Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove validateURL checks #13

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Remove validateURL checks #13

wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

viv-kinde
Copy link
Member

@viv-kinde viv-kinde commented Apr 3, 2024

remove regex check for url

Explain your changes

Suppose there is a related issue with enough detail for a reviewer to understand your changes fully. In that case, you can omit an explanation and instead include either “Fixes #XX” or “Updates #XX” where “XX” is the issue number.

Checklist

🛟 If you need help, consider asking for advice over in the Kinde community.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Simplified URL validation logic in the SDK constructor.
    • Removed URL validation method and reformatting changes in Utils.java.

remove regex check for url
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 3, 2024

Warning

Rate Limit Exceeded

@viv-kinde has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 24 minutes and 52 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.
Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.
Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 13930e9 and d6dfc41.

Walkthrough

The recent update to the KindeClientSDK simplifies the process of initializing the SDK by removing the URL validation checks for key parameters such as domain, redirectUri, and logoutRedirectUri, streamlining the setup process.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.../sdk/KindeClientSDK.java Removed URL validation for domain, redirectUri, and logoutRedirectUri parameters.
.../sdk/utils/Utils.java Removed validateURL method for URL validation and made reformatting changes. Eliminated URL validation logic.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review Status

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 49e92c0 and 763571c.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/main/java/org/openapitools/sdk/KindeClientSDK.java (3 hunks)

Comment on lines 118 to 128
if (domain == null || domain.isEmpty()) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Please provide domain");
}
if (!Utils.validateURL(domain)) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Please provide valid domain");
}
this.domain = domain;

if (redirectUri == null || redirectUri.isEmpty()) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Please provide redirect_uri");
}
if (!Utils.validateURL(redirectUri)) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Please provide valid redirect_uri");
}
this.redirectUri = redirectUri;

if (clientSecret == null || clientSecret.isEmpty()) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [103-105]

Consider adding basic URL format validation for domain, redirectUri, and logoutRedirectUri parameters to ensure they are well-formed URLs.

+ import java.net.URL;
+ 
  if (domain == null || domain.isEmpty()) {
      throw new IllegalArgumentException("Please provide domain");
  }
+ try {
+     new URL(domain);
+ } catch (MalformedURLException e) {
+     throw new IllegalArgumentException("Domain must be a valid URL");
+ }

Repeat similar validation for redirectUri and logoutRedirectUri. This ensures that the URLs are syntactically valid, reducing the risk of errors or security vulnerabilities associated with malformed URLs.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Status

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 763571c and 13930e9.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/main/java/org/openapitools/sdk/utils/Utils.java (2 hunks)

@onderay onderay requested review from VeryKinde and removed request for DaveOrDead April 9, 2024 05:54
Copy link
Contributor

@VeryKinde VeryKinde left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks fine, removal of URL Check.
That was one crazy regex, going to assume this was a nice to have. There's a library that's in the JDK that does this we could use: https://developer.classpath.org/doc/java/net/URL.html

@brettchaldecott
Copy link
Contributor

With the updated version of the SDK this change has now been made redundant please close.

@brettchaldecott
Copy link
Contributor

This is no longer a requirement with the new SDK. Please close this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants