update OWNERS file

[cpanato]

Fix: #67

let me know if that is correct or if need to add/remove
cc @BenTheElder @jberkus

[MadhavJivrajani]

/lgtm

[BenTheElder]

this is sort of needlessly opaque (and prevents emeritus-ing) if we're just going to use it in OWNERS/ anyhow?

[cpanato]

i can drop and we use just Owners

[BenTheElder]

IMHO: I pinged the current set of leads to invite them to help because we need people from somewhere (and same for contribex), but I don't know that this is strictly related to those roles long term if we gain healthy subproject owners.

[jberkus]

Did you want to hold this PR then, or approve it?

[BenTheElder]

My personal suggestion is that we inline the approvers in OWNERS as just the owners of this repo, but I don't consider it a hard blocker. Nobody currently on the PR can actually approve it.

[cpanato]

did an update, PTAL

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cpanato
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign katharine for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[cpanato]

gently ping to we close this and we can move forward @jberkus @BenTheElder
we can adjust a fine grain maybe in a follow up

[BenTheElder]

/lgtm

[BenTheElder]

We will need an existing approver to get this in:
/assign @jeefy @nikhita