drop Local only env var

[nawazkh]

What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:

• This PR drops the env variable LOCAL_ONLY from the test scripts. We dont seem to be using it anymore, so cleaning it up.
• By dropping LOCAL_ONLY I have defaulted USE_LOCAL_KIND_REGISTRY to true as it would be behaved with LOCAL_ONLY being present.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):

Special notes for your reviewer:

• cherry-pick candidate

TODOs:

• squashed commits
• includes documentation
• adds unit tests

Release note:

Drop LOCAL_ONLY env var from the test scripts.

[k8s-ci-robot]

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

[jsturtevant]

/lgtm

[k8s-ci-robot]

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 60f6b749593a366ab73365176555e6fb0c3318bf

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 51.18%. Comparing base (0dee597) to head (851b93d).
Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #4998   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   51.18%   51.18%           
=======================================
  Files         274      274           
  Lines       24625    24625           
=======================================
  Hits        12605    12605           
  Misses      11234    11234           
  Partials      786      786           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[jackfrancis]

/lgtm
/approve

should we remove all of the references and comments in test-infra jobs?

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jackfrancis

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [jackfrancis]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[nojnhuh]

/retest

[nojnhuh]

/retest

[nojnhuh]

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-e2e

[nojnhuh]

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-e2e

[nawazkh]

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-e2e

[nojnhuh]

/lgtm

[k8s-ci-robot]

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 234e22b458b72bb7bc23c78fe2f7732e8eb2b551

[nojnhuh]

/retest

[k8s-ci-robot]

@nawazkh: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-conformance	851b93d	link	false	/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-conformance
pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-conformance-dual-stack-with-ci-artifacts	851b93d	link	false	/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-conformance-dual-stack-with-ci-artifacts
pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-conformance-custom-builds	851b93d	link	false	/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-conformance-custom-builds
pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-capi-e2e	851b93d	link	false	/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-capi-e2e
pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-windows-custom-builds	851b93d	link	false	/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-windows-custom-builds
pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-windows-with-ci-artifacts	851b93d	link	false	/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-windows-with-ci-artifacts

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.