-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove accidentally included package-info.class in all packages #7855
Comments
There's been no updates to the pom for the compact3 build in a long time. https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/blob/jetty-9.4.x/aggregates/jetty-all-compact3/pom.xml The most recent update was 17 months ago. (commit 3e35ec3) Not sure how you see differences in 9.4.45 to 9.4.46. Do we need another exclusion on |
@joakime I've concluded that this is not a compact3 specific issue - it is just where I noticed it first since that is the build we consume. Sorry for the red herring. See the following diff just from standard profile distributions published at maven central: |
I can confirm that @olamy any thoughts? |
The |
Confirmed, |
This behavior change in |
…class files Signed-off-by: Joakim Erdfelt <[email protected]>
Ok, thanks for the confirmation on your end. |
I opened PR #7856 to configure the maven-compiler-plugin to not do that anymore on our builds. You can compile with |
…class files (#7856) Signed-off-by: Joakim Erdfelt <[email protected]>
…class files Cherry-pick of commit 1678a21 Signed-off-by: Joakim Erdfelt <[email protected]>
…class files (#7857) Cherry-pick of commit 1678a21 Signed-off-by: Joakim Erdfelt <[email protected]>
Jetty version
jetty-all-compact3-9.4.46.v20220331.jar vs jetty-all-compact3-9.4.45.v20220203.jar
Java version
N/A
Question
I observed in a diff of the contents of jetty-all-compact3-9.4.45 and jetty-all-compact3-9.4.46 that the latter now contains a package-info.class at every package. See:
It was not immediately clear to me from the release notes where this may have been introduced. I know compact3 can be an often overlooked profile, and while the file size increase is marginal, I was curious if this was intentional?
Maybe compact3 has nothing to do with it - I'll compare this to the standard profile as well. UPDATE: It is also in the standard distributions, so nothing to do with compact3 I think.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: