Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Corrected parentheses in Date examples #223

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 23, 2021
Merged

Corrected parentheses in Date examples #223

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 23, 2021

Conversation

JanSawicki
Copy link
Contributor

@JanSawicki JanSawicki commented Jul 16, 2019

What

Added missing parentheses in examples about date checking in Readme.

Why

To save time and prevent confusion of people who copy-paste the examples.

Notes

Housekeeping

  • Unit tests
  • Documentation is up to date
  • No additional lint warnings
  • Typescript definitions are added/updated where relevant

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #223 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##           master   #223   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage     100%   100%           
=====================================
  Files         109    109           
  Lines         554    554           
  Branches       97     97           
=====================================
  Hits          554    554

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1329f78...0acc667. Read the comment docs.

@keeganwitt keeganwitt mentioned this pull request Jun 11, 2021
4 tasks
@rickhanlonii rickhanlonii merged commit feee428 into jest-community:master Jun 23, 2021
@rickhanlonii
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants