Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Re-allow overrides of access_key_names #1026

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 11, 2021
Merged

Conversation

toddgardner
Copy link
Contributor

This change:

b13efd9

swapped from using self.access_key_names to S3Boto3Storage.access_key_names; it's unclear if that was intentional or not, but that means it does not accept overrides; we relied on overrides to use some bucket specific keys provided by rook ceph.

This change:

jschneier@b13efd9

swapped from using `self.access_key_names` to `S3Boto3Storage.access_key_names`; it's unclear if that was intentional or not, but that means it does not accept overrides; we relied on overrides to use some bucket specific keys provided by rook ceph.
@jschneier jschneier merged commit fd2170a into jschneier:master Sep 11, 2021
@jschneier
Copy link
Owner

Thanks. Not intentional.

jschneier pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2021
* Re-allow override of access_key_names, etc.

This change:

b13efd9

swapped from using `self.access_key_names` to `S3Boto3Storage.access_key_names`; it's unclear if that was intentional or not, but that means it does not accept overrides; we relied on overrides to use some bucket specific keys provided by rook ceph.

* Update s3boto3.py
mlazowik pushed a commit to qedsoftware/django-storages that referenced this pull request Mar 9, 2022
* Re-allow override of access_key_names, etc.

This change:

jschneier@b13efd9

swapped from using `self.access_key_names` to `S3Boto3Storage.access_key_names`; it's unclear if that was intentional or not, but that means it does not accept overrides; we relied on overrides to use some bucket specific keys provided by rook ceph.

* Update s3boto3.py
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants