-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Usability review for 4.1 #533
Comments
One thing, I think we moved the celltoolbar selector from toolbar to menu. Is that API change ? |
The DOM className ? if so, yeah I'd consider that an API change - it will break peoples custom css |
I don't consider our DOM class names like the celltoolbar to be public API. Part of releasing new features is taking the time to get them as right as I should be able to spend time on this over the weekend and early next week. On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Jonathan Frederic <[email protected]
Brian E. Granger |
No I mean the actual UI element is now gone. I I found it because I knew there was a PR for that, and I knew what to look for. I'm not against the new location in the menu, I just think that a |
Ahh, got it. Any ideas on how to transition users to the new location more On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Matthias Bussonnier <
Brian E. Granger |
@jhamrick Any usability thoughts on the changes to Cell Toolbar -> Create Assignment and nbgrader? |
Thanks for the ping. I like something like Matthias' suggestion, though On Saturday, October 24, 2015, Carol Willing [email protected]
|
@ellisonbg how's the usability study coming along? Any issues arise yet that we can start to address? |
Been working on it this morning. Found one just now - when you are using the command palette and I have More to come soon... On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Jonathan Frederic <
Brian E. Granger |
I'm aware of this one there is already an issue open somewhere, |
Just had a look at this. I love the UI deprecation for the celltoolbar -- nice job @Carreau ! Seems like everything still works fine with nbgrader (I think the tests will break, but the actual functionality seems to be ok). One note on the help for the keyboard shortcuts which might be potentially confusing -- the closeness of the description of "command mode" and the command key implies that they have something to do with each other (which they don't): I would suggest moving the section about the key names into a different box (maybe yellow or green or something) and out of the one that describes the different modes. Initially I was confused because I thought maybe the key bindings had changed and command had something to do with command mode now -- and I'm used to using the notebook 😄 |
I had the same experience as Jess with that. I think using a separate box On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Jessica B. Hamrick <
Brian E. Granger |
Some more things:
Edit: see #665 |
As described By Jess and Brian in jupyter#533
You can unmark individual cells with ctrl-shift or do the "unmark-all-cell" But we should probably start to create separate issues for the things we On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Jessica B. Hamrick <
Brian E. Granger |
Ok, I will open a new issue then. |
Escape will deselect once #657 will be merged. |
How do you "undo merge" ? With undo delete ? |
(and Brian meant unselect with Ctrl-Space not shift) |
Ok, I think having stuff be deselected with "escape" would make that less surprising for me. I was looking for a menu option and found none. The problem with relying on the command palette there is because users won't necessarily know the correct terminology -- e.g. I didn't know it was called "marked" (I would have thought to look for "selected"). Having unmarking being bound to escape seems intuitive, though. |
Jess makes a good point - do you think we should also have an edit menu On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Jessica B. Hamrick <
Brian E. Granger |
Ok, all the various PRs I opened today should address I think all my usability concerns about the cell marking. |
We have a lot of new Ui in the notebook that need a solid overall usability review before the 4.1 release. I can work on this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: