Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AI Connectivity Tester command and page #76

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 14, 2025
Merged

AI Connectivity Tester command and page #76

merged 5 commits into from
Jan 14, 2025

Conversation

justyns
Copy link
Owner

@justyns justyns commented Jan 13, 2025

Started working on this while doing some troubleshooting locally for #74 and decided it'd be a nice feature to have.

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Added support for retrieving a list of models from OpenAI and Ollama providers.
    • Introduced AI Connectivity Test command and page to verify API functionality.
  • Improvements

    • Enhanced error logging for SSE events.
    • Added ability to check model availability and API connectivity.
  • Documentation

    • Updated changelog with new features and improvements.
    • Added documentation for AI Connectivity Test command.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 13, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces enhancements to the AI model interaction capabilities. Key changes include the addition of a listModels() method to the OpenAI and Ollama providers for retrieving available models. A new Connectivity Test command and page have been implemented to verify API functionality, allowing users to diagnose and troubleshoot model configurations. Additionally, improvements have been made to error handling and logging for model connectivity tests, enhancing insights into API interactions.

Changes

File Change Summary
docs/Changelog.md Updated with new features for model listing and connectivity testing
docs/Commands/AI: Connectivity Test.md New documentation for Connectivity Test command
src/connectivity.ts Added functions for connectivity testing, including updateConnectivityTestPage() and connectivityTestCommand()
src/interfaces/Provider.ts Added listModels() method to ProviderInterface and AbstractProvider
src/mocks/mockproviders.ts Implemented listModels() method in MockProvider
src/providers/ollama.ts Added listModels() method to fetch Ollama models
src/providers/openai.ts Added listModels() method to retrieve OpenAI models
src/providers/gemini.ts Updated name property to use override keyword
src/types.d.ts Added TypeScript declarations for external modules
src/utils.test.ts Removed unused log import

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant ConnectivityTestCommand
    participant ProviderInterface
    participant Providers
    
    User->>ConnectivityTestCommand: Trigger Connectivity Test
    ConnectivityTestCommand->>ProviderInterface: listModels()
    ProviderInterface->>Providers: Retrieve available models
    Providers-->>ProviderInterface: Return model list
    ProviderInterface-->>ConnectivityTestCommand: Model list
    ConnectivityTestCommand->>ConnectivityTestCommand: Run connectivity tests
    ConnectivityTestCommand-->>User: Display test results
Loading

Possibly related PRs

  • Add Ollama text/llm provider #60: The main PR introduces support for retrieving a list of models from OpenAI and Ollama providers, which is directly related to the changes in the OpenAIProvider and OllamaProvider classes in this PR, where a listModels method is added to both providers for fetching available models.
  • Upgrade to Silverbullet 0.10.1, deno 2, and deno std 0.224.0 #73: The changelog in the main PR mentions updates related to the Silverbullet library, which includes enhancements to the functionality of the OpenAIProvider and OllamaProvider as part of the overall upgrade to version 0.10.1, indicating that the changes in the main PR are relevant to the updates in this PR.

Suggested labels

documentation

Finishing Touches

  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 5

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
src/connectivity.ts (1)

54-257: Address formatting issues for consistency

There are formatting inconsistencies in the code, such as indentation and line breaks. Please format the code using the project's preferred formatting tool to maintain code style consistency.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)

[error] 73-74: The assignment should not be in an expression.

The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.

(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)


[error] 81-82: The assignment should not be in an expression.

The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.

(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)


[error] 89-90: The assignment should not be in an expression.

The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.

(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)


[error] 142-143: The assignment should not be in an expression.

The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.

(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)

🪛 GitHub Actions: Deno build test and push

[error] File has formatting issues with inconsistent indentation and line breaks

src/providers/ollama.ts (1)

56-58: Fix formatting for consistent code style

There are formatting issues around lines 56-58 with inconsistent braces and whitespace. Please ensure the code follows the project's formatting guidelines.

Apply this diff:

           `${this.baseUrl.replace(/\/v1\/?/, "")}/api/tags`,
-
-          {
+          {

This adjusts the placement of the braces to be consistent.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Deno build test and push

[error] 57-58: Incorrect formatting around line 57-58 with inconsistent braces and whitespace

src/providers/openai.ts (1)

125-159: Consider type improvements and error message enhancements.

The implementation is solid but could benefit from:

  1. Define a proper type for the OpenAI model response instead of using 'any'
  2. Include more specific error messages that guide users toward resolution

Consider this improvement:

+interface OpenAIModel {
+  id: string;
+  // Add other relevant fields from the OpenAI API response
+}

 async listModels(): Promise<string[]> {
   // ... existing code ...
-  return data.data.map((model: any) => model.id);
+  return data.data.map((model: OpenAIModel) => model.id);
 }

Also, enhance error messages:

-throw new Error(`HTTP error, status: ${response.status}`);
+throw new Error(`Failed to fetch OpenAI models. Status: ${response.status}. Please verify your API key and network connection.`);

-throw new Error("Invalid response from OpenAI models endpoint.");
+throw new Error("Invalid response format from OpenAI models endpoint. Please check if the API version is compatible.");
docs/Commands/AI: Connectivity Test.md (1)

1-8: Enhance command documentation with more details.

While the basic documentation is in place, it would be more helpful to users if it included:

  • Examples of specific tests that are run
  • Expected outcomes and common error scenarios
  • Any configuration prerequisites

Consider expanding the documentation like this:

 This command redirects the client to a page which runs various tests against the current configuration.  It's meant to
 locate issues with the currently selected models.
+
+## Tests Performed
+- Model availability check
+- API connectivity verification
+- Authentication validation
+
+## Common Issues
+- Invalid API keys
+- Network connectivity problems
+- Misconfigured base URLs
+
+## Prerequisites
+- Configured AI provider settings
+- Valid API credentials
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c392bd3 and be6bc12.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
  • README.md is excluded by none and included by none
  • silverbullet-ai.plug.js is excluded by !silverbullet-ai.plug.js and included by none
  • silverbullet-ai.plug.yaml is excluded by none and included by none
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • docs/Changelog.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/Commands/AI: Connectivity Test.md (1 hunks)
  • src/connectivity.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/interfaces/Provider.ts (2 hunks)
  • src/mocks/mockproviders.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/providers/ollama.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/providers/openai.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (7)
src/interfaces/Provider.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.ts: Review these typescript files for best practices, readability, and DRY.

src/providers/ollama.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.ts: Review these typescript files for best practices, readability, and DRY.

docs/Changelog.md (1)

Pattern **/*.md: Review these markdown files. They are written for a markdown note taking tool called Silverbullet, and may contain extra syntax not typically found in markdown.

Ensure any documentation makes sense and is good.

src/mocks/mockproviders.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.ts: Review these typescript files for best practices, readability, and DRY.

docs/Commands/AI: Connectivity Test.md (1)

Pattern **/*.md: Review these markdown files. They are written for a markdown note taking tool called Silverbullet, and may contain extra syntax not typically found in markdown.

Ensure any documentation makes sense and is good.

src/connectivity.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.ts: Review these typescript files for best practices, readability, and DRY.

src/providers/openai.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.ts: Review these typescript files for best practices, readability, and DRY.

🪛 GitHub Actions: Deno build test and push
src/providers/ollama.ts

[error] 57-58: Incorrect formatting around line 57-58 with inconsistent braces and whitespace

src/mocks/mockproviders.ts

[error] 35-35: Missing comma after this.modelName in comment line

src/connectivity.ts

[error] File has formatting issues with inconsistent indentation and line breaks

🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
src/connectivity.ts

[error] 73-74: The assignment should not be in an expression.

The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.

(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)


[error] 81-82: The assignment should not be in an expression.

The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.

(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)


[error] 89-90: The assignment should not be in an expression.

The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.

(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)


[error] 142-143: The assignment should not be in an expression.

The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.

(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/interfaces/Provider.ts (1)

26-26: LGTM! Clean interface addition.

The new listModels method is well-defined with an appropriate return type for async model listing.

docs/Changelog.md (1)

7-8: LGTM! Clear and well-formatted changelog entries.

The new features are properly documented in the changelog, following the established format.

Comment on lines 81 to 82
aiSettings.imageModels.forEach(m => text += `* ${m.name}\n`);
text += "\n";
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Avoid assignments within expressions for clarity

Similar to the previous comment, assigning to text within the forEach callback can be unclear. Refactor using a loop for better readability.

Apply this diff:

-aiSettings.imageModels.forEach(m => text += `* ${m.name}\n`);
+for (const m of aiSettings.imageModels) {
+  text += `* ${m.name}\n`;
+}
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
aiSettings.imageModels.forEach(m => text += `* ${m.name}\n`);
text += "\n";
for (const m of aiSettings.imageModels) {
text += `* ${m.name}\n`;
}
text += "\n";
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)

[error] 81-82: The assignment should not be in an expression.

The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.

(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)

🪛 GitHub Actions: Deno build test and push

[error] File has formatting issues with inconsistent indentation and line breaks

Comment on lines +142 to +143
text += "\n";
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Avoid assignments within expressions for clarity

Using assignment within the forEach can lead to confusion. Refactor to a loop to make the code more understandable.

Apply this diff:

-availableModels.forEach(model => text += `* \`${model}\`\n`);
+for (const model of availableModels) {
+  text += `* \`${model}\`\n`;
+}

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)

[error] 142-143: The assignment should not be in an expression.

The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.

(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)

🪛 GitHub Actions: Deno build test and push

[error] File has formatting issues with inconsistent indentation and line breaks

Comment on lines 89 to 90
aiSettings.embeddingModels.forEach(m => text += `* ${m.name}\n`);
text += "\n";
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Avoid assignments within expressions for clarity

Again, avoid assigning to text within the forEach callback. Refactoring will enhance clarity.

Apply this diff:

-aiSettings.embeddingModels.forEach(m => text += `* ${m.name}\n`);
+for (const m of aiSettings.embeddingModels) {
+  text += `* ${m.name}\n`;
+}
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
aiSettings.embeddingModels.forEach(m => text += `* ${m.name}\n`);
text += "\n";
for (const m of aiSettings.embeddingModels) {
text += `* ${m.name}\n`;
}
text += "\n";
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)

[error] 89-90: The assignment should not be in an expression.

The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.

(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)

🪛 GitHub Actions: Deno build test and push

[error] File has formatting issues with inconsistent indentation and line breaks

Comment on lines 73 to 74
aiSettings.textModels.forEach(m => text += `* ${m.name}\n`);
text += "\n";
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Avoid assignments within expressions for clarity

Assigning to text within the forEach callback can be confusing and may lead to unintended side effects. Consider refactoring using a loop to improve readability.

Apply this diff to refactor the code:

-aiSettings.textModels.forEach(m => text += `* ${m.name}\n`);
+for (const m of aiSettings.textModels) {
+  text += `* ${m.name}\n`;
+}
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
aiSettings.textModels.forEach(m => text += `* ${m.name}\n`);
text += "\n";
for (const m of aiSettings.textModels) {
text += `* ${m.name}\n`;
}
text += "\n";
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)

[error] 73-74: The assignment should not be in an expression.

The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.

(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)

🪛 GitHub Actions: Deno build test and push

[error] File has formatting issues with inconsistent indentation and line breaks

"mock-gpt-3.5",
"mock-gpt-4",
"mock-claude-2",
this.modelName // Include the currently configured model
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Add missing comma and adjust comment placement

There's a missing comma after this.modelName, which can cause a syntax error. Also, the inline comment should be placed correctly to avoid confusion.

Apply this diff to fix the issue:

         "mock-claude-2",
-        this.modelName // Include the currently configured model
+        this.modelName, // Include the currently configured model

Alternatively, move the comment to its own line:

         "mock-claude-2",
+        // Include the currently configured model
         this.modelName,

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Deno build test and push

[error] 35-35: Missing comma after this.modelName in comment line

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Nitpick comments (9)
src/init.ts (1)

253-254: Consider using the log utility for error logging.

For consistency with the rest of the codebase, consider using the existing log() utility instead of console.error.

-    console.error("Error reading secret:", _error);
+    log("client", "Error reading secret:", _error);
src/providers/gemini.ts (3)

Line range hint 33-45: Consider improving type safety in listModels().

The method currently returns Promise<any>. Consider defining a proper interface for the model response to improve type safety and documentation.

+ interface GeminiModel {
+   name: string;
+   version: string;
+   displayName?: string;
+   description?: string;
+ }

- async listModels(): Promise<any> {
+ async listModels(): Promise<GeminiModel[]> {

Line range hint 91-151: Clean up commented console.logs and enhance error handling in streamChat.

The method contains several commented-out console.log statements and could benefit from more robust error handling.

Consider:

  1. Removing commented debug logs
  2. Adding more context to error messages
  3. Implementing proper error recovery in the SSE event handlers
- // console.log("Starting gemini api call to ", sseUrl);
- // console.log("sseOptions", sseOptions);
+ const handleStreamError = (error: Error, context: string) => {
+   const errorMessage = `Gemini stream error in ${context}: ${error.message}`;
+   console.error(errorMessage);
+   if (onDataReceived) onDataReceived(`Error: ${errorMessage}`);
+   source.close();
+ };

  source.addEventListener("error", (e: sseEvent) => {
-   console.error("SSE error:", e);
+   handleStreamError(new Error(e.data || 'Unknown SSE error'), 'event listener');
    source.close();
  });

Line range hint 196-213: Enhance error handling in _generateEmbeddings.

The error handling in this method logs the entire response object, which might include sensitive information. Consider structuring the error message more carefully.

  if (!response.ok) {
-   console.error("HTTP response: ", response);
-   console.error("HTTP response body: ", await response.json());
-   throw new Error(`HTTP error, status: ${response.status}`);
+   const errorBody = await response.json();
+   const errorMessage = errorBody.error?.message || 'Unknown error';
+   throw new Error(`Gemini embedding generation failed: ${response.status} - ${errorMessage}`);
  }
src/types.d.ts (1)

1-2: Improve documentation clarity.

Replace the uncertain comment with a more descriptive one explaining the purpose of these type declarations.

-// Not 100% sure that these are needed, but it makes my IDE happier at least
+// Type declarations for external modules to support IDE TypeScript integration
src/mocks/syscalls.ts (1)

18-18: Consider documenting the purpose of _spaceConfig.

The underscore prefix suggests this is an internal implementation detail. Consider adding a comment explaining its purpose and relationship to the space configuration mock.

Also applies to: 67-67

src/providers/ollama.ts (2)

55-62: Consider more robust URL manipulation.

The current URL manipulation using regex replacement could be fragile. Consider using URL parsing utilities for more reliable handling.

-    `${this.baseUrl.replace(/\/v1\/?/, "")}/api/tags`,
+    new URL("/api/tags", this.baseUrl.replace(/\/v1\/?$/, "")).toString(),

75-75: Add type safety for model mapping.

Consider adding a type interface for the model response to improve type safety.

interface OllamaModel {
  name: string;
  // add other relevant fields
}

// Then use it in the mapping
return data.models.map((model: OllamaModel) => model.name);
src/connectivity.ts (1)

156-158: Extract test prompts as constants

The test messages are duplicated and hardcoded. Consider extracting them as constants:

const TEST_PROMPTS = {
  CONNECTIVITY: "This is a connectivity test. Respond with exactly 'CONNECTED' (no quotes, no other text).",
  STREAMING: "This is a streaming connectivity test. Respond with exactly 'CONNECTED' (no quotes, no other text)."
};

Also applies to: 183-185

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between be6bc12 and 244778e.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (5)
  • .github/workflows/deno-build.yml is excluded by none and included by none
  • .github/workflows/gh-pages-docs.yml is excluded by none and included by none
  • import_map.json is excluded by none and included by none
  • mkdocs.yml is excluded by none and included by none
  • silverbullet-ai.plug.yaml is excluded by none and included by none
📒 Files selected for processing (13)
  • docs/style.css (1 hunks)
  • src/connectivity.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/embeddings.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/init.test.ts (3 hunks)
  • src/init.ts (4 hunks)
  • src/mocks/mockproviders.ts (3 hunks)
  • src/mocks/syscalls.ts (2 hunks)
  • src/prompts.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/providers/gemini.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/providers/ollama.ts (3 hunks)
  • src/providers/openai.ts (3 hunks)
  • src/types.d.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/utils.test.ts (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
  • src/utils.test.ts
  • src/embeddings.ts
  • docs/style.css
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • src/providers/openai.ts
  • src/mocks/mockproviders.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (8)
src/providers/gemini.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.ts: Review these typescript files for best practices, readability, and DRY.

src/prompts.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.ts: Review these typescript files for best practices, readability, and DRY.

src/init.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.ts: Review these typescript files for best practices, readability, and DRY.

src/init.test.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.ts: Review these typescript files for best practices, readability, and DRY.

src/providers/ollama.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.ts: Review these typescript files for best practices, readability, and DRY.

src/mocks/syscalls.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.ts: Review these typescript files for best practices, readability, and DRY.

src/connectivity.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.ts: Review these typescript files for best practices, readability, and DRY.

src/types.d.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.ts: Review these typescript files for best practices, readability, and DRY.

🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
src/connectivity.ts

[error] 73-74: The assignment should not be in an expression.

The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.

(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)


[error] 81-82: The assignment should not be in an expression.

The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.

(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)


[error] 89-90: The assignment should not be in an expression.

The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.

(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)


[error] 145-146: The assignment should not be in an expression.

The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.

(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)

🔇 Additional comments (14)
src/init.ts (3)

54-54: LGTM! Appropriate error handling for CLI mode.

The use of _error prefix correctly indicates an intentionally unused variable, and the commented error logging aligns with the CLI mode behavior.

Also applies to: 56-56


68-68: LGTM! Consistent error handling pattern.

The error handling follows the same pattern as getSelectedTextModel().

Also applies to: 70-70


82-82: LGTM! Maintains consistent error handling.

The error handling remains consistent with the previous methods.

Also applies to: 84-84

src/providers/gemini.ts (1)

24-24: LGTM! Good use of the override keyword.

The addition of the override keyword improves code clarity by explicitly indicating that this property overrides a property from the parent class AbstractProvider. This change follows TypeScript best practices and helps catch potential errors during compilation.

src/types.d.ts (1)

3-7: Consider version flexibility in module path.

The hard-coded version in the module path might require updates when the dependency is upgraded.

Let's check if this version matches the project's dependency:

Also, consider making the fetch type more specific:

-    let nativeFetch: typeof fetch;
+    let nativeFetch: typeof fetch & {
+      // Add any Deno-specific extensions to the fetch API if they exist
+    };
src/mocks/syscalls.ts (1)

9-9: LGTM! Good use of const declarations.

The change from let to const for object declarations is a good practice as it prevents accidental reassignment while still allowing object mutation when needed.

Also applies to: 15-15

src/init.test.ts (1)

170-178: LGTM! Improved error handling robustness.

The addition of type checking for Error instances enhances error handling reliability. The pattern is consistently applied across test cases, ensuring:

  1. Only Error instances are processed for message assertions
  2. Non-Error instances are properly rethrown
  3. Error handling is more type-safe

Also applies to: 189-197, 209-217

src/prompts.ts (1)

22-22: Verify PostProcessorData usage in the codebase.

The PostProcessorData import was removed. Let's verify it's not used elsewhere in the code.

✅ Verification successful

Removal of PostProcessorData import is correct

The PostProcessorData type is not used in prompts.ts. The type is properly maintained in types.ts and imported where needed (Provider.ts).

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining usage of PostProcessorData
rg "PostProcessorData" 

Length of output: 391


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check content of prompts.ts for any potential PostProcessorData usage
cat src/prompts.ts

Length of output: 13054

src/providers/ollama.ts (2)

47-53: LGTM! Good authentication handling.

The headers setup with conditional authentication is well implemented.


64-73: LGTM! Thorough error handling.

Good error handling with proper logging and validation of the response structure.

src/connectivity.ts (4)

1-14: Clean imports and well-structured constant definition

The imports are well-organized and the page name constant is appropriately defined.


73-74: Refactor assignments in forEach loops

Previous comments have already identified these issues. The assignments within expressions should be refactored to use regular loops for better clarity.

Also applies to: 81-82, 89-90, 145-146

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)

[error] 73-74: The assignment should not be in an expression.

The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.

(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)


280-286: Well-structured command implementation

The command function is concise, well-documented, and follows the single responsibility principle.


16-47: Verify the file metadata implementation

A few concerns about the file metadata functions:

  1. readFileConnectivityTest returns empty data - is this intentional?
  2. Inconsistent size values: 0 in readFileConnectivityTest vs -1 in getFileMetaConnectivityTest

Let's verify if these functions are used correctly:

✅ Verification successful

Implementation verified as correct

The empty data and size discrepancy are intentional parts of the connectivity test implementation. These functions are used to create a diagnostic page that's dynamically populated with AI model configurations and test results. The read-only permission is appropriate as this is a system-managed page.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for usages of these functions to understand the context
rg -A 5 "readFileConnectivityTest|getFileMetaConnectivityTest|writeFileConnectivityTest"

Length of output: 2086


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of updateConnectivityTestPage and related code
ast-grep --pattern 'const connectivityTestPage = $_'

# Get the full implementation of updateConnectivityTestPage
ast-grep --pattern 'export async function updateConnectivityTestPage() {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 14417

src/types.d.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines +49 to +278
let fullResponse = "";
provider.chatWithAI({
messages: [{
role: "user",
content:
"This is a streaming connectivity test. Respond with exactly 'CONNECTED' (no quotes, no other text).",
}],
stream: true,
onDataReceived: (chunk) => {
console.log("Streaming chunk received:", chunk);
chunks.push(chunk);
fullResponse += chunk;
},
onResponseComplete: (finalResponse) => {
resolve(finalResponse);
},
}).catch(reject);
},
);

if (streamingResult.trim() === "CONNECTED") {
text +=
"> ✅ Successfully connected to streaming API and received expected response\n\n";
} else {
text +=
"> ⚠️ Connected to streaming API but received unexpected response\n\n";
text += "```diff\n";
text += "- Expected: CONNECTED\n";
text += `+ Received: ${streamingResult}\n`;
text += "```\n\n";
text +=
"_Note: The streaming API is accessible but may not be following instructions precisely._\n\n";
}

text += "Received chunks: \n```\n";
chunks.forEach((chunk, index) => {
text += `Chunk ${index + 1}: "${chunk}"\n`;
});
text += "```\n\n\n";
} catch (streamError) {
text +=
`> ❌ Failed to connect to streaming API: ${streamError}\n\n`;
text += "**Troubleshooting Tips:**\n\n";
text += "* Verify your provider supports streaming\n";
text += "* Ensure there isn't a proxy affecting streaming\n\n";
}
} catch (error) {
text += `> ❌ Failed to connect to API: ${error}\n\n`;
text += "**Troubleshooting Tips:**\n\n";
text += "* Check your API key if needed\n";
text += "* Ensure the API endpoint is accessible\n";
text += "* Check if you have exceeded API rate limits\n";
text +=
"* Verify you are not using https on silverbullet and connecting to regular http for the api endpoint\n\n";
}
} catch (error) {
text += `> **error** ⚠️ Failed to configure provider: ${error}\n\n`;
}
}

if (imageModel) {
showModelDetails(imageModel, "Image Model", "🎨");
text +=
"> ℹ️ Image generation testing is disabled to avoid unnecessary API usage\n\n";
}

if (embeddingModel) {
showModelDetails(embeddingModel, "Embedding Model", "🔤");

// Test embedding model connectivity
text += "### 🔌 Embedding Provider Setup\n\n";
try {
await configureSelectedEmbeddingModel(embeddingModel);
text += "> ✅ Embedding provider successfully configured\n\n";

// Test embedding generation
text += "### 🧮 Embedding Generation\n\n";
try {
const testText = "This is a connectivity test.";
const embeddings = await currentEmbeddingProvider
.generateEmbeddings({ text: testText });
if (embeddings && embeddings.length > 0) {
text += "> ✅ Successfully generated embeddings\n\n";
text +=
`\`\`\`\nGenerated ${embeddings.length}-dimensional embedding vector\n\`\`\`\n\n`;
} else {
text += "> ⚠️ Connected to API but received empty embeddings\n\n";
}
} catch (error) {
text += `> ❌ Failed to generate embeddings: ${error}\n\n`;
}
} catch (error) {
text += `> ❌ Failed to configure embedding provider: ${error}\n\n`;
}
}
}

await editor.setText(text);
}
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider breaking down this large function

The updateConnectivityTestPage function is quite long and handles multiple responsibilities. Consider splitting it into smaller, focused functions:

  • Model details rendering
  • Connectivity testing for each model type
  • Status reporting

Example refactor for the text model testing:

async function testTextModelConnectivity(model: TextModel): Promise<string> {
  let text = '';
  try {
    const provider = await configureSelectedModel(model);
    text += await testProviderSetup(provider);
    text += await testModelAvailability(provider, model);
    text += await testApiConnectivity(provider);
  } catch (error) {
    text += formatError('Failed to configure provider', error);
  }
  return text;
}
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)

[error] 73-74: The assignment should not be in an expression.

The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.

(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)


[error] 81-82: The assignment should not be in an expression.

The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.

(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)


[error] 89-90: The assignment should not be in an expression.

The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.

(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)


[error] 145-146: The assignment should not be in an expression.

The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.

(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)

Comment on lines +130 to +233

// Test model availability
text += "### 📋 Model Availability\n\n";
try {
const availableModels = await provider.listModels();
if (availableModels.includes(textModel.modelName)) {
text += "> ✅ Selected model is available\n\n";
} else {
text += "> ⚠️ Selected model not found in available models\n\n";
text += "#### Available Models\n\n";
availableModels.forEach((model) => text += `* \`${model}\`\n`);
text += "\n";
}
} catch (error) {
text += `> ❌ Failed to fetch available models: ${error}\n\n`;
}

// Test API connectivity
text += "### 🔌 API Connectivity\n\n";
try {
// Test non-streaming API connectivity
text += "#### 📡 Non-Streaming Test\n\n";
const response = await provider.singleMessageChat(
"This is a connectivity test. Respond with exactly 'CONNECTED' (no quotes, no other text).",
);
if (response && response.trim() === "CONNECTED") {
text +=
"> ✅ Successfully connected to API and received expected response\n\n";
} else {
text +=
"> ⚠️ Connected to API but received unexpected response\n\n";
text += "```diff\n";
text += "- Expected: CONNECTED\n";
text += `+ Received: ${response}\n`;
text += "```\n\n";
text +=
"_Note: The API is accessible but may not be following instructions precisely._\n\n";
}

// Test streaming API connectivity
text += "#### 📡 Streaming Test\n\n";
try {
const chunks: string[] = [];
const streamingResult = await new Promise<string>(
(resolve, reject) => {
let fullResponse = "";
provider.chatWithAI({
messages: [{
role: "user",
content:
"This is a streaming connectivity test. Respond with exactly 'CONNECTED' (no quotes, no other text).",
}],
stream: true,
onDataReceived: (chunk) => {
console.log("Streaming chunk received:", chunk);
chunks.push(chunk);
fullResponse += chunk;
},
onResponseComplete: (finalResponse) => {
resolve(finalResponse);
},
}).catch(reject);
},
);

if (streamingResult.trim() === "CONNECTED") {
text +=
"> ✅ Successfully connected to streaming API and received expected response\n\n";
} else {
text +=
"> ⚠️ Connected to streaming API but received unexpected response\n\n";
text += "```diff\n";
text += "- Expected: CONNECTED\n";
text += `+ Received: ${streamingResult}\n`;
text += "```\n\n";
text +=
"_Note: The streaming API is accessible but may not be following instructions precisely._\n\n";
}

text += "Received chunks: \n```\n";
chunks.forEach((chunk, index) => {
text += `Chunk ${index + 1}: "${chunk}"\n`;
});
text += "```\n\n\n";
} catch (streamError) {
text +=
`> ❌ Failed to connect to streaming API: ${streamError}\n\n`;
text += "**Troubleshooting Tips:**\n\n";
text += "* Verify your provider supports streaming\n";
text += "* Ensure there isn't a proxy affecting streaming\n\n";
}
} catch (error) {
text += `> ❌ Failed to connect to API: ${error}\n\n`;
text += "**Troubleshooting Tips:**\n\n";
text += "* Check your API key if needed\n";
text += "* Ensure the API endpoint is accessible\n";
text += "* Check if you have exceeded API rate limits\n";
text +=
"* Verify you are not using https on silverbullet and connecting to regular http for the api endpoint\n\n";
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add API endpoint validation

When configuring providers and making API calls, consider adding validation for the API endpoints to prevent potential security issues:

  • Validate URL format
  • Ensure HTTPS is used in production
  • Consider adding rate limiting
function validateApiEndpoint(url: string): void {
  const parsed = new URL(url);
  if (process.env.NODE_ENV === 'production' && parsed.protocol !== 'https:') {
    throw new Error('HTTPS is required for API endpoints in production');
  }
  // Add more validation as needed
}
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)

[error] 145-146: The assignment should not be in an expression.

The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.

(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)

@justyns justyns merged commit 01e4781 into main Jan 14, 2025
3 checks passed
@justyns justyns deleted the ai-tester branch January 14, 2025 07:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant