-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Revisit kops models #744
Comments
This might be a missed candidate for 1.5 - this is a huge win for kops - and with the extra help we are getting... this might be remarkably beneficial |
So this is a HUGE refactor. We have to have e2e harness, and MAJOR unit tests in place. There be BIG dragons.... Really big dragons here. |
We know - but it might be a necessary evil - and we need to start discussions on this |
We have PR inbound thay may help with this ... I am looking through issues to test against #1183 - no promises but we need to test. @kris-nova comments? |
Closed with #1183 |
Myself and @justinsb have been talking about a future where kops no longer has YAML model files, but rather implements the tasks in code.
Opening a task for feedback and to track a potentially large refactor.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: