Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Define permissions following the principle of least privilege #2676

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
Jul 1, 2024

Conversation

mauromorales
Copy link
Member

@mauromorales mauromorales commented Jun 27, 2024

relates to #2647

@mauromorales mauromorales force-pushed the openssf-permissions branch from f3f9170 to cbedb85 Compare June 27, 2024 19:17
Signed-off-by: Mauro Morales <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Morales <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Morales <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Morales <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Morales <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Morales <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Morales <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Morales <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Morales <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Morales <[email protected]>
@mauromorales mauromorales changed the title [WIP] Define top permission as read-all Define top permission as read-all Jun 28, 2024
@mauromorales mauromorales marked this pull request as ready for review June 28, 2024 05:51
@mauromorales mauromorales requested a review from a team June 28, 2024 05:51
@mauromorales mauromorales self-assigned this Jun 28, 2024
@mauromorales mauromorales changed the title Define top permission as read-all Define permissions following the principle of least privilege Jun 28, 2024
@mauromorales mauromorales merged commit 5f4e90b into master Jul 1, 2024
40 of 41 checks passed
@mauromorales mauromorales deleted the openssf-permissions branch July 1, 2024 09:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants