Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rewrite rebasing in jj split using transform_descendants() #3550

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 21, 2024

Conversation

emesterhazy
Copy link
Contributor

This is following on the rewrite for parallelize.

Since rebase_descendants from rebase.rs is no longer used outside of that file, it can be made private again.

Copy link
Member

@martinvonz martinvonz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! I'm happy to see rebase_descendants() made private again. That will make it easier for @bnjmnt4n to clean that up later.

I'm approving this because it seems clearly not specific to google, but please give non-googlers a chance to review.

cli/src/commands/split.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
cli/src/commands/split.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
cli/src/commands/split.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
emesterhazy added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 20, 2024
This would have caught a bug in #3550
that otherwise might have slipped through.
This would have caught a bug in #3550
that otherwise might have slipped through.
This is following on the rewrite for `parallelize`.

- #3521

Since rebase_descendants from rebase.rs is no longer used outside of that file,
it can be made private again.
@emesterhazy
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for taking a look Yuya. I'll merge this now.

@emesterhazy emesterhazy merged commit e0c53bc into main Apr 21, 2024
16 checks passed
@emesterhazy emesterhazy deleted the push-stnynwusvolv branch April 21, 2024 16:21
emesterhazy added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 21, 2024
This would have caught a bug in #3550
that otherwise might have slipped through.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants