Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "♻️ Refector Update main.py" #13

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 7, 2024
Merged

Conversation

NxPKG
Copy link
Contributor

@NxPKG NxPKG commented Nov 7, 2024

User description

Reverts #12


PR Type

enhancement, bug fix


Description

  • Reverted the loop range in main.py from a variable number_of_trials back to a hardcoded value of 10, affecting the handling of race condition trials.
  • Fixed a typo in model.py by correcting "worflow" to "workflow" in the head_sha field description.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
main.py
Revert loop range to hardcoded value in main.py                   

latest_changes/main.py

  • Reverted the loop range from a variable number_of_trials back to a
    hardcoded value of 10.
  • This change affects the loop that handles race condition trials.
  • +1/-1     
    Bug fix
    model.py
    Fix typo in model.py field description                                     

    latest_changes/model.py

  • Fixed a typo in the description of the head_sha field.
  • Corrected "worflow" to "workflow".
  • +1/-1     

    💡 PR-Agent usage: Comment /help "your question" on any pull request to receive relevant information

    Copy link

    sourcery-ai bot commented Nov 7, 2024

    Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

    This PR reverts a previous refactoring change, restoring two specific code elements to their original state: a hardcoded value in a loop and fixing a typo in a field description.

    Class diagram for WorkflowRun model changes

    classDiagram
        class WorkflowRun {
            - head_branch: str
            - head_sha: str
            - run_number: int
            note for head_sha "Reverted description typo fix"
        }
    
    Loading

    File-Level Changes

    Change Details Files
    Reverted loop iteration count from variable to hardcoded value
    • Changed loop range from variable 'number_of_trials' back to hardcoded value '10'
    latest_changes/main.py
    Reverted field description text
    • Changed 'workflow' back to 'worflow' (with typo) in head_sha field description
    latest_changes/model.py

    Tips and commands

    Interacting with Sourcery

    • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
    • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
    • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
      issue from a review comment by replying to it.
    • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
      request title to generate a title at any time.
    • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
      the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
      this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

    Customizing Your Experience

    Access your dashboard to:

    • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
      summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
    • Change the review language.
    • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
    • Adjust other review settings.

    Getting Help

    Copy link

    coderabbitai bot commented Nov 7, 2024

    Warning

    Rate limit exceeded

    @codiumai-pr-agent-free[bot] has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 11 minutes and 20 seconds before requesting another review.

    ⌛ How to resolve this issue?

    After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

    We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

    🚦 How do rate limits work?

    CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

    Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

    Please see our FAQ for further information.

    📥 Commits

    Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3d52e2c and 3a87268.


    Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

    ❤️ Share
    🪧 Tips

    Chat

    There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

    • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
      • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
      • Generate unit testing code for this file.
      • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
    • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
      • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
      • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
    • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
      • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
      • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
      • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
      • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

    Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

    CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

    • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
    • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
    • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
    • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
    • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
    • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
    • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
    • @coderabbitai help to get help.

    Other keywords and placeholders

    • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
    • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
    • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

    CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

    • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
    • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
    • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

    Documentation and Community

    • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
    • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
    • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

    Copy link

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

    🎫 Ticket compliance analysis ❌

    12 - Not compliant

    Not compliant requirements:

    • Replace hardcoded loop range with variable number_of_trials in main.py
    • Improve code readability and maintainability
    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪
    🧪 No relevant tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    ⚡ Recommended focus areas for review

    Reversion of Previous Change
    The PR reverts the previous change, replacing the variable number_of_trials with a hardcoded value of 10. This goes against the original ticket requirements and may impact code maintainability.

    Typo Fix
    A typo in the description of the head_sha field has been fixed, changing "worflow" to "workflow". This change was not mentioned in the original ticket and seems unrelated to the main purpose of the PR.

    Copy link

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    Explore these optional code suggestions:

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Typo
    Correct a typo in the field description to improve documentation accuracy

    Correct the typo in the description of the head_sha field by changing "worflow" to
    "workflow".

    latest_changes/model.py [3215-3219]

     head_sha: str = Field(
         ...,
    -    description='The SHA of the head commit that points to the version of the worflow being run.',
    +    description='The SHA of the head commit that points to the version of the workflow being run.',
         example='009b8a3a9ccbb128af87f9b1c0f4c62e8a304f6d',
     )
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 10

    Why: The suggestion correctly identifies and fixes a critical typo in the documentation. Accurate documentation is crucial for code understanding and maintenance.

    10

    💡 Need additional feedback ? start a PR chat

    Copy link

    @sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Hey @NxPKG - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

    Overall Comments:

    • Please use the number_of_trials variable instead of hardcoding '10' to maintain code maintainability
    • There's a typo in the head_sha field description: 'worflow' should be 'workflow'
    Here's what I looked at during the review
    • 🟡 General issues: 1 issue found
    • 🟢 Security: all looks good
    • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
    • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
    • 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

    Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
    Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

    @@ -3214,7 +3214,7 @@ class WorkflowRun(BaseModel):
    head_branch: str = Field(..., example='master')
    head_sha: str = Field(
    ...,
    description='The SHA of the head commit that points to the version of the workflow being run.',
    description='The SHA of the head commit that points to the version of the worflow being run.',
    Copy link

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    nitpick (typo): Typo in field description: 'worflow' should be 'workflow'

    @NxPKG NxPKG merged commit 27e8e57 into main Nov 7, 2024
    8 checks passed
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    1 participant