Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Cleaning up GEP Template
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
robscott committed Aug 5, 2021
1 parent 3a6ee42 commit dad9f3c
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 12 additions and 43 deletions.
18 changes: 11 additions & 7 deletions site-src/geps/gep-696.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
# GEP-696: GEP template

* Issue URL: https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/gateway-api/issues/696
* Status: (provisional, implementable, implemented, deferred, rejected, withdrawn, or replaced)
* Issue: [#696](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/gateway-api/issues/696)
* Status: Provisional|Implementable|Implemented|Deferred|Rejected|Withdrawn|Replaced

(See definitions in [Kubernetes KEP][kep-status].

Expand All @@ -11,7 +11,15 @@

(1-2 sentence summary of the proposal)

## Motivation/User Journeys/Background
## Goals

(Primary goals of this proposal.)

## Non-Goals

(What is out of scope for this proposal.)

## Introduction

(Can link to external doc -- but we should bias towards copying
the content into the GEP as online documents are easier to lose
Expand All @@ -27,10 +35,6 @@ the content into the GEP as online documents are easier to lose
(List other design alternatives and why we did not go in that
direction)

## Out of scope

(What is out of scope for this proposal.)

## References

(Add any additional document links. Again, we should try to avoid
Expand Down
37 changes: 1 addition & 36 deletions site-src/v1alpha2/contributing/gep.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -46,42 +46,7 @@ can easily find previous discussions and alternatives considered.

## Format

``` markdown
# GEP-1234: Add Chaosnet protocol support

Status: (provisional, implementable, implemented, deferred, rejected, withdrawn, or replaced)

(See definitions in: https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/blob/master/keps/NNNN-kep-template/kep.yaml#L9)

## TLDR

(1-2 sentence summary of the proposal)

## Motivation/User Journeys/Background

(Can link to external doc -- but we should bias towards copying
the content into the GEP as online documents are easier to lose
-- e.g. owner messes up the permissions, accidental deletion)

## API

(... details, can point to PR with changes)


## Alternatives

(List other design alternatives and why we did not go in that
direction)

## Out of scope

(What is out of scope for this proposal.)

## References

(Add any additional document links. Again, we should try to avoid
too much content not in version control to avoid broken links)
```
GEPs should match the format of the template found in [GEP-696](/geps/gep-696).

## Out of scope

Expand Down

0 comments on commit dad9f3c

Please sign in to comment.