Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mark Groupchats in Chatlist #818

Closed
webratte opened this issue Sep 16, 2016 · 11 comments
Closed

Mark Groupchats in Chatlist #818

webratte opened this issue Sep 16, 2016 · 11 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@webratte
Copy link
Contributor

webratte commented Sep 16, 2016

Is it a good idea to mark Groupchats (e.g. by text colour or other things) to make they different to 1to1 chats?

@daniele-athome
Copy link
Member

Good idea. First of all it should have a different default avatar than a contact. What else do you suggest?

@TheLastProject
Copy link
Contributor

Telegram does this by prefixing all groups with a group icon:
Google Play screenshot

@daniele-athome daniele-athome added this to the 4.0.0 milestone Sep 16, 2016
@daniele-athome daniele-athome added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 16, 2016
@webratte
Copy link
Contributor Author

webratte commented Sep 16, 2016

@TheLastProject This seams not different enough for me.
On your screenshot I searched a few seconds to find the prefix.

But at the moment I have no better idea.
I will think about it.

@webratte
Copy link
Contributor Author

webratte commented Sep 17, 2016 via email

@daniele-athome
Copy link
Member

No, sorry, that's against Android UI rules: background should reflect state, not type (except in some rare situations, which Kontalk is not).

@webratte
Copy link
Contributor Author

webratte commented Sep 17, 2016 via email

@daniele-athome daniele-athome self-assigned this Sep 17, 2016
daniele-athome added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 17, 2016
@webratte
Copy link
Contributor Author

webratte commented Sep 17, 2016 via email

@abika
Copy link
Member

abika commented Sep 17, 2016

The icon in Telegram is really hard to see imo.

In the desktop client the title font for group chats is in dark green. Maybe this is an option. [And i just noticed this is not very considerate of colorblind people... ]

Maybe an indication in the chat icon? A border or different background (only for the icon)?

@daniele-athome
Copy link
Member

The group avatar will have a different default icon for now (I will do it soon). After custom group pictures will be implemented, I think the problem should relatively go away for two reasons:

  • the custom picture will be easily recognizable by the user
  • I've just implemented name prefix for groups (e396a16)

@daniele-athome
Copy link
Member

Ad-hoc default icon for groups in 3030487.

@daniele-athome daniele-athome modified the milestones: 4.0.1, 4.0.0 Oct 1, 2016
@daniele-athome daniele-athome removed their assignment Nov 27, 2016
@daniele-athome daniele-athome modified the milestones: 4.0.1, 4.0.2 Feb 14, 2017
@daniele-athome daniele-athome modified the milestones: 4.0.2, 4.0.3, 4.0.4 Apr 22, 2017
@daniele-athome daniele-athome removed this from the 4.0.4 milestone May 30, 2017
@daniele-athome daniele-athome modified the milestones: 4.0.5, 4.0.4 May 30, 2017
@daniele-athome daniele-athome modified the milestones: 4.0.5, 4.1.0 Jul 10, 2017
@daniele-athome daniele-athome modified the milestones: 4.1.0, 4.1.1 Sep 2, 2017
@daniele-athome daniele-athome removed this from the 4.1.1 milestone Nov 1, 2017
daniele-athome added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 15, 2018
@daniele-athome
Copy link
Member

I've added a group indicator like Telegram does in d9bdb7e. If you have any other ideas I'm listening :-)

@daniele-athome daniele-athome self-assigned this Sep 15, 2018
@daniele-athome daniele-athome added this to the Next milestone Sep 15, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants