Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue #1389 fixed in parser_compute_indicies by resolving local variable hiding. #1410

Merged

Conversation

ktorpi
Copy link
Contributor

@ktorpi ktorpi commented Oct 26, 2016

Issue #1389 fixed in parser_compute_inicies by resolving local variable hiding.

JerryScript-DCO-1.0-Signed-off-by: István Kádár [email protected]

@ktorpi ktorpi force-pushed the parser_literal_index_fix branch from 450940b to fe5c68b Compare October 26, 2016 14:37
@LaszloLango LaszloLango changed the title Issue #1389 fixed in parser_compute_inicies by resolving local variable hiding. Issue #1389 fixed in parser_compute_indicies by resolving local variable hiding. Oct 27, 2016

function x(){}

255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295,296,297,298,299,300,301,302,303,304,305,306,307,308,309,310,311,312,313,314,315,316,317,318,319,320,321,322,323,324,325,326,327,328,329,330,331,332,333,334,335,336,337,338,339,340,341,342,343,344,345,346,347,348,349,350,351,352,353,354,355,356,357,358,359,360,361,362,363,364,365,366,367,368,369,370,371,372,373,374,375,376,377,378,379,380,381,382,383,384,385,386,387,388,389,390,391,392,393,394,395,396,397,398,399,400,401,402,403,404,405,406,407,408,409,410,411,412,413,414,415,416,417,418,419,420,421,422,423,424,425,426,427,428,429,430,431,432,433,434,435,436,437,438,439,440,441,442,443,444,445,446,447,448,449,450,451,452,453,454,455,456,457,458,459,460,461,462,463,464,465,466,467,468,469,470,471,472,473,474,475,476,477,478,479,480,481,482,483,484,485,486,487,488,489,490,491,492,493,494,495,496,497,498,499,500,501,502,503,504,505,506,507,508,509, 510, 511, 512
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This test different, than that mentioned in #1389 . Is this correct? Are you sure these tests are equal?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, this simplified test case also works. However please cut the lines after 80 character and the numbers should be strings to avoid number optimizations. So:

"255", "256", ...
or
"a1", "a2", ... would be even better

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok, good to me then.

@LaszloLango
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

@ktorpi ktorpi force-pushed the parser_literal_index_fix branch 2 times, most recently from e3fd88a to 0a185b4 Compare October 28, 2016 11:01
…solving local variable hiding.

JerryScript-DCO-1.0-Signed-off-by: István Kádár [email protected]
@ktorpi ktorpi force-pushed the parser_literal_index_fix branch from 0a185b4 to 0cb191b Compare October 28, 2016 11:28
@zherczeg
Copy link
Member

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants