Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Call for interest: migrate Cal Poly comment extension to JupyterLab core #12032

Open
ellisonbg opened this issue Feb 9, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Comments

@ellisonbg
Copy link
Contributor

Problem

The Cal Poly Jupyter interns have created a JupyterLab extension for commenting on notebooks and text files. This integrates with the new Yjs data models. There is strong interest from the Jupyter user community to have commenting capabilities and we are evaluating if we should begin work to migrate the existing commenting extension into core. Here is the link to the existing repo:

https://github.com/jupytercalpoly/jupyterlab-comments

There would be a significant amount of work required to bring this extension over to core and get it ready for users. The purpose of this issue is as a call for interest to see who would be interested in working on this. Once we get critical mass, we can begin to discuss the next steps.

Proposed Solution

Create an informal working group of people who would like to help improve and potentially merge https://github.com/jupytercalpoly/jupyterlab-comments into JupyterLab core.

Additional context

There is an existing commenting extension in the JupyterLab GitHub org that is older, probably less capable and hasn't been maintained for a while. We would need to figure out what to do with this code base along the way.

@ellisonbg ellisonbg added enhancement status:Needs Triage Applied to new issues that need triage labels Feb 9, 2022
@ellisonbg
Copy link
Contributor Author

Opps, if you are interested in working on this, please leave your GitHub username as a comment on this issue.

@jasongrout
Copy link
Contributor

#9885 was closed in deference to this, but I just want to call out that there is some interesting discussion there about implementation details, such as interaction with the RTC system.

@aiqc
Copy link

aiqc commented May 18, 2022

Mentioned in #12032

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
No open projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants