-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 300
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make ClusterQueue's AdmissionCheckStrategy a pointer, avoid type casting #1993
Make ClusterQueue's AdmissionCheckStrategy a pointer, avoid type casting #1993
Conversation
/assign @tenzen-y |
✅ Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-kueue canceled.
|
d3e6e97
to
3112eec
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall lgtm.
/remove-kind bug |
3dfa922
to
50f4793
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you!
/lgtm
/approve
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: PBundyra, tenzen-y The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/lgtm cancel |
ee29e21
to
6dc4cde
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thx!
/lgtm
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: aa8707df4a44c47b4159b0208b560776887b1eb1
|
…ing (kubernetes-sigs#1993) * Make AdmissionCheckStrategy a pointer, avoid type casting * Fix flaky integration test
…ing (kubernetes-sigs#1993) * Make AdmissionCheckStrategy a pointer, avoid type casting * Fix flaky integration test
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
What this PR does / why we need it:
Addresses comments of an already merged PR #1960
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Part of #1432
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?