-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New unique logging meta-data into key Kubernetes logs #1668
Comments
/sig instrumentation |
@hase1128: You must be a member of the kubernetes/milestone-maintainers GitHub team to set the milestone. If you believe you should be able to issue the /milestone command, please contact your and have them propose you as an additional delegate for this responsibility. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/cc |
1 similar comment
/cc |
/milestone v1.20 |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
Hi @hase1128 ! Enhancements Lead here, do you still intend to target this for alpha in 1.20? Thanks! |
I would like to aim for 1.20 if possible, but 1.21 may be appropriate in terms of time. |
Hi @hase1128 We will track for now and you can just keep us updated. |
As a note I left some comments on your KEP PR that will need to be resolved as well: #1961 (review) |
Assuming the KEP is completed and approved, we will target 1.20; otherwise this will slip to 1.21 for alpha. |
Great. We are tracking it for now, let us know if anything changes. As a note Enhancements Freeze is October 6th and the KEP will need to be merged, implementable (it's currently provisional) as well as have test plans and graduation criteria added. Would also be good to fill out the PRR. |
Hi @hase1128, Enhancement shadow for 1.20 release here 👋. As we're moving close to the Enhancement Freeze deadline ( We're looking for the KEP PR to have the following before this deadline:
Please let me know if you have any questions, thank you! |
Has this slipped to 1.21? the kep update seems to say so: https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/pull/1961/files#diff-168484bdbc7e288639cb3b3a8cfc7552 |
I think it will be 1.21. |
Thanks for the update! /milestone clear |
Ack from SIG Instrumentation leads/regular meeting on pushing to 1.21. |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
Hi @zhijianli88 👋 1.22 Enhancement Shadow here This enhancement is in good shape, just some minor change requests light of Enhancement Freeze on Thursday May 13th:
Thanks! 😊 |
Hi @zhijianli88 👋 1.22 Enhancements shadow here. |
Seems we cannot catch up 1.22 since some misgivings in our KEP have not got resolved and consensus. I would greatly appreciate it if you kindly give me some feedback. |
Hi @zhijianli88, not sure if I understand your question, but it looks like you only need to make some minor changes I mentioned above and get your KEP PR merged to master. If you are unable to merge in time for 1.22 Enhancement Freeze tomorrow, you have the option to file for an exception or update your KEP for the future releases. Let me know if this answers your questions and if I can help in any way |
Thanks for your help. I guess I got your point. of cause i will update the kep.yaml as your mentioned above later becuase they are out of day. but the key point is the design in this KEP have not get approved by community. So I'd like to shift to 1.23 instead. |
/milestone v1.23 Thanks! |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
/milestone clear |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle rotten |
This may be superseded by #3077 which has similar goals. |
Perhaps not superseded because nothing in that proposal will be specifically about trace IDs. But it should indeed provide the necessary logging infrastructure for this enhancement here. |
See #1961 (review). This enhancement was designed to be complementary to contextual logging. |
to achieve our goal, we planned this 2 steps.
contextual logging #3077 helps "adding context information to logs" and propagates trace context in one component. This is my understanding about the positions of our KEP and #3078. Does this fit your (and SIG-instrumentation's) understanding? @dashpole @pohly |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /close |
@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Enhancement Description
Please to keep this description up to date. This will help the Enhancement Team track efficiently the evolution of the enhancement
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: