-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ensure all servers listen on 0.0.0.0 #6209
Comments
Hi @yurishkuro ,
Possible Enhancements:
Let me know your thoughts on above. Thanks!! PS: new to Jaeger, thought would give this a try to get started. |
|
[1] I was referring to HotROD integration tests that includes hotrod app sending data via OTLP to all-in-one ---> Thanks for clarifying! will check the HotROD Integration test and update the conversation. [3] the server has to be reachable to respond with 404. ---> Yaa actually, my point was the same. 404 means reachable. and the curl gave 404 with the --set receivers.otlp.protocols.http.endpoint=0.0.0.0:4318 --set receivers.otlp.protocols.grpc.endpoint=0.0.0.0:4317 over-rides . Without setting above over-rides, it was giving "Recv failure: Connection reset by peer jaeger". [2] and [4] question was about all other ports that jaeger opens ---> Understood. would check for the rest of the ports that Jaeger opens and if the hostPorts are logged. appreciate your inputs! Thanks! |
Did a quick check on [1] , for the jaeger v2 docker CI, we do set the below over-rides in docker-compose-v2.yml . This should allow the hotrod example to send metrics to otlp collector over http://jaeger:4318.
|
Right, but we added them after the OTEL upgrade was done and presumably our build was still green. I am verifying that now: #6226 |
## Which problem is this PR solving? - Part of #6209 - The example should be working without these overrides ## Description of the changes - Remove overrides - Add explicit 0.0.0.0 host to all-in-one config ## How was this change tested? - CI --------- Signed-off-by: Yuri Shkuro <[email protected]>
Thanks for taking it forward @yurishkuro ! Was trying to follow various issues around this.
|
The upstream issue with 0.0.0.0 vs. local host strikes again (#6207).
:port
, which is equivalent)Related open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector#11713
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: