Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[JEP-216] Add SPI for localized resource lookup #156

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 8, 2019

Conversation

daniel-beck
Copy link
Member

@daniel-beck daniel-beck commented Feb 5, 2019

*
* <ul>
* <li>A full URL represented as string. In Jenkins this is typically plugin webapp resources.</li>
* <li>A path with leading slash. These are actual webapp resources, with that being the implicit base directory.</li>
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A potentially better design would be to have independent methods lookupUrl and lookupPath. Thoughts?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can't figure out the use cases. The interface method may not need to take care of those details.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm generally in favor of using explicitly named separate methods when there is a clear separation of responsibility or implementation. In this case, though, I'm not sure that separation exists. Both forms are valid types of URLs.

Is there some reason we think the caller or implementor might need to handle these two forms differently or separately?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there some reason we think the caller or implementor might need to handle these two forms differently or separately?

It's most of what https://github.com/daniel-beck/localization-support-plugin/blob/master/src/main/java/io/jenkins/plugins/localization/support/stapler/LocaleDrivenResourceProviderImpl.java does.

"From a plugin or not" is the same distinction as the two variants documented here.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Both forms are valid types of URLs.

Note that the second one (plugin resources) is just /path/on/file/system pointing to $JENKINS_HOME/plugins/<ID>/….


private static final Logger LOGGER = Logger.getLogger(LocaleDrivenResourceProvider.class.getName());

private static synchronized List<LocaleDrivenResourceProvider> getLocaleDrivenResourceProviders() {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You can limit the synchronization to after you check for null (but then check for null again). Make the field volatile and you've got a threadsafe lazy initialized value.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm going with @jglick's verbatim advice from an earlier equivalent change here, and not touching this 😃

Copy link
Contributor

@jeffret-b jeffret-b left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

*
* <ul>
* <li>A full URL represented as string. In Jenkins this is typically plugin webapp resources.</li>
* <li>A path with leading slash. These are actual webapp resources, with that being the implicit base directory.</li>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm generally in favor of using explicitly named separate methods when there is a clear separation of responsibility or implementation. In this case, though, I'm not sure that separation exists. Both forms are valid types of URLs.

Is there some reason we think the caller or implementor might need to handle these two forms differently or separately?

Copy link
Contributor

@Wadeck Wadeck left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code seems good, only small nits.


private static List<LocaleDrivenResourceProvider> localeDrivenResourceProviders;

private static final Logger LOGGER = Logger.getLogger(LocaleDrivenResourceProvider.class.getName());
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: field declarations should be done before methods declarations

*
* This cannot be made a property of WebApp as other behavior customizations, as webapp resource lookup is done before we have StaplerRequest/StaplerResponse.
*/
public abstract class LocaleDrivenResourceProvider {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Add the implements ExtensionPoint ?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can't, that's in Jenkins.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

localeDrivenResourceProviders = new ArrayList<>();
for (LocaleDrivenResourceProvider provider : ServiceLoader.load(LocaleDrivenResourceProvider.class)) {
localeDrivenResourceProviders.add(provider);
LOGGER.log(Level.INFO, "Registered LocaleDrivenResourceProvider: " + provider);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Probably could be made FINE since this is not exactly interesting news to an admin to be shown on every startup.

@jglick jglick merged commit 08b13de into jenkinsci:master Apr 8, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Plugin does not support webapp resource files
6 participants