-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve instance type validation error message #11043
Conversation
pkg/apis/kops/validation/aws.go
Outdated
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ func awsValidateInstanceTypeAndImage(instanceTypeFieldPath *field.Path, imageFie | |||
} | |||
if !found { | |||
allErrs = append(allErrs, field.Invalid(instanceTypeFieldPath, instanceType, | |||
fmt.Sprintf("machine type architecture does not match image architecture: %+v - %q", machineInfo.ProcessorInfo, imageArch))) | |||
fmt.Sprintf("machine type architecture does not match image architecture: %+v - %s", strings.Join(fi.StringSliceValue(machineInfo.ProcessorInfo.SupportedArchitectures), ","), imageArch))) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think now we don't need %+v
anymore.
fmt.Sprintf("machine type architecture does not match image architecture: %+v - %s", strings.Join(fi.StringSliceValue(machineInfo.ProcessorInfo.SupportedArchitectures), ","), imageArch))) | |
fmt.Sprintf("machine type architecture does not match image architecture: %s - %s", strings.Join(fi.StringSliceValue(machineInfo.ProcessorInfo.SupportedArchitectures), ","), imageArch))) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yup.
4fd89ae
to
059c7ef
Compare
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: hakman The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/test pull-kops-e2e-k8s-containerd |
…-upstream-release-1.20 Automated cherry pick of #11043: Improve instance type validation error message
This should be reasonably safe as the machineInfo field should not be nil on a valid instance type. Would like some opinions on this.