Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: implement azure get api ingress status fn #10609

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 23, 2021

Conversation

ngalantowicz
Copy link
Contributor

@ngalantowicz ngalantowicz commented Jan 19, 2021

Fix:

  • Updates azure getting started doc to instruct correct feature flag value

Feature:

  • Creates azureup network interfaces client with List method

Update:

  • Uses vmScaleSet client and new network interfaces client to get masters ip for api ingress status

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your pull request. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please follow instructions at https://git.k8s.io/community/CLA.md#the-contributor-license-agreement to sign the CLA.

It may take a couple minutes for the CLA signature to be fully registered; after that, please reply here with a new comment and we'll verify. Thanks.


  • If you've already signed a CLA, it's possible we don't have your GitHub username or you're using a different email address. Check your existing CLA data and verify that your email is set on your git commits.
  • If you signed the CLA as a corporation, please sign in with your organization's credentials at https://identity.linuxfoundation.org/projects/cncf to be authorized.
  • If you have done the above and are still having issues with the CLA being reported as unsigned, please log a ticket with the Linux Foundation Helpdesk: https://support.linuxfoundation.org/
  • Should you encounter any issues with the Linux Foundation Helpdesk, send a message to the backup e-mail support address at: [email protected]

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label Jan 19, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @ngalantowicz!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes/kops 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes/kops has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @ngalantowicz. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 19, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/documentation area/provider/azure Issues or PRs related to azure provider labels Jan 19, 2021
@ngalantowicz ngalantowicz force-pushed the azureApiIngressStatus branch from 81efa9c to 7c1d55c Compare January 19, 2021 21:01
@ngalantowicz
Copy link
Contributor Author

CLA has been signed 👍

Copy link
Contributor

@kenji-cloudnatix kenji-cloudnatix left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for making the change, @ngalantowicz ! I just have one comment on the use of cluster.AzureResourceGroupName().

upup/pkg/fi/cloudup/azure/azure_cloud.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
upup/pkg/fi/cloudup/azure/azure_cloud.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@rifelpet
Copy link
Member

hm the CLA bot still isn't detecting that you signed it. Are you sure you signed with the email address(es) associated with these git commits?

@ngalantowicz ngalantowicz force-pushed the azureApiIngressStatus branch 2 times, most recently from 1b64a5d to d6c3c40 Compare January 20, 2021 04:42
@ngalantowicz
Copy link
Contributor Author

/check-cla

1 similar comment
@rifelpet
Copy link
Member

/check-cla

@ngalantowicz
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for the quick comments. Based on your suggestions i made the following updates

  • utilize cluster.AzureResourceGroupName()
  • use tags for master scale set discovery
		val, ok := scaleSet.Tags["KubernetesCluster"]
		val2, ok2 := scaleSet.Tags["k8s.io_role_master"]
		if ok && *val == cluster.Name && ok2 && *val2 == "1" {
			vmssName = *scaleSet.Name
			break
		}
  • identify single network interface ip based on "Primary" metadata
               if *ni.Primary == true {
			for _, i := range *ni.IPConfigurations {
				ingresses = append(ingresses, kops.ApiIngressStatus{
					IP: *i.PrivateIPAddress,
				})
			}
		}

Regarding CLA:
Screen Shot 2021-01-20 at 12 12 03 AM
Screen Shot 2021-01-20 at 12 08 53 AM
According to the CNCF CLA Signing FAQ

...the Github user that the commit is attributed to (based on a match between the commit authorship and Github profile) must be linked to a Linux Foundation ID user (on the "social network logins" tab), who is authorized by a signed ICLA and/or a CCLA.

Not sure what i'm missing

@rifelpet
Copy link
Member

rifelpet commented Jan 20, 2021

@ngalantowicz i pulled the branch locally and noticed your git commit is authored by your gmail.com address rather than your t1cg.com address. here is some straight forward instructions for changing the email on an existing commit.

and then you can use git config user.email "[email protected]" in your kops repo to set it for new commits going forward.

@ngalantowicz ngalantowicz force-pushed the azureApiIngressStatus branch from d6c3c40 to 1396ee5 Compare January 20, 2021 16:07
@ngalantowicz
Copy link
Contributor Author

ngalantowicz commented Jan 20, 2021

/check-cla

@rifelpet Edited Author:

➜  kops git:(azureApiIngressStatus) git log -n1
commit 1396ee5777320a86b955441246f889a52dcf3b6a (HEAD -> azureApiIngressStatus, origin/azureApiIngressStatus)
Author: Nicholas Galantowicz <[email protected]>
Date:   Fri Jan 15 15:01:33 2021 -0500

    feat: implement azure getapiingressstatus fn

@ngalantowicz
Copy link
Contributor Author

/check-cla

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Jan 20, 2021
@rifelpet
Copy link
Member

there we go!
/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Jan 20, 2021
@ngalantowicz ngalantowicz force-pushed the azureApiIngressStatus branch from 1396ee5 to 0c0ca8d Compare January 21, 2021 15:09
@rifelpet
Copy link
Member

@kenji-cloudnatix this looks good to me. If it looks good to you then we can get this merged

Copy link
Contributor

@kenji-cloudnatix kenji-cloudnatix left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Have minor comments, but looks good to me!

upup/pkg/fi/cloudup/azure/azure_cloud.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
upup/pkg/fi/cloudup/azure/azure_cloud.go Show resolved Hide resolved
upup/pkg/fi/cloudup/azure/azure_cloud.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@ngalantowicz ngalantowicz force-pushed the azureApiIngressStatus branch from 0c0ca8d to 7759355 Compare January 21, 2021 18:43
@rifelpet
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 23, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: kenji-cloudnatix, ngalantowicz, rifelpet

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 23, 2021
@ngalantowicz ngalantowicz force-pushed the azureApiIngressStatus branch from 7759355 to 0735d15 Compare January 23, 2021 20:01
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 23, 2021
@ngalantowicz
Copy link
Contributor Author

rebased

@rifelpet
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 23, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 57e2c8e into kubernetes:master Jan 23, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.20 milestone Jan 23, 2021
@ngalantowicz ngalantowicz deleted the azureApiIngressStatus branch February 19, 2021 18:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/documentation area/provider/azure Issues or PRs related to azure provider cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants