[JENKINS-61855] Add Support for Doxygen Warnings.

[code-arnab]

Testing done

FIXES - JENKINS-61855

Added Support for Doxygen Warnings having format -
file_path(line):col: Warning/Error: message along with the existing format -
file_path:line:col: Warning/Error: message

Submitter checklist

• Make sure you are opening from a topic/feature/bugfix branch (right side) and not your main branch!
• Ensure that the pull request title represents the desired changelog entry
• Please describe what you did
• Link to relevant issues in GitHub or Jira
• Link to relevant pull requests, esp. upstream and downstream changes
• Ensure you have provided tests - that demonstrates feature works or fixes the issue

[code-arnab]

Hello @uhafner can you please review this?

[code-arnab]

Hello @uhafner even though there is no check style warnings now why the tests are failing?
Also the Jenkins build is showing this before error, is this relevant -
Comparing [edu.hm.hafner:analysis-model:jar:13.1.0] against [edu.hm.hafner:analysis-model:jar:13.2.0-rc6073.5950e5eb_6fa_b_] (including their transitive dependencies).

Isn't 13.1.0 is the latest? I've also pulled everything before pushing

[uhafner]

RevApi is complaining that you changed the base class of an API class. Normally, this is a breaking change.

However, all parsers are not part of the API now. I fixed the RevApi configuration in b18d9c4

Can you please rebase and retry?

[code-arnab]

RevApi is complaining that you changed the base class of an API class. Normally, this is a breaking change.

However, all parsers are not part of the API now. I fixed the RevApi configuration in b18d9c4

Can you please rebase and retry?

Got it! I will retry again after rebasing.

[code-arnab]

Hello @uhafner I've rebased to the latest main and the errors are gone.
I have a question - Do you think there is any need of having the isMessageContinuation method, that I have borrowed from GCC4 Parser?

[uhafner]

The rest looks good. I think reusing the other method is fine...

[uhafner]

Can't you make the method package private and static in GccParser? Then we can reuse it.

[code-arnab]

Yup. You're right! Good suggestion

[code-arnab]

I've made the requested changes.

[uhafner]

Thanks!