Pi Zero W v1.1 support added to rpihw.c

[Gadgetoid]

Title says it all, really! Happy IoTing.

[tavalin]

I've tested the PR on my Pi Zero W and it works. Any chance on getting the PR merged?

[Boeeerb]

Tested here also and confirm working on this PR

[tavalin]

@jgarff any reason this hasn't been merged but a more recent PR on the same file has?

[Gadgetoid]

I'm unaware of Revision ID 0x9200c1 and it's not documented at http://elinux.org/RPi_HardwareHistory - yet it's been merged into rpihw.c as "Pi Zero W". This is not the Revision ID reported by the Zero Ws that we distribute. Albeit it could be a pre-release that I haven't come across, or a later release that hasn't trickled down yet, but it's still not the Revision ID used by the vast majority of Pi Zeros that I'm aware of.

I've got to toss my hat in the ring here. Why in the world was #164 merged and not my launch day PR?

pi@zerowstem:~ $ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor       : 0
model name      : ARMv6-compatible processor rev 7 (v6l)
BogoMIPS        : 697.95
Features        : half thumb fastmult vfp edsp java tls
CPU implementer : 0x41
CPU architecture: 7
CPU variant     : 0x0
CPU part        : 0xb76
CPU revision    : 7

Hardware        : BCM2708
Revision        : 9000c1
Serial          : 000000006e4fa20b

[electrokean]

@Gadgetoid Based on the other Rev IDs listed on elinux.org it would seem that 0x9200c1 may be a board manufactured by Embest/Farnell, rather than Sony

[penfold42]

Can we merge this please ?

I need to get Hyperion packages rebuilt with support for both zero W revisions

Thanks.

[jgarff]

As always, I appreciate your pull request. Sorry, it looks like this fix was previously merged. I'm going to close this request as a duplicate. Thanks.

[tavalin]

@jgarff why have you closed this? There are apparently two variants of the Pi Zero so this PR should still be valid.

[tavalin]

Nevermind just noticed there was yet another PR for Pi Zero.