Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

exec target command, but still pipe it to tee #4286

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 29, 2018
Merged

exec target command, but still pipe it to tee #4286

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 29, 2018

Conversation

justinsb
Copy link
Member

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 17, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 20, 2018
@justinsb justinsb force-pushed the exec_with_bin_sh branch 2 times, most recently from a559cfe to 176b94e Compare January 20, 2018 16:40
@justinsb
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@justinsb justinsb force-pushed the exec_with_bin_sh branch 2 times, most recently from 98cbf17 to f25ca91 Compare January 20, 2018 21:45
@chrislovecnm
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@justinsb justinsb force-pushed the exec_with_bin_sh branch 3 times, most recently from 79de868 to 4ffeba8 Compare January 24, 2018 15:49
@justinsb
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@justinsb
Copy link
Member Author

capacity issues (?)

/retest

@justinsb justinsb changed the title WIP: exec target command, but still pipe it to tee exec target command, but still pipe it to tee Jan 27, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 27, 2018
@justinsb
Copy link
Member Author

Lots of iterations were needed, but the artifacts are now being produced :-)

@chrislovecnm
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 29, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: chrislovecnm, justinsb

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these OWNERS Files:
  • OWNERS [chrislovecnm,justinsb]

You can indicate your approval by writing /approve in a comment
You can cancel your approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 6cce242 into kubernetes:master Jan 29, 2018
@KashifSaadat KashifSaadat mentioned this pull request Feb 8, 2018
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@chrislovecnm chrislovecnm chrislovecnm approved these changes

Assignees

@chrislovecnm chrislovecnm

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@justinsb @chrislovecnm @k8s-ci-robot