Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enable scraping of weave metrics #7326

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 1, 2019

Conversation

zacblazic
Copy link
Contributor

Weave has some useful metrics that it exposes on two ports:

  • 6782 - Weave router
  • 6781 - Weave network policy controller

This change annotates the weave pod, making it a target for scraping by prometheus.

It also adds two container ports, one for each container, which prometheus will probe for /metrics endpoints. This gets around the limitation that you can only have one prometheus.io/port annotation per pod. I've also given the ports the name "metrics" so that if necessary, users can adjust their prometheus configuration to target them more directly.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Jul 26, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @zacblazic. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 26, 2019
@rifelpet
Copy link
Member

Thank you! Can you bump the -kops.X suffixes on these versions as well?

versions := map[string]string{
"pre-k8s-1.6": "2.3.0-kops.2",
"k8s-1.6": "2.3.0-kops.2",
"k8s-1.7": "2.5.1-kops.1",
"k8s-1.8": "2.5.1-kops.1",
"k8s-1.12": "2.5.1-kops.1",
}

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Jul 26, 2019
@zacblazic
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you! Can you bump the -kops.X suffixes on these versions as well?

versions := map[string]string{
"pre-k8s-1.6": "2.3.0-kops.2",
"k8s-1.6": "2.3.0-kops.2",
"k8s-1.7": "2.5.1-kops.1",
"k8s-1.8": "2.5.1-kops.1",
"k8s-1.12": "2.5.1-kops.1",
}

Hi @rifelpet, to confirm should the change be as follows?

versions := map[string]string{ 
-  	"pre-k8s-1.6": "2.3.0-kops.2", 
-  	"k8s-1.6":     "2.3.0-kops.2", 
-  	"k8s-1.7":     "2.5.1-kops.1", 
-  	"k8s-1.8":     "2.5.1-kops.1", 
-  	"k8s-1.12":    "2.5.1-kops.1", 
-  } 
+  	"pre-k8s-1.6": "2.3.0-kops.3", 
+  	"k8s-1.6":     "2.3.0-kops.3", 
+  	"k8s-1.7":     "2.5.1-kops.2", 
+  	"k8s-1.8":     "2.5.1-kops.2", 
+  	"k8s-1.12":    "2.5.1-kops.2", 
+  }

Also, should I bump the versions in channel builder weave manifest as well?

@rifelpet
Copy link
Member

Yes, your proposed change is good. And, yes the versions in manifest.yaml will need updating along with the manifestHashes, see the travis job output:

https://api.travis-ci.org/v3/job/564013596/log.txt

search for FAIL: in the job output to see what the tests expect for manifestHash

@justinsb
Copy link
Member

justinsb commented Aug 1, 2019

This looks great - thank you!

FYI, we also have the hack/update-expected.sh script which should update those hashes.

(As a side note, the intent of this testing to materialize changes so that they can be inspected in code-review. I'm not sure there's a ton of review we can do on the hashes, so maybe we should mask them out in our e2e testing.)

Anyway, thanks @zacblazic :-)

/approve
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 1, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: justinsb, zacblazic

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 1, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit f5e272f into kubernetes:master Aug 1, 2019
k8s-ci-robot added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants