Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
revised CHANGELOG after merge of agda#2114
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
jamesmckinna committed Oct 4, 2023
1 parent 3fb6e33 commit 4b52284
Showing 1 changed file with 6 additions and 10 deletions.
16 changes: 6 additions & 10 deletions CHANGELOG.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -802,12 +802,12 @@ Non-backwards compatible changes
were introduced in the corresponding `Relation.Binary.Properties` modules, for re-export.

* Now they are introduced as definitions in the corresponding `Relation.Binary.Bundles`,
together with, for uniformity's sake, an additional negated symbol `__` for `Preorder`.
together with, for uniformity's sake, an additional negated symbol `__` for `Preorder`.
NB `_≮_` is now introduced *earlier* in the hierarchy, at `StrictPartialOrder`, which
incurs some rather complicated deprecation gymnastics...

* Accordingly, in fact we now have `__` (in `TotalPreorder`) and `_≰_` (in `Poset`)
as renamed `public` re-exports from `_≁_` in `Preorder`.
* Accordingly, in fact we now have `__` (in `Poset`) as a renamed `public` re-export
from `_⋦_` in `Preorder`, with `TotalPreorder` inheriting `_⋦_` from `Preorder`.

* As knock-on changes, public re-exports of `Preorder`, `Poset`, `StrictPartialOrder`
in derived bundles also now need to re-export the various new symbols accordingly.
Expand All @@ -824,13 +824,9 @@ Non-backwards compatible changes
only on the the underlying `Structures` such as `IsPartialOrder` etc., are unable
to make use of the new symbols.

* NB (issues #2096 #2098) the corresponding situation regarding the `flip`ped
relation symbols `_≥_`, `_>_` (and their negated versions!) has not (yet) been
addressed; to develop a parallel architecture to that above, there would need
to be a suitable symbol for the flipped relation `_∼_` (and its negation!) in
`Relation.Bundles.Preorder`, currently handled purely semantically via `flip ∼` in
`Relation.Binary.Properties.Preorder`, `Relation.Binary.Construct.Flip.{Ord|EqAndOrd}`
etc. Ditto. the strict ordering relation `_<_` defined in `Relation.Binary.Properties.Poset`...
* NB (issue #2098) the corresponding situation regarding the `flip`ped relation
symbols `_≥_`, `_>_` (and their negated versions!) has not (yet) been addressed.
Ditto. the strict ordering relation `_<_` defined in `Relation.Binary.Properties.Poset`...

### Changes to triple reasoning interface

Expand Down

0 comments on commit 4b52284

Please sign in to comment.