Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP: 🐛 cache/replication: fix comparison whether update is needed by removing meta fields #3171

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sttts
Copy link
Member

@sttts sttts commented Sep 19, 2024

Summary

NOT SURE THIS PR IS CORRECT: found #2935 and kcp-dev/kubernetes#132.

The comparison in the replication controller between cached and local object didn't filter generation and managedFields. This was leading to repeated replication.

Related issue(s)

Fixes #

Release Notes

NONE

@kcp-ci-bot kcp-ci-bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the DCO. labels Sep 19, 2024
@kcp-ci-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from sttts. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@kcp-ci-bot kcp-ci-bot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 19, 2024
@sttts sttts force-pushed the sttts-cache-replicate-comparison branch 2 times, most recently from 504069b to 0c63bf6 Compare September 19, 2024 18:39
@sttts sttts force-pushed the sttts-cache-replicate-comparison branch from 0c63bf6 to 3fc6fdc Compare September 19, 2024 19:15
@sttts sttts changed the title 🐛 cache/replication: fix comparison whether update is needed by removing meta fields WIP: 🐛 cache/replication: fix comparison whether update is needed by removing meta fields Sep 19, 2024
@kcp-ci-bot kcp-ci-bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 19, 2024
@kcp-ci-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@sttts: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-kcp-test-e2e-shared 3fc6fdc link true /test pull-kcp-test-e2e-shared
pull-kcp-test-e2e-sharded 3fc6fdc link true /test pull-kcp-test-e2e-sharded
pull-kcp-test-e2e 3fc6fdc link true /test pull-kcp-test-e2e
pull-kcp-test-e2e-multiple-runs 3fc6fdc link true /test pull-kcp-test-e2e-multiple-runs

Full PR test history

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@kcp-ci-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
After a furter 30 days, they will turn rotten.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@kcp-ci-bot kcp-ci-bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Dec 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the DCO. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants