utils/hooks/useCaseList/index.tsx"Length of output: 461
…subtype-remove-ff
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/file/file.service.ts (3)
158-164: Consider renaming the method to better reflect its current purpose.The method name
confirmIndictmentCaseFileis now misleading as it handles general case file confirmation, not just indictments. Consider renaming it toconfirmCaseFileorcreateConfirmedCaseFile.
174-183: Add JSDoc comments to document the method's behavior.The method's behavior and return conditions should be documented for better maintainability. Consider adding JSDoc comments explaining:
- When it returns undefined
- The structure of the confirmation data
- The purpose of hash generation
+/** + * Creates a confirmed PDF for court records and rulings. + * @param theCase The case containing ruling date and judge information + * @param file The file to be confirmed + * @param pdf The original PDF buffer + * @returns A binary string of the confirmed PDF or undefined if conditions aren't met + */ private async confirmIndictmentCaseFile(
Line range hint
1-583: Consider a broader refactoring to remove remaining indictment-specific logic.Several methods still contain indictment-specific checks (e.g.,
shouldGetConfirmedDocument,createCaseFile). To align with the PR's objective of removing feature flags:
- Consider extracting document confirmation logic into a separate service
- Replace type-based branching with more generic handling
- Update the message queue logic to use case-type-agnostic events
This would make the codebase more maintainable and consistent with the removal of indictment-specific handling.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/file/file.service.ts(2 hunks)apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/file/test/fileController/uploadCaseFileToCourt.spec.ts(0 hunks)apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/file/test/internalFileController/deliverCaseFileToCourt.spec.ts(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/file/test/fileController/uploadCaseFileToCourt.spec.ts
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/file/test/internalFileController/deliverCaseFileToCourt.spec.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/file/file.service.ts (1)
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: tests (judicial-system-backend)
Remove feature flag for combo indictments
Asana
What
This PR removes the feature flag for multiple subtypes on a single indictment. In doing so, we also remove the indictment upload field, as we now generate all indictments and none have to be uploaded.
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
Feature Removal
Route and Navigation Changes
Validation Updates
Case File Handling
Performance Improvements
These changes represent a significant simplification of the judicial system's case management workflow, focusing on a more uniform approach to handling indictment cases.